mirror of
https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe.git
synced 2026-09-19 08:45:47 +08:00
1e3fbb5ea8
* SwarmMemoryManager Refactoring Plan * fix: add missing directories to npm package (v1.9.3) Added templates/, .claude/helpers/, and docs/reference/ to package.json files array. These were missing from the npm distribution, causing `aqe init` to fail with "Template file not found" errors. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * checkpoint improvements * fix: critical memory/learning system fixes for v1.9.4 ## Critical Fixes - Vector embeddings now stored correctly (was storing NULL) - SQL parameter style fixed for agentdb's SqlJsDatabase wrapper - HNSW index schema mismatch resolved with pattern_id column - Hooks now save to correct database (.agentic-qe/agentdb.db) ## New Features - Added 5 SwarmMemoryManager methods for learning data retrieval: - getBestAction() - Q-learning best action selection - getRecentLearningExperiences() - Recent experience retrieval - getLearningExperiencesByTaskType() - Task-filtered experiences - getHighRewardExperiences() - Successful experience extraction - getLearningStats() - Aggregate learning statistics - Added comprehensive integration test for memory/learning loop - Added RuVector pattern store integration (experimental) ## Technical Details - Vector embeddings: 384 dimensions × 4 bytes = 1,536 bytes per pattern - All 12 integration tests pass - HNSW index: 150x faster vector search enabled 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: move ARM64-only ruvector packages to optionalDependencies Fixes CI failures caused by platform-specific dependencies: - @ruvector/node-linux-arm64-gnu (ARM64 only) - ruvector-core-linux-arm64-gnu (ARM64 only) These packages caused npm ci to fail on x64 CI runners with: "EBADPLATFORM - wanted linux/arm64, current linux/x64" Solution: Move ARM64 packages to optionalDependencies and add x64 variants for cross-platform compatibility. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore: regenerate package-lock.json with x64 ruvector packages Updates lockfile to include optional x64 platform packages for CI compatibility: - @ruvector/node-linux-x64-gnu@0.1.17 - ruvector-core-linux-x64-gnu@0.1.15 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: replace fake QUIC with proper implementation and clean up skills manifest QUIC Transport: - Remove fake HTTP/2-based QUICTransport.ts that pretended to be QUIC - Add proper QUIC implementation via Rust/WASM (@agentic-flow/quic-wasm) - Add WebSocket fallback transport for when WASM unavailable - Add dedicated type declarations for optional WASM module - Features: 0-RTT connection, stream multiplexing, TLS 1.3 built-in Skills Manifest: - Rewrite skills-manifest.json with only QE skills (41 skills) - Remove Claude Flow platform skills (agentdb-*, flow-nexus-*, github-*, etc.) - Organize into proper categories: qe-core, testing-methodologies, etc. Bug Fixes: - Fix UnifiedMemoryCoordinator.ts TypeScript errors - Use Logger.getInstance() instead of private constructor - Use swarmMemory.query() instead of non-existent list() method - Use correct close() method signatures for backends 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat: add QX Partner agent, compact subagents, fix CLAUDE.md dynamic counts - Add QX Partner agent for Quality Experience analysis combining QA + UX perspectives - Compact 9 subagent definitions to ~80 lines each (88% reduction) - Fix CLAUDE.md template to dynamically count agents (including subagents) and skills - Move CLAUDE.md creation after parallel phases for accurate counts - Remove 'Production-Ready' claim from README and CHANGELOG - Clean up backup files and move docs to proper directory Initialization now correctly reports: - 31 QE Agents (20 main + 11 subagents) - 53 QE Skills - 8 Slash Commands 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: resolve CI failures and security alert #36 - Replace MD5 with SHA-256 for ETag calculation (security alert #36) - Fix CRLF line endings in shell scripts causing parse errors - Remove 'local' keyword from for-loop in test-integration-batched.sh - Use dynamic process.cwd() instead of hardcoded path in jest.config.js - Enhance quality-gate.ts to parse test logs when results file missing 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat: Complete Agentic QE Fleet v2.1 implementation (closes #101) ## Implemented Features ### Error Recovery Enhancement (Task 1.3) - CircuitBreaker class with state management (CLOSED/OPEN/HALF_OPEN) - RetryStrategy with exponential/linear/constant backoff - RecoveryOrchestrator with 6 recovery strategies - Transport fallback mechanisms ### Dynamic Skill Loader (Task 2.2) - Metadata-only initial loading (98% token reduction) - On-demand full skill retrieval - LRU caching with configurable TTL (30min default) - Preload suggestions for critical workflows ### Swarm Learning Optimizer (Task 4.1) - Topology recommendation engine (hierarchical/mesh/ring/star) - Agent allocation with capability matching and load balancing - Bottleneck detection (agent/memory/coordination/IO) - Real-time performance adjustments - Added getLatestRecommendation() method ### Workflow Orchestrator (Task 4.2) - AdaptiveScheduler with dynamic strategy selection - Priority-based task queue with age boosting - Task dependency resolution - Work stealing and backpressure handling - Added getQueueDepth() and getStatus() methods ### Unified Memory Coordinator (Task 4.3) - Consolidated memory managers (SQLite, AgentDB, Vector, JSON) - Automatic failover chain with health monitoring - Batch operations and namespace isolation - Periodic sync between backends ### SwarmCoordinator Improvements - Real CPU utilization tracking via process.cpuUsage() - Queue depth from WorkflowOrchestrator - Optimizer recommendations in feedback data - Calculated average complexity from metrics ## Additional Changes - Migration documentation and test restructuring plan - GitHub issue templates and workflows - Test suite improvements and cleanup 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat: optimize 38 QE skills with agent-focused format (#102) - Add enhanced YAML frontmatter (tokenEstimate, agents, tags, etc.) - Add <default_to_action> blocks for immediate actionable guidance - Add Quick Reference Cards with tables for at-a-glance info - Add Agent Integration examples using Task() pattern - Add Agent Coordination Hints (memory namespace + fleet coordination) - Condense content optimized for agent consumption - Reduce total token footprint by ~65% across skills Skills updated: - Core QE: agentic-quality-engineering, holistic-testing-pact - Testing Types: api-testing, chaos-engineering, compatibility, compliance, contract, database, exploratory, localization, mobile, mutation, performance, regression, security, visual-testing - Methodologies: tdd-london-chicago, xp-practices, context-driven, risk-based, shift-left, shift-right - Analysis: code-review-quality, quality-metrics, test-design-techniques - Strategy: test-automation-strategy, test-data-management, test-environment-management, test-reporting-analytics - CI/CD: cicd-pipeline-qe-orchestrator, accessibility-testing - Communication: brutal-honesty-review, bug-reporting-excellence, consultancy-practices, sherlock-review, six-thinking-hats, technical-writing - Refactoring: refactoring-patterns Also includes: package.json updates, docs/optimization/, docs/templates/, scripts/validate-skill-optimization.ts Skipped: testability-scoring (pending PR from @fndlalit) 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * release: v2.1.0 - Comprehensive QX Analysis & Skills Optimization ## Summary - Comprehensive QX Analysis with 23+ heuristics (PR #104 by @fndlalit) - 38 QE Skills optimized with agent-focused format (PR #102) - Testability Scoring skill v2.1 with optimized format - QX Partner Agent v2.1 with enhanced capabilities - Fix MCP SDK compatibility for @modelcontextprotocol/sdk bump (PR #105) ## Changes - .claude/agents/qx-partner.md: Updated to v2.1 with domain-specific detection - .claude/skills/testability-scoring/SKILL.md: Optimized format (59% token reduction) - src/mcp/server.ts: Removed deprecated 'description' field for MCP SDK compatibility - package.json: Bumped version to 2.1.0 - README.md: Updated version and release notes - CHANGELOG.md: Added v2.1.0 release notes 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
522 lines
15 KiB
Markdown
522 lines
15 KiB
Markdown
# Claude 4.5 Skill Optimization Patterns
|
||
|
||
## Executive Summary
|
||
|
||
This guide defines best practices for optimizing Agentic QE skills for Claude 4.5, targeting **40-50% token reduction** while improving agent coordination and maintaining quality.
|
||
|
||
**Key Achievements:**
|
||
- Token reduction: 40-50% target (e.g., 2,600 → 1,300-1,560 tokens)
|
||
- Improved agent coordination through structured hints
|
||
- Enhanced Claude 4.5 action-first directive patterns
|
||
- Standardized metadata and implementation tracking
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Core Optimization Principles
|
||
|
||
### 1. Action-First Directive Pattern
|
||
|
||
Claude 4.5 excels with immediate, actionable directives at the top of skills.
|
||
|
||
#### ❌ Before (Token-Heavy)
|
||
```markdown
|
||
# Performance Testing
|
||
|
||
## Why Performance Testing Matters
|
||
|
||
Performance is a feature, not an afterthought. Modern users expect...
|
||
|
||
### User Impact
|
||
- 100ms delay = 1% drop in conversions
|
||
- 53% of mobile users abandon...
|
||
|
||
## Types of Performance Testing
|
||
|
||
### 1. Load Testing
|
||
What: System behavior under expected load...
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
#### ✅ After (Action-First)
|
||
```markdown
|
||
# Performance Testing
|
||
|
||
<default_to_action>
|
||
When performance testing is requested:
|
||
1. IDENTIFY critical paths (checkout, search, APIs)
|
||
2. DEFINE SLOs: p95 response time, throughput, error rate
|
||
3. SELECT test type: Load (typical usage) → Stress (breaking point) → Spike (sudden surge) → Endurance (24h+)
|
||
4. RUN k6/JMeter with realistic scenarios (user journeys, think time, varied data)
|
||
5. MONITOR: Response time percentiles, throughput, errors, CPU/memory/DB
|
||
6. ANALYZE bottlenecks: Database (indexes, N+1 queries), Sync ops, Memory leaks, Caching gaps
|
||
7. REPORT with baselines and trends
|
||
|
||
**Quick Decision Matrix:**
|
||
- Before release → Load + Stress tests
|
||
- Infrastructure change → Scalability test
|
||
- Major event → Spike test
|
||
- New features → Endurance test (24-72h)
|
||
</default_to_action>
|
||
|
||
## Performance Test Types
|
||
|
||
**Load Testing**: Expected traffic (e.g., 1K users, 10K req/min)
|
||
**Stress Testing**: Beyond capacity → find breaking point
|
||
**Spike Testing**: Sudden surge (Black Friday, viral posts)
|
||
**Endurance/Soak**: 24-72h → detect memory leaks
|
||
**Scalability**: Validate horizontal/vertical scaling
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Benefits:**
|
||
- Immediate actionable guidance (Claude starts working instantly)
|
||
- 60-70% token reduction in introductory content
|
||
- Critical decision points highlighted
|
||
- Clear workflow progression
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### 2. Structured Output Templates
|
||
|
||
Use YAML frontmatter and structured sections for efficient parsing.
|
||
|
||
#### Metadata Block (YAML Frontmatter)
|
||
```yaml
|
||
---
|
||
name: performance-testing
|
||
category: specialized-testing
|
||
priority: high
|
||
tokenEstimate: 1300
|
||
agents: [qe-performance-tester]
|
||
implementation_status: optimized
|
||
optimization_version: 1.0
|
||
last_optimized: 2025-12-02
|
||
dependencies: [agentic-quality-engineering]
|
||
quick_reference_card: true
|
||
---
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Required Fields:**
|
||
- `name`: Skill identifier (kebab-case)
|
||
- `category`: From skills-manifest.json
|
||
- `priority`: critical | high | medium | low
|
||
- `tokenEstimate`: Target after optimization
|
||
- `agents`: Array of associated QE agents
|
||
- `implementation_status`: draft | baseline | optimized | production
|
||
- `optimization_version`: Semantic version
|
||
- `last_optimized`: ISO date
|
||
- `dependencies`: Required skills
|
||
- `quick_reference_card`: Boolean (must be true for optimized skills)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### 3. Token Compression Techniques
|
||
|
||
#### A. Remove Verbose Explanations
|
||
```markdown
|
||
❌ Before (256 tokens):
|
||
## Why Performance Testing Matters
|
||
|
||
### User Impact
|
||
Performance directly affects user experience and business metrics. Research shows that 100ms delay leads to 1% drop in conversions according to Amazon's studies. Google research indicates 53% of mobile users abandon sites taking more than 3 seconds to load. From a user's perspective, slow equals broken.
|
||
|
||
✅ After (64 tokens):
|
||
**Impact**: 100ms delay = 1% conversion drop (Amazon). 53% abandon sites >3s (Google). Slow = Broken.
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Reduction:** 75% token savings
|
||
|
||
#### B. Use Tables for Dense Information
|
||
```markdown
|
||
❌ Before (180 tokens):
|
||
**k6**: Modern, developer-friendly, JavaScript-based load testing tool. Good for CI/CD integration and API testing. Has a low learning curve.
|
||
|
||
**JMeter**: Mature, feature-rich, GUI-based load testing tool. Good for complex scenarios and extensive protocol support. Has a medium learning curve.
|
||
|
||
✅ After (72 tokens):
|
||
| Tool | Best For | Learning Curve |
|
||
|------|----------|----------------|
|
||
| k6 | CI/CD, APIs, modern workflows | Low |
|
||
| JMeter | Complex scenarios, GUI | Medium |
|
||
| Gatling | High load, detailed metrics | Medium |
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Reduction:** 60% token savings
|
||
|
||
#### C. Consolidate Redundant Content
|
||
```markdown
|
||
❌ Before (320 tokens):
|
||
### 1. Load Testing
|
||
What: System behavior under expected load
|
||
Goal: Verify the system handles typical usage
|
||
Example: E-commerce site handling 1,000 concurrent users
|
||
When: Before every major release
|
||
|
||
### 2. Stress Testing
|
||
What: System behavior under extreme load
|
||
Goal: Find breaking point, see how system fails
|
||
Example: Ramping up from 1,000 to 10,000 users
|
||
When: Before scaling infrastructure
|
||
|
||
✅ After (128 tokens):
|
||
**Test Types:**
|
||
- **Load**: Expected traffic (1K users) → Before releases
|
||
- **Stress**: Beyond capacity (1K→10K users) → Find breaking point
|
||
- **Spike**: Sudden surge (Black Friday) → Test auto-scaling
|
||
- **Endurance**: 24-72h at normal load → Memory leaks
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Reduction:** 60% token savings
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### 4. Quick Reference Card Format
|
||
|
||
Every optimized skill must include a quick reference card for rapid agent coordination.
|
||
|
||
```markdown
|
||
## Quick Reference Card
|
||
|
||
### When to Use
|
||
- Planning load testing strategy
|
||
- Investigating performance issues
|
||
- Setting performance baselines
|
||
- Optimizing system bottlenecks
|
||
|
||
### Key Actions
|
||
1. Define SLOs (p95 < 200ms, throughput > 10K req/min, error < 0.1%)
|
||
2. Identify critical paths (revenue flows, high-traffic pages)
|
||
3. Run appropriate test type (Load/Stress/Spike/Endurance)
|
||
4. Monitor: Response time percentiles, throughput, errors, resources
|
||
5. Analyze bottlenecks (DB, N+1, sync ops, memory, cache)
|
||
6. Report with baselines and trends
|
||
|
||
### Tools Selection
|
||
- **k6**: Modern CI/CD, APIs (Low learning curve)
|
||
- **JMeter**: Complex scenarios, GUI (Medium)
|
||
- **Gatling**: High load, reporting (Medium)
|
||
|
||
### Common Bottlenecks
|
||
- **Database**: Missing indexes, N+1 queries, connection pool exhaustion
|
||
- **Synchronous**: Blocking operations in request path (use queues)
|
||
- **Memory Leaks**: Event listeners, unbounded caches, circular refs
|
||
- **Caching**: Under-utilized or misconfigured
|
||
|
||
### Pass/Fail Criteria
|
||
✅ p95 < target, error rate < 0.1%, CPU < 70%, memory < 80%
|
||
❌ Response time > 2x target, error rate > 1%, resources maxed
|
||
|
||
### Agent Coordination
|
||
- `qe-performance-tester`: Orchestrates load testing and analysis
|
||
- `qe-quality-analyzer`: Interprets results and trends
|
||
- `qe-production-intelligence`: Compares to production baselines
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Benefits:**
|
||
- 200-400 token quick scan section
|
||
- Enables rapid agent decision-making
|
||
- Provides context for fleet coordination
|
||
- Clear pass/fail criteria
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Agent Integration Patterns
|
||
|
||
### Coordination Hints Section
|
||
|
||
```markdown
|
||
## Agent Coordination Hints
|
||
|
||
### Memory Namespace
|
||
Store performance data in: `aqe/performance/{test-type}/{timestamp}`
|
||
|
||
**Schema:**
|
||
```json
|
||
{
|
||
"testType": "load|stress|spike|endurance",
|
||
"target": "https://api.example.com",
|
||
"duration": "5m",
|
||
"virtualUsers": 100,
|
||
"results": {
|
||
"p50": 120,
|
||
"p95": 180,
|
||
"p99": 250,
|
||
"errorRate": 0.003,
|
||
"throughput": 5420
|
||
},
|
||
"bottlenecks": ["database:slow-query:orders.user_id"],
|
||
"recommendations": ["Add index on orders.user_id"]
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Coordination Flow
|
||
1. **qe-performance-tester** → Run tests, store results in memory
|
||
2. **qe-quality-analyzer** → Retrieve results, analyze trends
|
||
3. **qe-production-intelligence** → Compare to production baselines
|
||
4. **qe-deployment-readiness** → Go/no-go decision based on thresholds
|
||
|
||
### Blackboard Patterns
|
||
Post to: `performance/test-completed` with priority `high`
|
||
Subscribe to: `quality/gate-evaluation` for deployment decisions
|
||
|
||
### Cross-Agent Dependencies
|
||
- Requires: `agentic-quality-engineering` (foundational PACT principles)
|
||
- Complements: `api-testing-patterns` (for API performance testing)
|
||
- Informs: `quality-metrics` (for dashboard integration)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Implementation Status Metadata
|
||
|
||
Track optimization progress with implementation status:
|
||
|
||
```yaml
|
||
implementation_status: optimized
|
||
optimization_details:
|
||
baseline_tokens: 2600
|
||
optimized_tokens: 1300
|
||
reduction_percent: 50
|
||
optimization_date: 2025-12-02
|
||
optimizer: "claude-sonnet-4-5"
|
||
validation_status: "passed"
|
||
agent_tested: [qe-performance-tester]
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Status Levels:**
|
||
- `draft`: Initial creation, not production-ready
|
||
- `baseline`: Original version before optimization
|
||
- `optimized`: Underwent Claude 4.5 optimization
|
||
- `production`: Validated with real agents, battle-tested
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Optimization Workflow
|
||
|
||
### Phase 1: Baseline Analysis
|
||
```bash
|
||
# Count tokens in original skill
|
||
npm run count-tokens .claude/skills/performance-testing/SKILL.md
|
||
|
||
# Record baseline
|
||
Baseline: 2,600 tokens
|
||
Target: 1,300-1,560 tokens (40-50% reduction)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Phase 2: Apply Patterns
|
||
1. **Add YAML frontmatter** with metadata
|
||
2. **Insert `<default_to_action>` block** at top
|
||
3. **Create quick reference card**
|
||
4. **Compress verbose sections**:
|
||
- Convert paragraphs to bullet lists
|
||
- Use tables for comparisons
|
||
- Remove redundant explanations
|
||
5. **Add agent coordination section**
|
||
6. **Update implementation_status**
|
||
|
||
### Phase 3: Validation
|
||
```bash
|
||
# Validate structure
|
||
npm run validate-skill .claude/skills/performance-testing/SKILL.md
|
||
|
||
# Test with agent
|
||
Task("Performance test", "Run load test on staging API", "qe-performance-tester")
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Phase 4: Metrics Collection
|
||
```yaml
|
||
optimization_metrics:
|
||
before: 2600 tokens
|
||
after: 1300 tokens
|
||
reduction: 50%
|
||
validation_passed: true
|
||
agent_feedback: "Excellent clarity, immediate action guidance"
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Token Reduction Strategies by Section
|
||
|
||
### Introduction (Target: 80% reduction)
|
||
**Before:** 400 tokens of philosophy and context
|
||
**After:** 50-80 tokens in `<default_to_action>` block
|
||
|
||
### Core Content (Target: 40% reduction)
|
||
**Before:** 1,800 tokens with verbose explanations
|
||
**After:** 1,080 tokens with tables, lists, and structured formats
|
||
|
||
### Examples (Target: 30% reduction)
|
||
**Before:** 300 tokens with full code blocks
|
||
**After:** 210 tokens with minimal, essential examples
|
||
|
||
### Agent Integration (NEW: +150 tokens)
|
||
**Added:** Agent coordination hints, memory schemas, fleet patterns
|
||
|
||
**Net Result:** 2,600 → 1,300 tokens (50% reduction)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Quality Assurance Checklist
|
||
|
||
Before marking a skill as `optimized`, verify:
|
||
|
||
- [ ] YAML frontmatter present with all required fields
|
||
- [ ] `<default_to_action>` block at top (100-200 tokens)
|
||
- [ ] Quick reference card section included
|
||
- [ ] Agent coordination hints section present
|
||
- [ ] Token estimate ≤ baseline × 0.6 (40%+ reduction)
|
||
- [ ] All agents from manifest referenced
|
||
- [ ] Dependencies listed correctly
|
||
- [ ] Implementation status updated
|
||
- [ ] Tested with at least one agent
|
||
- [ ] Cross-references to related skills updated
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Anti-Patterns to Avoid
|
||
|
||
### ❌ Over-Compression
|
||
```markdown
|
||
**Bad:** Load test: sys behavior @ expected load. Run b4 release.
|
||
```
|
||
**Issue:** Loses clarity, becomes cryptic
|
||
|
||
**Better:** Load Testing: System behavior under expected traffic (1K users). Run before releases.
|
||
|
||
### ❌ Removing Critical Context
|
||
```markdown
|
||
**Bad:** p95 < 200ms
|
||
```
|
||
**Issue:** No explanation of why or when
|
||
|
||
**Better:** **SLO:** p95 response time < 200ms (95% of requests complete in under 200ms)
|
||
|
||
### ❌ Eliminating Examples
|
||
```markdown
|
||
**Bad:** Use k6 for load testing.
|
||
```
|
||
**Issue:** No guidance on how
|
||
|
||
**Better:**
|
||
```javascript
|
||
// k6 load test example
|
||
export const options = {
|
||
stages: [{ duration: '1m', target: 50 }],
|
||
thresholds: { http_req_duration: ['p(95)<200'] }
|
||
};
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Template Usage Guidelines
|
||
|
||
### Selecting the Right Template
|
||
|
||
**New Skill (from scratch):**
|
||
```bash
|
||
cp docs/templates/optimized-skill-template.md .claude/skills/my-new-skill/SKILL.md
|
||
# Fill in all sections
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Optimizing Existing Skill:**
|
||
```bash
|
||
# 1. Read original skill
|
||
# 2. Extract core content
|
||
# 3. Apply optimization patterns from this guide
|
||
# 4. Validate with script
|
||
npm run validate-skill .claude/skills/my-skill/SKILL.md
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Metrics Dashboard
|
||
|
||
Track optimization progress:
|
||
|
||
```yaml
|
||
fleet_optimization_status:
|
||
total_skills: 41
|
||
optimized: 0
|
||
in_progress: 0
|
||
baseline: 41
|
||
|
||
target_reduction: 45% # (40-50% range midpoint)
|
||
|
||
token_savings:
|
||
estimated_before: 90000 # 41 skills × ~2200 avg
|
||
estimated_after: 49500 # 45% reduction
|
||
savings: 40500 tokens
|
||
|
||
priority_order:
|
||
critical: [agentic-quality-engineering, holistic-testing-pact]
|
||
high: [tdd-london-chicago, api-testing-patterns, cicd-pipeline-qe-orchestrator, ...]
|
||
medium: [security-testing, performance-testing, ...]
|
||
low: [consultancy-practices, technical-writing]
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Advanced Patterns
|
||
|
||
### Conditional Content Loading
|
||
```markdown
|
||
<default_to_action>
|
||
**Quick Start:**
|
||
For rapid testing → See [Quick Reference Card](#quick-reference-card)
|
||
For comprehensive strategy → See [Detailed Methodology](#detailed-methodology)
|
||
For troubleshooting → See [Common Issues](#common-issues)
|
||
</default_to_action>
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Cross-Skill References
|
||
```markdown
|
||
## Related Skills
|
||
**Prerequisites:** [agentic-quality-engineering](../agentic-quality-engineering/) (PACT principles)
|
||
**Complements:** [api-testing-patterns](../api-testing-patterns/) (API performance)
|
||
**Informs:** [quality-metrics](../quality-metrics/) (dashboard integration)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Versioned Optimization
|
||
```yaml
|
||
optimization_history:
|
||
- version: 1.0
|
||
date: 2025-12-02
|
||
tokens: 1300
|
||
reduction: 50%
|
||
notes: "Initial Claude 4.5 optimization"
|
||
- version: 0.9
|
||
date: 2025-11-15
|
||
tokens: 2600
|
||
notes: "Baseline before optimization"
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Success Metrics
|
||
|
||
**Target Achievement:**
|
||
- ✅ 40-50% token reduction across all 41 skills
|
||
- ✅ <300ms agent skill loading time
|
||
- ✅ 100% skills have quick reference cards
|
||
- ✅ Zero quality regression in agent effectiveness
|
||
- ✅ Improved coordination through structured hints
|
||
|
||
**Validation Methods:**
|
||
1. **Token Counting:** Automated script validation
|
||
2. **Agent Testing:** Real agent execution with optimized skills
|
||
3. **Coordination Flow:** Multi-agent workflows with memory sharing
|
||
4. **User Feedback:** Manual review of optimization quality
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## References
|
||
|
||
- **Claude 4.5 Best Practices:** Action-first directives, structured output
|
||
- **Skills Manifest:** `/workspaces/agentic-qe-cf/.claude/skills/skills-manifest.json`
|
||
- **Validation Script:** `/workspaces/agentic-qe-cf/scripts/validate-skill-optimization.ts`
|
||
- **Template:** `/workspaces/agentic-qe-cf/docs/templates/optimized-skill-template.md`
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
**Document Version:** 1.0
|
||
**Last Updated:** 2025-12-02
|
||
**Maintained By:** Agentic QE Fleet Architecture Team
|