With the migration to husky@5, the environment variable used to skip husky changed from
`HUSKY_SKIP_HOOKS` to `HUSKY`. To continue skipping husky during the merge process as
expected, the environment variable used is updated.
PR Close#40025
Previously, due to the way the AngularJS and Angular clean-up processes
interfere with each other when removing an AngularJS element that
contains a downgraded Angular component, the data associated with the
host element of the downgraded component was not removed. This data was
kept in an internal AngularJS cache, which prevented the element and
component instance from being garbage-collected, leading to memory
leaks.
This commit fixes this by ensuring the element data is explicitly
removed when cleaning up a downgraded component.
NOTE:
This is essentially the equivalent of #26209 but for downgraded (instead
of upgraded) components.
Fixes#39911Closes#39921
PR Close#39965
The previous image referred to "Mr IQ". The example application
(and the content of the referring guide) actually uses "Dr IQ".
Closes#34823
PR Close#40022
The previous tutorial content referred to a `Routes` member of
`AppRoutingModule`, which is not correct. Instead there is a
`routes` variable that is passed to the `forRoot()` method when
configuring the `AppRoutingModule`.
Replaces #36583
PR Close#40023
1. In line 25 changed the word "components" to "component's".
2. In line 66 changed the phrase "you never refer to them" to "you should never refer to them".
3. Appended the paragraph containing the above phrase in a `div` with the class `alert is-helpful`.
PR Close#39246
Remove the statements where mentions the component in the `entryComponents`
array inside `NgModule` metadata.
This is not required since Angular version 9.
PR Close#39242
Aside from using the @input() decorator, we can use the @Attrbitute decorator too.
Of course, those two are different and support different causes.
I expected to see a working example on the Attribute Bindings section, but I didn't find one.
This PR depicts the usage of the Attribute decorator between two components
PR Close#38721
after angular version 8 string based lazy loading is not activated by default it is an opt in behaviour in which you have to add the lazy loaded routes in the tsconfig file for compilation. Aded a note too that it will be removed in version 11.
Fixes#35652
PR Close#35956
Add a TaggedTemplateExpr to represent tagged template literals in
Angular's syntax tree (more specifically Expression in output_ast.ts).
Also update classes that implement ExpressionVisitor to add support for
tagged template literals in different contexts, such as JIT compilation
and conversion to JS.
Partial support for tagged template literals had already been
implemented to support the $localize tag used by Angular's i18n
framework. Where applicable, this code was refactored to support
arbitrary tags, although completely replacing the i18n-specific support
for the $localize tag with the new generic support for tagged template
literals may not be completely trivial, and is left as future work.
PR Close#39122
Add test for when `checkTypeOfDomReferences = false` to ensure that we
do not regress in behavior at any point. The desired behavior for this
case is that the `TemplateTypeChecker` will honor the user's
configuration and not produce symbols for the dom reference.
PR Close#39539
Remove the check-env script as it is not longer relied on and only surfaces
false positives/known mismatches at this point.
Since our tooling now acts using vendored code where needed, this is no
longer as necessary as it previously was.
PR Close#39980
Previously, when a PR which does not target the master branch in the Github UI was
merged it would not close automatically. This change detects when this case occurs
and closes the PR via the Github API.
For example:
A PR which targets the 11.0.x branch in the Github UI has the `target: patch` label
This PR is only pushed into the 11.0.x branch, which does not trigger Github's
reference based actions to close the PR.
PR Close#39979
We intend to run the `@angular/upgrade` tests against all supported
versions of AngularJS (v1.5+). Previously, we only ran them against
v1.5, v1.6 and v1.7.
Since AngularJS v1.8 was released recently, this commit adds it to the
list of AngularJS versions we test against.
PR Close#39972
This commit adds `ngDevMode` guard to call `_ngModelWarning` only
in dev mode (similar to how things work in other parts of Ivy runtime code).
The `ngDevMode` flag helps to tree-shake this function from production builds
(since it will act as no-op, in dev mode everything will work as it works right now)
to decrease production bundle size.
PR Close#39964
This commit adds ngDevMode guard to show warning only
in dev mode (similar to how things work in other parts of Ivy runtime code).
The ngDevMode flag helps to tree-shake this warning from production builds
(in dev mode everything will work as it works right now) to decrease production bundle size.
PR Close#39964
This commit adds ngDevMode guard to show warnings only
in dev mode (similar to how things work in other parts of Ivy runtime code).
The ngDevMode flag helps to tree-shake these warnings from production builds
(in dev mode everything will work as it works right now) to decrease production bundle size.
PR Close#39964
This commit adds `ngDevMode` guard to run `checkNoChanges` only
in dev mode (similar to how things work in other parts of Ivy runtime code).
The `ngDevMode` flag helps to tree-shake this code from production builds
(in dev mode everything will work as it works right now) to decrease production bundle size.
PR Close#39964
When the compiler is invoked via ngc or the Angular CLI, its APIs are used
under the assumption that Angular analysis/diagnostics are only requested if
the program has no TypeScript-level errors. A result of this assumption is
that the incremental engine has not needed to resolve changes via its
dependency graph when the program contained broken imports, since broken
imports are a TypeScript error.
The Angular Language Service for Ivy is using the compiler as a backend, and
exercising its incremental compilation APIs without enforcing this
assumption. As a result, the Language Service has run into issues where
broken imports cause incremental compilation to fail and produce incorrect
results.
This commit introduces a mechanism within the compiler to keep track of
files for which dependency analysis has failed, and to always treat such
files as potentially affected by future incremental steps.
PR Close#39967
To avoid overwhelming a user with secondary diagnostics that derive from a
"root cause" error, the compiler has the notion of a "poisoned" NgModule.
An NgModule becomes poisoned when its declaration contains semantic errors:
declarations which are not components or pipes, imports which are not other
NgModules, etc. An NgModule also becomes poisoned if it imports or exports
another poisoned NgModule.
Previously, the compiler tracked this poisoned status as an alternate state
for each scope. Either a correct scope could be produced, or the entire
scope would be set to a sentinel error value. This meant that the compiler
would not track any information about a scope that was determined to be in
error.
This method presents several issues:
1. The compiler is unable to support the language service and return results
when a component or its module scope is poisoned.
This is fine for compilation, since diagnostics will be produced showing the
error(s), but the language service needs to still work for incorrect code.
2. `getComponentScopes()` does not return components with a poisoned scope,
which interferes with resource tracking of incremental builds.
If the component isn't included in that list, then the NgModule for it will
not have its dependencies properly tracked, and this can cause future
incremental build steps to produce incorrect results.
This commit changes the tracking of poisoned module scopes to use a flag on
the scope itself, rather than a sentinel value that replaces the scope. This
means that the scope itself will still be tracked, even if it contains
semantic errors.
PR Close#39967
Previously, if a trait's analysis step resulted in diagnostics, the trait
would be considered "errored" and no further operations, including register,
would be performed. Effectively, this meant that the compiler would pretend
the class in question was actually undecorated.
However, this behavior is problematic for several reasons:
1. It leads to inaccurate diagnostics being reported downstream.
For example, if a component is put into the error state, for example due to
a template error, the NgModule which declares the component would produce a
diagnostic claiming that the declaration is neither a directive nor a pipe.
This happened because the compiler wouldn't register() the component trait,
so the component would not be recorded as actually being a directive.
2. It can cause incorrect behavior on incremental builds.
This bug is more complex, but the general issue is that if the compiler
fails to associate a component and its module, then incremental builds will
not correctly re-analyze the module when the component's template changes.
Failing to register the component as such is one link in the larger chain of
issues that result in these kinds of issues.
3. It lumps together diagnostics produced during analysis and resolve steps.
This is not causing issues currently as the dependency graph ensures the
right classes are re-analyzed when needed, instead of showing stale
diagnostics. However, the dependency graph was not intended to serve this
role, and could potentially be optimized in ways that would break this
functionality.
This commit removes the concept of an "errored" trait entirely from the
trait system. Instead, analyzed and resolved traits have corresponding (and
separate) diagnostics, in addition to potentially `null` analysis results.
Analysis (but not resolution) diagnostics are carried forward during
incremental build operations. Compilation (emit) is only performed when
a trait reaches the resolved state with no diagnostics.
This change is functionally different than before as the `register` step is
now performed even in the presence of analysis errors, as long as analysis
results are also produced. This fixes problem 1 above, and is part of the
larger solution to problem 2.
PR Close#39967
Joey Perrott