### What problem does this PR solve?
Closes#14618.
The `GET /v1/document/get/<doc_id>` endpoint in
`api/apps/document_app.py` was protected only by `@login_required` and
called `DocumentService.get_by_id(doc_id)` without verifying that the
document's knowledge base belonged to the requesting user's tenant. Any
authenticated user who knew (or guessed) a document ID could download
files belonging to any other tenant — a cross-tenant IDOR.
This PR adds a `DocumentService.accessible(doc_id, current_user.id)`
check before serving the file. The helper already exists and joins
`Document` → `Knowledgebase` → `UserTenant` to verify the requesting
user belongs to the tenant that owns the document's KB. The same pattern
is already used by `api/apps/restful_apis/document_api.py` and mirrors
the tenant scoping in the SDK route at `api/apps/sdk/doc.py`.
The check returns the existing `"Document not found!"` error for both
non-existent and inaccessible documents, so attackers cannot use the
response to enumerate valid doc IDs across tenants.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] Other (please describe): Security fix (cross-tenant IDOR /
authorization bypass)
### Related issues
Closes#14648
### What problem does this PR solve?
This PR fixes an authorization flaw in `POST /files/link-to-datasets`.
Before this change, the endpoint only checked whether the supplied
`file_ids` and `kb_ids` existed. It did not verify whether the
authenticated user was actually allowed to access those files or target
datasets. As a result, an authenticated user who knew valid IDs could
relink another user's files to arbitrary datasets.
This was especially risky because the relinking flow is state-changing:
the background worker removes existing file-document mappings and then
recreates documents under the attacker-supplied dataset IDs.
This change makes the route enforce the same permission model already
used by nearby file and document operations:
- each resolved file must pass `check_file_team_permission(...)`
- each target dataset must pass `check_kb_team_permission(...)`
- authorization is enforced before scheduling background relinking work
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Refactoring
- [ ] Performance Improvement
- [ ] Other (please describe):
### Testing
- Added regression coverage in
`test/testcases/test_web_api/test_file_app/test_file2document_routes_unit.py`
- Covered:
- unauthorized file access is rejected
- unauthorized dataset access is rejected
- existing success path still returns immediately after scheduling
background work
- Attempted to run:
- `python -m pytest
test\\testcases\\test_web_api\\test_file_app\\test_file2document_routes_unit.py
-q`
- Local execution in this workspace is currently blocked by missing test
dependencies during bootstrap, including `ragflow_sdk`
---------
Co-authored-by: jony376 <jony376@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Since secret key get and set logic is updated, the go server also need
to update.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
---------
Signed-off-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Follow on PR: https://github.com/infiniflow/ragflow/pull/14602
to fix: team member cannot edit agent.
new behavior: beside delete, everything is allowed for team member.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
A and B, two API servers and a REDIS server.
If A and REDIS restart, B will hold the obsolete secret key and will
lead to error.
TODO:
app.config['SECRET_KEY'] and app.secret_key still hold obsolete secret
key.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
---------
Signed-off-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
This PR addresses three related GraphRAG reliability issues that
together allow long-running GraphRAG tasks (10+ hours of LLM extraction)
to be resumed after a crash or pause without re-doing completed work. It
builds on #14096 (per-doc subgraph cache) and extends the same idea to
the resolution and community-detection phases.
Fixes#14236.
## 1. Fix concurrent merge crash
Long GraphRAG runs would crash near the end of entity resolution with:
```
RuntimeError: dictionary keys changed during iteration
```
in `Extractor._merge_graph_nodes`. Two changes:
- `rag/graphrag/general/extractor.py`: snapshot `graph.neighbors(node1)`
via `list(...)` before iterating, so concurrent `add_edge` /
`remove_node` mutations on the shared `nx.Graph` cannot invalidate the
iterator. Also tracks each redirected neighbour in `node0_neighbors` so
a later merged node sharing the same external neighbour takes the
edge-merge branch instead of overwriting via `add_edge`.
- `rag/graphrag/entity_resolution.py`: serialize the merge step with a
dedicated `asyncio.Semaphore(1)`. `nx.Graph` is not thread-safe and
concurrent merges on overlapping neighbourhoods can produce incorrect
results even with the snapshot fix.
## 2. Don't wipe partial graph on pause
Previously the pause / cancel UI path called
`settings.docStoreConn.delete({"knowledge_graph_kwd": [...]}, ...)`,
destroying every subgraph, entity, relation, and graph row.
Re-triggering then started GraphRAG from scratch even though #14096 had
already added `load_subgraph_from_store`.
After main was merged in (which deleted `api/apps/kb_app.py` per
#14394), the pause path now lives on the new REST surface `DELETE
/v1/datasets/<id>/<index_type>`:
- `api/apps/services/dataset_api_service.py`: `delete_index` accepts a
`wipe: bool = True` parameter. When `False` the doc-store rows and
GraphRAG phase markers are left intact and only the running task is
cancelled. Default preserves historical behaviour.
- `api/apps/restful_apis/dataset_api.py`: parses `?wipe=false|0|no|off`
from the query string and forwards it.
- `web/src/utils/api.ts` + `web/src/services/knowledge-service.ts`:
`unbindPipelineTask` appends `?wipe=false` when explicitly false.
- The GraphRAG pause action in
`web/src/pages/dataset/dataset/generate-button/hook.ts` passes `wipe:
false` for `KnowledgeGraph`; raptor is unchanged.
**UX impact:** the pause icon next to a running GraphRAG task no longer
wipes graph data. The only path that still wipes is the explicit Delete
action in `GenerateLogButton` (trash icon behind a confirmation modal).
## 3. Phase-completion markers (`rag/graphrag/phase_markers.py`)
A small Redis-backed marker layer at
`graphrag:phase:{kb_id}:{resolution_done|community_done}` (7-day TTL).
`run_graphrag_for_kb` consults the markers on entry and skips phases
that already completed in a prior run. Markers are cleared automatically
when:
- new docs are merged into the graph (which invalidates prior resolution
and community results),
- `delete_index` wipes the graph, or
- `delete_knowledge_graph` is called.
Redis failures never block a run -- markers are an optimization, not a
gate.
## 4. Idempotent community detection
`extract_community` previously did `delete-then-insert` on
`community_report` rows; a crash mid-insert left the dataset with no
reports. Now report IDs are derived deterministically from `(kb_id,
community.title)`, the existing report IDs are snapshotted before
insert, new rows are written, then only stale rows are pruned. A failure
at any step leaves either the prior or the new report set intact --
never a partial mix.
## 5. Tunable doc-store insert pipeline
The GraphRAG insert loop in `rag/graphrag/utils.py` and the
`community_report` insert in `rag/graphrag/general/index.py` were both
hardcoded to `es_bulk_size = 4` and ran strictly sequentially. On a real
KB this meant 1077 chunks took ~21 minutes for a 100-chunk slice -- pure
round-trip overhead.
- New `insert_chunks_bounded()` helper in `rag/graphrag/utils.py`
batches inserts via a bounded `asyncio.Semaphore`. Same retry / timeout
semantics as the prior loop.
- Defaults: 64 docs per batch, 4 batches in flight (matches the regular
ingest pipeline in `document_service.py`). Tunable per-deployment via
`GRAPHRAG_INSERT_BULK_SIZE` and `GRAPHRAG_INSERT_CONCURRENCY`.
- Both `set_graph` and `extract_community` now use the helper.
This dropped the same 1077-chunk insert from minutes to seconds in local
testing without measurable extra pressure on Infinity (total in-flight
docs ≤ `BULK_SIZE × CONCURRENCY` = 256 by default).
## Tests
- `test/unit_test/rag/graphrag/test_merge_graph_nodes.py` (3 tests):
dense neighbourhood merge, neighbour-snapshot regression, concurrent
serialized merges.
- `test/unit_test/rag/graphrag/test_phase_markers.py` (4 tests): set/has
round-trip, kb-scoped clear, no-op on empty input, graceful Redis
failure.
-
`test/testcases/test_web_api/test_dataset_management/test_dataset_sdk_routes_unit.py`:
new `test_delete_index_wipe_flag_unit` covers `wipe=false` for both
GraphRAG and raptor on the new REST route, and confirms the default
still wipes and clears phase markers.
## Compatibility
- Backward compatible: tasks queued before this change behave
identically (default `wipe=true`, no markers expected).
- No schema/migration changes; all new state lives in Redis.
- New optional REST query param `wipe` on `DELETE
/v1/datasets/<id>/<index_type>`.
- New optional env vars `GRAPHRAG_INSERT_BULK_SIZE` and
`GRAPHRAG_INSERT_CONCURRENCY`; defaults preserve safe behaviour.
## Example of resume
Screenshot below shows a test resuming knowledge graph generation after
applying the concurrency fix and re-deploying.
<img width="521" height="677" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9ef0d405-cbb3-420d-a1a1-e51f3e7e9b7a"
/>
### Type of change
- [X] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Refactoring
- [ ] Performance Improvement
- [ ] Other (please describe):
### What problem does this PR solve?
remove delete_documents uuid validation
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
## Summary
Migrate two web API endpoints to REST-style HTTP API endpoints,
following the pattern established in #14222:
| Old Endpoint | New Endpoint |
|---|---|
| `POST /v1/chunk/retrieval_test` | `POST
/api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/search` |
| `GET /v1/chunk/knowledge_graph` | `GET
/api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/graph` |
### What problem does this PR solve?
Fix: google authentication - gmail && google-drive
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before migration
Web API: POST /v1/document/change_parser
HTTP API: PATCH /api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
After consolidation, Restful API
PATCH /api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before migration: GET /v1/document/thumbnails
After migration: GET /api/v1/thumbnails
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before migration: POST /v1/document/run
After migration: POST /api/v1/documents/ingest/
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before migration
Web API: POST /v1/document/change_status
After consolidation, Restful API
POST /api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents/batch-update-status
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before migration: POST /v1/document/upload_info/
After migration: POST /api/v1/documentss/upload/
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
The POST /upload_info?url=<url> endpoint accepted a user-supplied URL
and passed it directly to AsyncWebCrawler without any validation. There
were no restrictions on URL scheme, destination hostname, or resolved IP
address. This allowed any authenticated user to instruct the server to
make outbound HTTP requests to internal infrastructure — including RFC
1918 private networks, loopback addresses, and cloud metadata services
such as http://169.254.169.254 — effectively using the server as a proxy
for internal network reconnaissance or credential theft.
This PR adds an SSRF guard (_validate_url_for_crawl) that runs before
any crawl is initiated. It enforces an allowlist of safe schemes
(http/https), resolves the hostname at validation time, and rejects any
URL whose resolved IP falls within a private or reserved network range.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before migration
Web API: POST /v1/document/metadata/update
After migration, Restful API
PATCH /api/v2/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents/metadatas
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before migration
Web API: POST /v1/document/update_metadata_setting
After consolidation, Restful API
PUT
/api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents/<document_id>/metadata/config
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before consolidation
Web API: POST /v1/document/rm
Http API - DELETE /api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
After consolidation, Restful API -- DELETE
/api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Refactor /api/v1/chats to be more RESTful.
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
---------
Co-authored-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before consolidation
Web API: POST /v1/document/infos
Http API - GET /api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
After consolidation, Restful API -- GET
/api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents?ids=id1&ids=id2
### Type of change
- [ ] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before consolidation
Web API: POST /v1/document/filter
Http API - GET /api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
After consolidation, Restful API -- GET
/api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents?type=filter
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before consolidation
Web API: POST /v1/document/list
Http API - GET /api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
After consolidation, Restful API -- GET
/api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
Closes#9078
### What problem does this PR solve?
The `retrieval_test` endpoint in `chunk_app.py` never forwarded the
`highlight` request parameter to `retriever.retrieval()`, so the search
engine never produced highlight snippets. Additionally, the frontend
always rendered `content_with_weight` instead of preferring the
`highlight` field, and the CSS rule color `var(--accent-primary)` didn't
work because the variable stores an RGB triplet `(45,212,191)` requiring
the `rgb()` wrapper.
### Before
- Search page: displayed raw content_with_weight as a wall of plain
white text with no term highlighting, including markdown headings
rendered as literal text
- Retrieval testing page: showed `content_with_weight` in a plain `<p>`
tag, no `<em>` tags rendered, no highlight coloring
- Children chunks: when child chunks were consolidated into a parent via
`retrieval_by_children`, any highlight data from children was discarded
- TOC chunks: chunks fetched via `retrieval_by_toc` had no `highlight`
field, appearing as plain text while other chunks had highlights
**Retrieval testing**:
<img width="1449" height="1178"
alt="before-retrieval-no-highlight-cropped"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5c6f5a5e-6c11-461a-bdb4-049d7dfb7a33"
/>
**Search**:
<img width="1378" height="711" alt="before-search-no-highlight-cropped"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/be7b5152-72ef-40da-a8fd-921e997ae7d3"
/>
### After
- Search page: displays the highlight field with search terms rendered
in teal/cyan color (`rgb(var(--accent-primary))`)
- Retrieval testing page: sends highlight: true in the request, uses
`HighLightMarkdown` component to render `<em>` tags with proper coloring
- Children chunks: highlights from child chunks are joined and preserved
on the parent
- TOC chunks: when other chunks have highlights, TOC-fetched chunks use
`content_with_weight` as a highlight fallback
**Retrieval testing**:
<img width="1410" height="1015" alt="05-retrieval-testing-results"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f0cff8cf-0962-4320-b559-cd5037f622d2"
/>
**Search**:
<img width="1294" height="455" alt="03-search-highlight-results"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a90e0e3e-3837-46be-8ddd-2412ff7cbc19"
/>
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
Closes#6541
### What problem does this PR solve?
Add content validation to `update_chunk` (SDK and non-SDK) to reject
empty or whitespace-only content before it reaches the embedding model.
**Before:** Calling `update_chunk` with space-only content (like `" "`,
`""`, `"\n"`) bypassed validation and was sent directly to the embedding
model, which returned an error. This was the same bug previously fixed
for `add_chunk` in #6390, but `update_chunk` was missed.
**After:** Empty/whitespace-only content is caught by validation and
returns an error: `` `content` is required ``
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Summary
- remove eval-based parsing from retrieval rank feature scoring
- validate `tag_feas` at write time in chunk APIs and SDK routes
- add regression tests for safe parsing and malicious payload rejection
## Details
`tag_feas` is intended to be structured rank-feature data, but the
retrieval ranking path was evaluating stored values as Python
expressions. This change treats `tag_feas` strictly as data.
### What changed
- replace `eval()` in `rag/nlp/search.py` with safe parsing via
`json.loads()` and optional `ast.literal_eval()` compatibility for
legacy Python-dict strings
- strictly filter parsed values down to `dict[str, finite number]`
- reject invalid `tag_feas` payloads at write time in web chunk routes
and SDK document chunk routes
- add focused regression tests to prove executable strings are ignored
and invalid payloads are rejected
## Validation
- `python -m pytest test/unit_test/common/test_tag_feature_utils.py
test/unit_test/rag/test_rank_feature_scores.py -q`
---------
Co-authored-by: unknown <zhenglinkai@CCN.Local>
Co-authored-by: Yingfeng Zhang <yingfeng.zhang@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Consolidation WEB API & HTTP API for document upload
Before consolidation
Web API: POST /v1/document/upload
Http API - POST /api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
After consolidation, Restful API -- POST
/api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
