### What problem does this PR solve?
Python implementation of the Go-based model_provider API suite.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
---------
Co-authored-by: bill <yibie_jingnian@163.com>
Closes#14768
### What problem does this PR solve?
The `list_chats` and `list_searches` REST API endpoints did not enforce
authorization on the `owner_ids` query parameter. Any authenticated user
could pass arbitrary tenant IDs to `owner_ids` and retrieve chats or
search apps belonging to other tenants they are not a member of.
This PR resolves the issue by:
1. Looking up the current user's authorized tenants via
`TenantService.get_joined_tenants_by_user_id` and rejecting any
`owner_ids` that fall outside that set.
2. When no `owner_ids` are provided, scoping the query to only the
user's authorized tenants instead of returning an unfiltered result.
3. Adding unit tests that verify unauthorized `owner_ids` are rejected
with `OPERATING_ERROR`.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Addresses event-loop blocking under high concurrency reported in #13825.
When multiple requests hit the API simultaneously, synchronous DB/Redis
calls block the async event loop, preventing Quart from handling other
requests and causing cascading 502/504 timeouts.
This PR wraps all remaining blocking DB/Redis calls in `canvas_app.py`,
`chat_api.py`, `session.py`, and `canvas_service.py` with `await
thread_pool_exec()`
- Offload all synchronous `Service.*`, `REDIS_CONN.*`, and
`APIToken.query` calls to the thread pool
- Convert sync endpoint handlers (`list_chats`, `get_chat`, `templates`,
`sessions`, etc.) to `async def`
- Convert sync helper functions (`_ensure_owned_chat`,
`_validate_llm_id`, `_validate_dataset_ids`, etc.) to async - no
duplicate sync/async pairs
- Wrap `CanvasReplicaService` Redis IO calls (`bootstrap`,
`replace_for_set`, `commit_after_run`)
- Use `asyncio.gather()` for concurrent file uploads and chat response
building
**Note:** This fixes the code-level event-loop blocking, which is a
prerequisite for handling concurrent requests. For the full "30
concurrent requests without 502/504" goal described in the issue, users
should also tune deployment config:
- `WS=4` or higher (HTTP worker processes, default 1)
- `MAX_CONCURRENT_CHATS=50` (default 10)
- `SANDBOX_EXECUTOR_MANAGER_POOL_SIZE` for workflow-heavy workloads
### Performance verification
Reviewer asked for a before-vs-after comparison
([comment](https://github.com/infiniflow/ragflow/pull/13941#issuecomment-4393667231)).
I built a self-contained microbenchmark that reproduces the exact
failure mode this PR targets: an async handler that performs blocking
DB/Redis-style calls (50 ms each, 3 per request, 30 concurrent requests)
is run twice — once with the pre-PR pattern (sync call directly inside
the async handler) and once with the post-PR pattern (`await
thread_pool_exec(...)`). The benchmark imports nothing from RAGFlow
except `thread_pool_exec` itself, so it is hermetic and reproducible
(`THREAD_POOL_MAX_WORKERS=128`, Python 3.13.12).
**Throughput — wall-clock for 30 concurrent requests (lower is better)**
| flavour | wall(s) | p50(s) | p95(s) | max(s) |
|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|
| before | 4.986 | 0.158 | 0.207 | 0.269 |
| after | 0.248 | 0.181 | 0.230 | 0.231 |
The pre-PR handler serializes the entire load on the event-loop thread,
so 30 × 3 × 50 ms ≈ 4.5 s shows up as the wall time. The post-PR handler
parallelizes the blocking work across the thread pool and finishes the
same load in 248 ms — a **~20× speedup** on this workload.
**Event-loop responsiveness — latency of an unrelated probe coroutine
while the 30 slow requests are running (lower is better)**
| flavour | samples | probe p50 (ms) | probe p95 (ms) | probe max (ms) |
|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|
| before | 1 | 5442.26 | 5442.26 | 5442.26 |
| after | 28 | 0.88 | 11.53 | 98.02 |
This is the metric that maps directly to "the API still answers other
requests while one is busy". A 5 ms-interval probe was scheduled while
the 30 slow handlers ran. With the pre-PR code the event loop was frozen
for the entire duration of the blocking work, so only one probe sample
was ever picked up and it waited **5,442 ms**. After the PR, 28 probe
samples landed with **p50 0.88 ms / p95 11.53 ms**, meaning unrelated
requests are no longer starved by the slow ones. That is the regression
mode behind the cascading 502/504s reported in #13825.
<details>
<summary>Raw benchmark output</summary>
```
config: 30 concurrent requests, 3 blocking calls of 50ms each per request, THREAD_POOL_MAX_WORKERS=128
=== Throughput (lower wall is better) ===
flavour wall(s) p50(s) p95(s) max(s)
before 4.986 0.158 0.207 0.269
after 0.248 0.181 0.230 0.231
=== Event-loop responsiveness (lower probe latency is better) ===
flavour samples probe p50(ms) probe p95(ms) probe max(ms)
before 1 5442.26 5442.26 5442.26
after 28 0.88 11.53 98.02
```
</details>
The benchmark script is included as a comment on the PR for
reproducibility.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] Performance Improvement
Closes [#13825](https://github.com/infiniflow/ragflow/issues/13825)
---------
Co-authored-by: tmimmanuel <tmimmanuel@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kevin Hu <kevinhu.sh@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Fixes#14196
## Problem
When using DeepDOC to parse large PDFs (over 1000 pages), the parser
silently truncated processing at 300 pages due to a hardcoded default
`page_to=299` in `RAGFlowPdfParser.__images__()`. This caused:
- **Errors** on pages beyond the limit
- **Poor image quality** as the parser attempted to compensate with
missing page data
- **Inconsistent chunk splitting** between full PDF imports and partial
imports
Additionally, the codebase scattered magic numbers (`299`, `600`,
`10000`, `100000`, `100000000`, `10000000000`, `10**9`) across 22 files
as sentinel values for "parse all pages", making future maintenance
error-prone.
## Root Cause
```python
# deepdoc/parser/pdf_parser.py (before)
def __images__(self, fnm, zoomin=3, page_from=0, page_to=299, callback=None):
# Only the first 300 pages were rendered; everything beyond was silently dropped
```
While most callers in `rag/app/*.py` correctly passed `to_page=100000`,
the base class `RAGFlowPdfParser.__call__()` and `parse_into_bboxes()`
invoked `__images__` **without** forwarding `page_from`/`page_to`,
falling back to the restrictive default of 299.
## Solution
### 1. Define constants in `common/constants.py`
```python
MAXIMUM_PAGE_NUMBER = 100000 # Used by the parsing layer
MAXIMUM_TASK_PAGE_NUMBER = MAXIMUM_PAGE_NUMBER * 1000 # Used by the task/DB layer
```
### 2. Replace all hardcoded sentinel values
| Layer | Files Changed | Old Values | New Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| **Deepdoc parsers** | `pdf_parser.py`, `mineru_parser.py`,
`docling_parser.py`, `opendataloader_parser.py`, `paddleocr_parser.py`,
`docx_parser.py` | `299`, `600`, `10**9`, `100000000` |
`MAXIMUM_PAGE_NUMBER` |
| **Chunk parsers** | `naive.py`, `book.py`, `qa.py`, `one.py`,
`manual.py`, `paper.py`, `presentation.py`, `laws.py`, `resume.py`,
`email.py`, `table.py` | `100000`, `10000`, `10000000000` |
`MAXIMUM_PAGE_NUMBER` |
| **Task/DB layer** | `db_models.py`, `task_service.py`,
`document_service.py`, `file_service.py` | `100000000` |
`MAXIMUM_TASK_PAGE_NUMBER` |
### 3. Fix `parse_into_bboxes()` missing parameters
Added `from_page`/`to_page` parameters to `parse_into_bboxes()` so that
the `rag/flow/parser/parser.py` DeepDOC path no longer falls back to the
restrictive default.
## Files Changed (22)
- `common/constants.py`
- `deepdoc/parser/pdf_parser.py`
- `deepdoc/parser/mineru_parser.py`
- `deepdoc/parser/docling_parser.py`
- `deepdoc/parser/opendataloader_parser.py`
- `deepdoc/parser/paddleocr_parser.py`
- `deepdoc/parser/docx_parser.py`
- `rag/app/naive.py`
- `rag/app/book.py`
- `rag/app/qa.py`
- `rag/app/one.py`
- `rag/app/manual.py`
- `rag/app/paper.py`
- `rag/app/presentation.py`
- `rag/app/laws.py`
- `rag/app/resume.py`
- `rag/app/email.py`
- `rag/app/table.py`
- `api/db/db_models.py`
- `api/db/services/task_service.py`
- `api/db/services/document_service.py`
- `api/db/services/file_service.py`
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] Refactoring
---------
Signed-off-by: noob <yixiao121314@outlook.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
fix issue with stale tests on p3 level
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Implements automatic adjustment of knowledge base chunk recall weights
based on user feedback (upvotes/downvotes). When users upvote or
downvote a response, the system locates the corresponding knowledge
snippets and adjusts their recall weight to improve future retrieval
quality.
**Closes #12670**
**How it works:**
1. User upvotes/downvotes a response via `POST /thumbup`
2. System extracts chunk IDs from the conversation reference
3. For each referenced chunk:
- Reads current `pagerank_fea` value from document store
- Increments (+1) for upvote or decrements (-1) for downvote
- Clamps weight to [0, 100] range
- Updates chunk in ES/Infinity/OceanBase
4. Future retrievals score these chunks higher/lower based on
accumulated feedback
**Files changed:**
- `api/db/services/chunk_feedback_service.py` - New service for updating
chunk pagerank weights
- `api/apps/conversation_app.py` - Integrated feedback service into
thumbup endpoint
- `test/testcases/test_web_api/test_chunk_feedback/` - Unit tests
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **New Features**
* Chat message feedback now updates per-chunk relevance weights
(feature-flag gated), with configurable weighting and atomic updates
across storage backends.
* **Bug Fixes**
* Stricter validation for message feedback inputs and more robust
handling of feedback transitions.
* **Tests**
* Expanded test coverage for chunk-feedback behavior, weighting
strategies, storage backends, and thumb-flip scenarios.
* **Chores**
* CI workflow extended to run the new chunk-feedback web API tests.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: mkdev11 <YOUR_GITHUB_ID+MkDev11@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mkdev11 <MkDev11@users.noreply.github.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Empty ids means no-op operation.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] Documentation Update
- [x] Refactoring
---------
Co-authored-by: writinwaters <cai.keith@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Add id for table tenant_llm and apply in LLMBundle.
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
---------
Co-authored-by: Yingfeng <yingfeng.zhang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Liu An <asiro@qq.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Codecov’s coverage report shows that several RAGFlow code paths are
currently untested or under-tested. This makes it easier for regressions
to slip in during refactors and feature work.
This PR adds targeted automated tests to cover the files and branches
highlighted by Codecov, improving confidence in core behavior while
keeping runtime functionality unchanged.
### Type of change
- [x] Other (please describe): Test coverage improvement (adds/extends
unit and integration tests to address Codecov-reported gaps)
### What problem does this PR solve?
This PR makes the document change‑status endpoint idempotent under the
Infinity doc store. If a document already has the requested status, the
handler returns success without touching the engine, preventing
unnecessary updates and avoiding missing‑table errors while keeping
responses consistent.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
- Move common constants (HOST_ADDRESS, INVALID_API_TOKEN, etc.) to
configs.py
- Update test imports to use centralized configs
- Clean up duplicate constant definitions across test files
This improves maintainability by centralizing configuration.
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring test case
### What problem does this PR solve?
- Rename `api_key` fixture to `HttpApiAuth` across all test files
- Update all dependent fixtures and test cases to use new naming
- Maintain same functionality while improving naming clarity
The rename better reflects the fixture's purpose as an HTTP API
authentication helper rather than just an API key.
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
- Consolidate HTTP API test fixtures using batch operations
(batch_add_chunks, batch_create_chat_assistants)
- Fix fixture initialization order in clear_session_with_chat_assistants
- Add new SDK API test suite for session management
(create/delete/list/update)
### Type of change
- [x] Add test cases
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
- Implement new SDK API test cases for chat assistant CRUD operations
- Enhance HTTP API concurrent tests to use as_completed for better
reliability
### Type of change
- [x] Add test cases
- [x] Refactoring
