mirror of
https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates.git
synced 2026-09-19 01:30:23 +08:00
Dani
054c0e56e9
Removed the deprecated 'model: sonnet' field from command frontmatter to fix compatibility issues with Claude Code. Commands will now inherit the model from the active conversation instead of using a hardcoded deprecated model identifier. Changes: - Removed 'model: sonnet' from 142 command files across all categories - Commands now use default model inheritance behavior - Preserved 'model: claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929' in gemini-review.md (valid model) - 67 commands without model field remain unchanged This resolves the "model: sonnet not found" error reported in GitHub issues and aligns with Claude Code's recommended practice of letting commands inherit the conversation model. Affected categories: - Database/Supabase commands (8 files) - Documentation commands (8 files) - Deployment commands (11 files) - Setup commands (14 files) - Performance commands (8 files) - Team commands (14 files) - Security commands (6 files) - NextJS/Vercel commands (10 files) - Sync commands (14 files) - And more across other categories 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
36 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, WebSearch
|
|
argument-hint: [simulation-type] | --business | --technical | --behavioral | --strategic
|
|
description: Calibrate simulation accuracy with systematic validation, bias detection, and continuous improvement
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Simulation Calibrator
|
|
|
|
Calibrate simulation accuracy with comprehensive validation and continuous improvement: **$ARGUMENTS**
|
|
|
|
## Current Simulation State
|
|
|
|
- Simulation type: Based on $ARGUMENTS (business, technical, behavioral, strategic simulation)
|
|
- Accuracy requirements: Mission-critical (95%+), strategic (80-95%), or exploratory (50-70%)
|
|
- Validation data: Historical outcomes, real-world benchmarks, and expert assessments
|
|
- Performance metrics: Current accuracy levels and improvement opportunities
|
|
|
|
## Task
|
|
|
|
Implement systematic simulation calibration with comprehensive accuracy improvement:
|
|
|
|
**Simulation Type**: Use $ARGUMENTS to calibrate business simulations, technical models, behavioral predictions, or strategic scenarios
|
|
|
|
**Calibration Framework**:
|
|
1. **Baseline Assessment** - Historical validation, accuracy metrics, and error pattern analysis
|
|
2. **Bias Detection** - Systematic identification of cognitive, data, and model biases with mitigation strategies
|
|
3. **Validation Loops** - Multi-level validation with internal consistency, expert review, and empirical testing
|
|
4. **Real-Time Calibration** - Continuous monitoring, automated adjustments, and adaptive learning integration
|
|
5. **Quality Assurance** - Meta-calibration assessment and improvement sustainability
|
|
6. **Improvement Roadmap** - Systematic enhancement strategies with performance tracking
|
|
|
|
**Advanced Features**: Automated bias detection, machine learning calibration, cross-simulation learning, and predictive accuracy optimization.
|
|
|
|
**Quality Control**: Independent validation, benchmark comparison, and comprehensive documentation for institutional learning.
|
|
|
|
**Output**: Calibrated simulation with validated accuracy metrics, bias correction reports, continuous improvement systems, and enhanced decision support reliability. |