### What problem does this PR solve?
Closes#14773.
Today, Pipeline (`rag/flow/`) chunking strategies only run as part of a
dataset ingestion that always embeds and indexes the result. There is no
way to drive Pipeline-style chunking from an Agent workflow without
paying that vectorization/persistence cost.
This PR adds a single new Agent component, `PipelineChunker`, that:
- Takes one or more file references (from `Begin` / `UserFillUp`
uploads) as input.
- Runs the existing `rag.app.*` chunking strategies (`naive`, `paper`,
`qa`, `manual`, `book`, `presentation`, `laws`, `table`, `one`, `email`,
`picture`, `audio`, `resume`, `tag`) against each file.
- Emits the resulting chunks as `chunks: list[str]` and `chunks_full:
list[dict]` for downstream Agent nodes.
- Performs **no embedding and no persistence** — chunks live only in
canvas variables for the duration of the run, exactly as requested in
the issue.
The component is auto-discovered by `agent/component/__init__.py`; no
registry edits required. Chunker functions are imported lazily so the
component itself does not pull `deepdoc` / OCR / VLM at
component-discovery time. File resolution mirrors the existing
`ExcelProcessor` convention.
Out of scope for this PR (potential follow-ups):
- Vectorization / KB persistence (explicit ask in the issue).
- Frontend canvas UI for the new component.
- Bridging to the newer Pydantic-based `rag/flow/chunker/TokenChunker`
(consumes a parser node's structured output rather than a raw file — a
separate, larger feature).
### Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Refactoring
- [ ] Performance Improvement
- [ ] Other (please describe):
---
## Files changed
- `agent/component/pipeline_chunker.py` — new component (~180 lines)
- `test/unit_test/agent/test_pipeline_chunker.py` — unit tests (~120
lines)
## Test plan
- [x] `ruff check` on changed files — clean.
- [x] `ruff format` applied to the new component file.
- [x] `python -m py_compile` on both new files — both compile.
- [x] New unit test file carries `pytestmark = pytest.mark.p2` so it
runs under marker-filtered CI.
- [x] Every new function, method, and class has a docstring (CodeRabbit
80% docstring-coverage gate).
- [x] `python -m pytest test/unit_test/agent/test_pipeline_chunker.py -x
-q` — **7 passed in 1.95s** locally. Tests stub
`api.db.services.file_service` and `rag.app.*` so they exercise the
parameter validation and parser-id lookup table without requiring the
full backend / model stack.
## Manual integration plan (post-merge)
1. Drop the component into an Agent canvas after a `Begin` node with a
file input.
2. Set `parser_id = "naive"` (or any other strategy) and reference the
file input in `inputs`.
3. Wire the `chunks` output into a downstream `LLM` / `Message` /
`Iteration` node — chunks are available as plain text without any
embedding or KB write.
Co-authored-by: John Baillie <johnbaillie2007@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Zhichang Yu <yuzhichang@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
`DeepLParam.check()` validated `self.top_n`, but DeepL has no such
parameter (it is not defined on the param class or its base), so
`check()` always raised `AttributeError` and a DeepL component could
never pass validation. Removed the bogus `top_n` check.
Also fixed the `_run` except branch, which computed
`be_output("**Error**...")` but never returned it, silently dropping the
error message.
Closes#16329
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] Add test cases
### Testing
Added `test/unit_test/agent/component/test_deepl.py` covering
`DeepLParam.check()` with valid defaults and rejection of invalid
source/target languages.
Replaces the Python agent canvas runtime with a Go implementation that
runs inside `cmd/server_main`.
The canvas compiles into an eino Workflow that pauses on wait-for-user
via native Interrupt/Resume (no sentinel flag) and resumes from a
Redis-backed CheckPointStore.
All 21 Python agent components and ~35 tools are ported with functional
parity.
Sandbox providers now read their JSON config from the admin-panel
system_settings table with env fallback.
234 files / +35,413 / -6,111. All Go files are gofmt-clean (CI gate
added); drops the v2 DSL E2E step and the gap-analysis plan (both
redundant after the port ships).
## Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
- [x] New feature
- [x] Bug fix
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Browser parsed sys.query from prompts but never called set_input_value,
so node_finished inputs displayed null in the agent orchestration run
log.
Additionally, Browser’s tenant-model path could trigger unsupported
structured-output modes (response_format/tool_choice) for some
OpenAI-compatible providers (notably DeepSeek thinking models), causing
step failures.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
---------
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
## What
- make `Switch` ignore conditions that have no evaluable items
- add a regression for blank `cpn_id` items falling through to the else
branch
- keep the existing non-empty `and` condition behavior covered
Fixes#15643.
## Verified
- `python -m py_compile agent\component\switch.py
test\unit_test\agent\component\test_switch.py`
- `python -m pytest test\unit_test\agent\component\test_switch.py -q` ->
`2 passed`
- `python -m ruff check agent\component\switch.py
test\unit_test\agent\component\test_switch.py`
- `git diff --check`
I also checked `python -m ruff format --check` on the touched files. It
would reformat pre-existing style in `agent/component/switch.py` beyond
this bug fix, so I kept the patch scoped instead of reformatting the
whole file.
### What problem does this PR solve?
This PR adds a new `Browser` operator to Agent workflows, enabling
prompt-driven browser automation in RAGFlow.Technically based
‘Browser-Use’
It includes:
- Backend browser component execution with tenant LLM integration
- Upload source support (file IDs, URLs, variables, CSV/JSON array)
- Downloaded file persistence to RAGFlow storage
- Frontend node/operator integration, form config, icon, and i18n
updates
- Unit tests for upload/download and ID parsing logic
- Dependency and Docker updates for browser-use runtime support
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feat: add local & ssh provider in admin panel
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feat: support local provider for code exec component & remove some
outdated models
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
