### What problem does this PR solve?
fix some comments to improve readability
### Type of change
- [x] Documentation Update
---------
Signed-off-by: box4wangjing <box4wangjing@outlook.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Addresses event-loop blocking under high concurrency reported in #13825.
When multiple requests hit the API simultaneously, synchronous DB/Redis
calls block the async event loop, preventing Quart from handling other
requests and causing cascading 502/504 timeouts.
This PR wraps all remaining blocking DB/Redis calls in `canvas_app.py`,
`chat_api.py`, `session.py`, and `canvas_service.py` with `await
thread_pool_exec()`
- Offload all synchronous `Service.*`, `REDIS_CONN.*`, and
`APIToken.query` calls to the thread pool
- Convert sync endpoint handlers (`list_chats`, `get_chat`, `templates`,
`sessions`, etc.) to `async def`
- Convert sync helper functions (`_ensure_owned_chat`,
`_validate_llm_id`, `_validate_dataset_ids`, etc.) to async - no
duplicate sync/async pairs
- Wrap `CanvasReplicaService` Redis IO calls (`bootstrap`,
`replace_for_set`, `commit_after_run`)
- Use `asyncio.gather()` for concurrent file uploads and chat response
building
**Note:** This fixes the code-level event-loop blocking, which is a
prerequisite for handling concurrent requests. For the full "30
concurrent requests without 502/504" goal described in the issue, users
should also tune deployment config:
- `WS=4` or higher (HTTP worker processes, default 1)
- `MAX_CONCURRENT_CHATS=50` (default 10)
- `SANDBOX_EXECUTOR_MANAGER_POOL_SIZE` for workflow-heavy workloads
### Performance verification
Reviewer asked for a before-vs-after comparison
([comment](https://github.com/infiniflow/ragflow/pull/13941#issuecomment-4393667231)).
I built a self-contained microbenchmark that reproduces the exact
failure mode this PR targets: an async handler that performs blocking
DB/Redis-style calls (50 ms each, 3 per request, 30 concurrent requests)
is run twice — once with the pre-PR pattern (sync call directly inside
the async handler) and once with the post-PR pattern (`await
thread_pool_exec(...)`). The benchmark imports nothing from RAGFlow
except `thread_pool_exec` itself, so it is hermetic and reproducible
(`THREAD_POOL_MAX_WORKERS=128`, Python 3.13.12).
**Throughput — wall-clock for 30 concurrent requests (lower is better)**
| flavour | wall(s) | p50(s) | p95(s) | max(s) |
|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|
| before | 4.986 | 0.158 | 0.207 | 0.269 |
| after | 0.248 | 0.181 | 0.230 | 0.231 |
The pre-PR handler serializes the entire load on the event-loop thread,
so 30 × 3 × 50 ms ≈ 4.5 s shows up as the wall time. The post-PR handler
parallelizes the blocking work across the thread pool and finishes the
same load in 248 ms — a **~20× speedup** on this workload.
**Event-loop responsiveness — latency of an unrelated probe coroutine
while the 30 slow requests are running (lower is better)**
| flavour | samples | probe p50 (ms) | probe p95 (ms) | probe max (ms) |
|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|
| before | 1 | 5442.26 | 5442.26 | 5442.26 |
| after | 28 | 0.88 | 11.53 | 98.02 |
This is the metric that maps directly to "the API still answers other
requests while one is busy". A 5 ms-interval probe was scheduled while
the 30 slow handlers ran. With the pre-PR code the event loop was frozen
for the entire duration of the blocking work, so only one probe sample
was ever picked up and it waited **5,442 ms**. After the PR, 28 probe
samples landed with **p50 0.88 ms / p95 11.53 ms**, meaning unrelated
requests are no longer starved by the slow ones. That is the regression
mode behind the cascading 502/504s reported in #13825.
<details>
<summary>Raw benchmark output</summary>
```
config: 30 concurrent requests, 3 blocking calls of 50ms each per request, THREAD_POOL_MAX_WORKERS=128
=== Throughput (lower wall is better) ===
flavour wall(s) p50(s) p95(s) max(s)
before 4.986 0.158 0.207 0.269
after 0.248 0.181 0.230 0.231
=== Event-loop responsiveness (lower probe latency is better) ===
flavour samples probe p50(ms) probe p95(ms) probe max(ms)
before 1 5442.26 5442.26 5442.26
after 28 0.88 11.53 98.02
```
</details>
The benchmark script is included as a comment on the PR for
reproducibility.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] Performance Improvement
Closes [#13825](https://github.com/infiniflow/ragflow/issues/13825)
---------
Co-authored-by: tmimmanuel <tmimmanuel@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kevin Hu <kevinhu.sh@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
- Moved if not all([email, new_pwd, new_pwd2]) guard to the top, before
any decryption that could crash on None value
- Removed the redundant REDIS_CONN.get() call — one call is sufficient
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] Refactoring
### Related issues
Closes#14744
### What problem does this PR solve?
The Memory REST endpoint `POST /api/v1/messages` previously persisted
whatever `user_id` the client sent in the JSON body. Memory rows were
therefore attributed to an arbitrary string, even when the caller
authenticated as a normal workspace user via JWT (browser/session-style
bearer token decoded into an access token). That broke attribution and
audit semantics for shared memories (team visibility): any authorized
writer could spoof another subject id.
The Python SDK already sends an optional `user_id` for integrations
using **API keys** (`APIToken`) to tag an external subject distinct from
the tenant owner user.
### Solution
- Record **`g.auth_via_api_token`** in `_load_user`
(`api/apps/__init__.py`): set `True` only when authentication resolves
via `APIToken`, otherwise `False` after JWT-based login succeeds.
- In **`POST /messages`** (`memory_api.add_message`): if the request was
authenticated with an API key, keep accepting optional `user_id` from
the body (default empty string). For JWT-authenticated users, **always**
set stored `user_id` to **`current_user.id`** and ignore the client
field.
- Guard reads of `g` with **`RuntimeError`** handling so isolated
imports or tests without a Quart application context do not fail when
resolving `user_id`.
- Document on **`RAGFlow.add_message`** that `user_id` is only
meaningful for API-key authentication.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Refactoring
- [ ] Performance Improvement
- [ ] Other (please describe):
### Testing
- `python -m py_compile` on modified modules (`api/apps/__init__.py`,
`api/apps/restful_apis/memory_api.py`).
- Recommended: run web/SDK memory message tests (`test_add_message`,
`test_message_routes_unit`) against a full environment with `quart` and
configured services.
### Notes for reviewers
- Behavior change **only** for callers using JWT-style authorization on
`POST /messages`; API-key callers keep prior optional `user_id`
semantics.
Co-authored-by: jony376 <jony376@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
## Problem
During the REST API refactoring (#13690), the
`/api/v2/kb/check_embedding` endpoint was removed and never migrated to
the new RESTful structure. The frontend was pointed to the
`/api/v1/datasets/{id}/embedding` endpoint (which is `run_embedding` — a
completely different function). Additionally, a hard guard was
introduced that rejects any `embd_id` change when `chunk_num > 0`,
making it impossible to switch embedding models on datasets with
existing chunks.
## Root Cause
1. **Missing endpoint**: The old `check_embedding` logic (sample random
chunks, re-embed with the new model, compare cosine similarity) was not
carried over to the new REST API service layer.
2. **Wrong frontend URL**: `checkEmbedding` in `api.ts` pointed to
`/datasets/{id}/embedding` (`run_embedding`) instead of a dedicated
check endpoint.
3. **Overly restrictive guard**: `dataset_api_service.py` line 310
blocked all `embd_id` updates when `chunk_num > 0`. This check did not
exist in the pre-refactor code — it was incorrectly introduced during
the refactor.
## Changes
### Backend
- **`api/apps/services/dataset_api_service.py`**
- Remove the `chunk_num > 0` hard guard on `embd_id` updates
- Add `check_embedding()` service function: samples random chunks,
re-embeds them with the candidate model, computes cosine similarity,
returns compatibility result (avg ≥ 0.9 = compatible)
- Add `import re` for the `_clean()` helper
- **`api/apps/restful_apis/dataset_api.py`**
- Add `POST /datasets/<dataset_id>/embedding/check` endpoint following
the new REST API conventions
- Clean up unused top-level imports (`random`, `re`, `numpy`)
### Frontend
- **`web/src/utils/api.ts`**
- Fix `checkEmbedding` URL from `/datasets/${datasetId}/embedding` →
`/datasets/${datasetId}/embedding/check`
### Tests
-
**`test/testcases/test_http_api/test_dataset_management/test_update_dataset.py`**
- Update `test_embedding_model_with_existing_chunks` to assert success
(`code == 0`) instead of expecting the old `102` error
-
**`test/testcases/test_web_api/test_dataset_management/test_dataset_sdk_routes_unit.py`**
- Update `test_update_route_branch_matrix_unit` to assert
`RetCode.SUCCESS` when updating `embd_id` on a chunked dataset,
replacing the old `chunk_num` error assertion
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
---------
Signed-off-by: noob <yixiao121314@outlook.com>
Close#14292
## Issue
File ancestry endpoints return folder metadata without validating tenant
permissions, allowing any authenticated user to query arbitrary
`file_id` values across tenant boundaries.
## Affected Endpoints
- `GET /v1/file/parent_folder?file_id={file_id}`
- `GET /v1/file/all_parent_folder?file_id={file_id}`
- `GET /api/v1/files/{id}/ancestors`
## Root Cause
These endpoints **skip the permission check** that other file operations
(Delete, Download, Move) perform.
## Expected Permission Check
All file operations should follow this 3-step validation:
- Check file.tenant_id
- Check if user_id belongs to this tenant (via user_tenant join table)
- Check KB permission type (team permission)
**Code reference:** This is implemented in `checkFileTeamPermission()`
and used by Delete/Download/Move, but **missing** from
GetParentFolder/GetAllParentFolders.
## Reproduction
```bash
# User B (tenant: BBB) accessing User A's file (tenant: AAA)
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer USER_B_TOKEN" \
"http://localhost:9384/v1/file/parent_folder?file_id=AAA_FILE_123"
# Result: Returns User A's folder metadata ❌
# Expected: "No authorization." ✅
Fix
Pass userID from handler to service and call checkFileTeamPermission() — same as Download/Delete/Move handlers.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Refactor : Allow search multiple datasets
1. support /datasets/search
2. get rid of /graph/search, use /graph
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Closes#14618.
The `GET /v1/document/get/<doc_id>` endpoint in
`api/apps/document_app.py` was protected only by `@login_required` and
called `DocumentService.get_by_id(doc_id)` without verifying that the
document's knowledge base belonged to the requesting user's tenant. Any
authenticated user who knew (or guessed) a document ID could download
files belonging to any other tenant — a cross-tenant IDOR.
This PR adds a `DocumentService.accessible(doc_id, current_user.id)`
check before serving the file. The helper already exists and joins
`Document` → `Knowledgebase` → `UserTenant` to verify the requesting
user belongs to the tenant that owns the document's KB. The same pattern
is already used by `api/apps/restful_apis/document_api.py` and mirrors
the tenant scoping in the SDK route at `api/apps/sdk/doc.py`.
The check returns the existing `"Document not found!"` error for both
non-existent and inaccessible documents, so attackers cannot use the
response to enumerate valid doc IDs across tenants.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] Other (please describe): Security fix (cross-tenant IDOR /
authorization bypass)
### Related issues
Closes#14648
### What problem does this PR solve?
This PR fixes an authorization flaw in `POST /files/link-to-datasets`.
Before this change, the endpoint only checked whether the supplied
`file_ids` and `kb_ids` existed. It did not verify whether the
authenticated user was actually allowed to access those files or target
datasets. As a result, an authenticated user who knew valid IDs could
relink another user's files to arbitrary datasets.
This was especially risky because the relinking flow is state-changing:
the background worker removes existing file-document mappings and then
recreates documents under the attacker-supplied dataset IDs.
This change makes the route enforce the same permission model already
used by nearby file and document operations:
- each resolved file must pass `check_file_team_permission(...)`
- each target dataset must pass `check_kb_team_permission(...)`
- authorization is enforced before scheduling background relinking work
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Refactoring
- [ ] Performance Improvement
- [ ] Other (please describe):
### Testing
- Added regression coverage in
`test/testcases/test_web_api/test_file_app/test_file2document_routes_unit.py`
- Covered:
- unauthorized file access is rejected
- unauthorized dataset access is rejected
- existing success path still returns immediately after scheduling
background work
- Attempted to run:
- `python -m pytest
test\\testcases\\test_web_api\\test_file_app\\test_file2document_routes_unit.py
-q`
- Local execution in this workspace is currently blocked by missing test
dependencies during bootstrap, including `ragflow_sdk`
---------
Co-authored-by: jony376 <jony376@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Since secret key get and set logic is updated, the go server also need
to update.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
---------
Signed-off-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Follow on PR: https://github.com/infiniflow/ragflow/pull/14602
to fix: team member cannot edit agent.
new behavior: beside delete, everything is allowed for team member.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
support non-stream runtime agent completion
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
This PR addresses three related GraphRAG reliability issues that
together allow long-running GraphRAG tasks (10+ hours of LLM extraction)
to be resumed after a crash or pause without re-doing completed work. It
builds on #14096 (per-doc subgraph cache) and extends the same idea to
the resolution and community-detection phases.
Fixes#14236.
## 1. Fix concurrent merge crash
Long GraphRAG runs would crash near the end of entity resolution with:
```
RuntimeError: dictionary keys changed during iteration
```
in `Extractor._merge_graph_nodes`. Two changes:
- `rag/graphrag/general/extractor.py`: snapshot `graph.neighbors(node1)`
via `list(...)` before iterating, so concurrent `add_edge` /
`remove_node` mutations on the shared `nx.Graph` cannot invalidate the
iterator. Also tracks each redirected neighbour in `node0_neighbors` so
a later merged node sharing the same external neighbour takes the
edge-merge branch instead of overwriting via `add_edge`.
- `rag/graphrag/entity_resolution.py`: serialize the merge step with a
dedicated `asyncio.Semaphore(1)`. `nx.Graph` is not thread-safe and
concurrent merges on overlapping neighbourhoods can produce incorrect
results even with the snapshot fix.
## 2. Don't wipe partial graph on pause
Previously the pause / cancel UI path called
`settings.docStoreConn.delete({"knowledge_graph_kwd": [...]}, ...)`,
destroying every subgraph, entity, relation, and graph row.
Re-triggering then started GraphRAG from scratch even though #14096 had
already added `load_subgraph_from_store`.
After main was merged in (which deleted `api/apps/kb_app.py` per
#14394), the pause path now lives on the new REST surface `DELETE
/v1/datasets/<id>/<index_type>`:
- `api/apps/services/dataset_api_service.py`: `delete_index` accepts a
`wipe: bool = True` parameter. When `False` the doc-store rows and
GraphRAG phase markers are left intact and only the running task is
cancelled. Default preserves historical behaviour.
- `api/apps/restful_apis/dataset_api.py`: parses `?wipe=false|0|no|off`
from the query string and forwards it.
- `web/src/utils/api.ts` + `web/src/services/knowledge-service.ts`:
`unbindPipelineTask` appends `?wipe=false` when explicitly false.
- The GraphRAG pause action in
`web/src/pages/dataset/dataset/generate-button/hook.ts` passes `wipe:
false` for `KnowledgeGraph`; raptor is unchanged.
**UX impact:** the pause icon next to a running GraphRAG task no longer
wipes graph data. The only path that still wipes is the explicit Delete
action in `GenerateLogButton` (trash icon behind a confirmation modal).
## 3. Phase-completion markers (`rag/graphrag/phase_markers.py`)
A small Redis-backed marker layer at
`graphrag:phase:{kb_id}:{resolution_done|community_done}` (7-day TTL).
`run_graphrag_for_kb` consults the markers on entry and skips phases
that already completed in a prior run. Markers are cleared automatically
when:
- new docs are merged into the graph (which invalidates prior resolution
and community results),
- `delete_index` wipes the graph, or
- `delete_knowledge_graph` is called.
Redis failures never block a run -- markers are an optimization, not a
gate.
## 4. Idempotent community detection
`extract_community` previously did `delete-then-insert` on
`community_report` rows; a crash mid-insert left the dataset with no
reports. Now report IDs are derived deterministically from `(kb_id,
community.title)`, the existing report IDs are snapshotted before
insert, new rows are written, then only stale rows are pruned. A failure
at any step leaves either the prior or the new report set intact --
never a partial mix.
## 5. Tunable doc-store insert pipeline
The GraphRAG insert loop in `rag/graphrag/utils.py` and the
`community_report` insert in `rag/graphrag/general/index.py` were both
hardcoded to `es_bulk_size = 4` and ran strictly sequentially. On a real
KB this meant 1077 chunks took ~21 minutes for a 100-chunk slice -- pure
round-trip overhead.
- New `insert_chunks_bounded()` helper in `rag/graphrag/utils.py`
batches inserts via a bounded `asyncio.Semaphore`. Same retry / timeout
semantics as the prior loop.
- Defaults: 64 docs per batch, 4 batches in flight (matches the regular
ingest pipeline in `document_service.py`). Tunable per-deployment via
`GRAPHRAG_INSERT_BULK_SIZE` and `GRAPHRAG_INSERT_CONCURRENCY`.
- Both `set_graph` and `extract_community` now use the helper.
This dropped the same 1077-chunk insert from minutes to seconds in local
testing without measurable extra pressure on Infinity (total in-flight
docs ≤ `BULK_SIZE × CONCURRENCY` = 256 by default).
## Tests
- `test/unit_test/rag/graphrag/test_merge_graph_nodes.py` (3 tests):
dense neighbourhood merge, neighbour-snapshot regression, concurrent
serialized merges.
- `test/unit_test/rag/graphrag/test_phase_markers.py` (4 tests): set/has
round-trip, kb-scoped clear, no-op on empty input, graceful Redis
failure.
-
`test/testcases/test_web_api/test_dataset_management/test_dataset_sdk_routes_unit.py`:
new `test_delete_index_wipe_flag_unit` covers `wipe=false` for both
GraphRAG and raptor on the new REST route, and confirms the default
still wipes and clears phase markers.
## Compatibility
- Backward compatible: tasks queued before this change behave
identically (default `wipe=true`, no markers expected).
- No schema/migration changes; all new state lives in Redis.
- New optional REST query param `wipe` on `DELETE
/v1/datasets/<id>/<index_type>`.
- New optional env vars `GRAPHRAG_INSERT_BULK_SIZE` and
`GRAPHRAG_INSERT_CONCURRENCY`; defaults preserve safe behaviour.
## Example of resume
Screenshot below shows a test resuming knowledge graph generation after
applying the concurrency fix and re-deploying.
<img width="521" height="677" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9ef0d405-cbb3-420d-a1a1-e51f3e7e9b7a"
/>
### Type of change
- [X] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Refactoring
- [ ] Performance Improvement
- [ ] Other (please describe):
### What problem does this PR solve?
add legacy agent completion API compatibility
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
This PR fixes missing authorization checks in the Memory API.
Previously, several authenticated endpoints accepted caller-supplied
`tenant_id`, `owner_ids`, or `memory_id` values and used them directly
to list, read, update, delete, or search Memory data.
That could allow an authenticated user to access or mutate another
tenant's Memory records if they knew a tenant ID or memory ID. The fix
centralizes Memory access checks and applies them consistently across
Memory and Memory-message operations.
The change:
- Adds helper logic to parse list filters and compute tenant IDs
accessible to `current_user`.
- Requires direct `memory_id` operations to pass Memory access checks
before reading, updating, deleting, or changing message state.
- Filters list/search/recent-message requests to accessible memories
only.
- Applies Memory visibility filtering before count and pagination in
`MemoryService.get_by_filter`.
- Accepts `owner_ids` in the Memory list route, matching the frontend
owner filter while still intersecting values with the caller's
accessible tenants.
-
### Related issues
Closes#14534
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
Co-authored-by: jony376 <jony376@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Currently, RAGFlow's Search and Chat interfaces display only raw
vectorized text chunks during retrieval, without contextual information
about their source documents. Users cannot see document titles, page
numbers, upload dates, or custom metadata fields that would help them
understand and trust the retrieved results.
This PR introduces an **optional metadata display feature** that
enriches retrieved chunks with document-level metadata in both the
Search tab and Chatbot interface.
**Key improvements:**
- **Search results**: Display document metadata as styled badges beneath
chunk snippets
- **Chat citations**: Show metadata in citation popovers and reference
lists for better source context
- **LLM context**: Metadata is injected into the LLM prompt to enable
more accurate, citation-aware responses
- **External API support**: Applications using RAGFlow's SDK retrieval
endpoints (`/v1/retrieval`, `/v1/searchbots/retrieval_test`) can opt-in
via request parameters
- **User control**: Multi-select dropdown UI allows users to choose
which metadata fields to display
**Implementation approach:**
- ✅ Reuses existing `DocMetadataService` infrastructure (no new database
tables or indices)
- ✅ Settings stored in existing JSON configuration fields
(`search_config.reference_metadata`, `prompt_config.reference_metadata`)
- ✅ No database migrations required
- ✅ Disabled by default (fully opt-in and backward-compatible)
- ✅ Dynamic metadata field selection populated from actual document
metadata keys
- ✅ Fixed critical bug where Python's builtin `set()` was shadowed by a
route handler function
**Modified endpoints (all backward-compatible):**
- `POST /v1/retrieval` (Public SDK)
- `POST /v1/searchbots/retrieval_test` (Searchbots)
- `POST /v1/chunk/retrieval_test` (UI/Internal)
- Chat completions endpoints (via `extra_body.reference_metadata` or
`prompt_config`)
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
###Images
-
<img width="879" height="1275" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/95b2d731-31ae-45a1-b081-bf5893f52aeb"
/>
<br><br>
<br><br>
<img width="1532" height="362" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9cebc65b-b7a7-459f-b25e-3b13fa9b638e"
/>
<br><br>
<br><br>
<img width="2586" height="1320" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2153d493-d899-461f-a7a9-041391e07776"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Attili-sys <Attili-sys@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ahmad Intisar <ahmadintisar@Ahmads-MacBook-M4-Pro.local>
### What problem does this PR solve?
## Summary
Fixed a bug where the **File Logs** tab in the dataset ingestion page
always showed "No logs" even after files were parsed successfully.
## Root Cause
Both the **File Logs** and **Dataset Logs** tabs on the frontend called
the same backend endpoint `/datasets/{dataset_id}/ingestions`. However,
the backend only queried `get_dataset_logs_by_kb_id`, which
hard-filtered records by `document_id == GRAPH_RAPTOR_FAKE_DOC_ID`
(dataset-level logs). As a result, real file-level logs were never
returned, causing the table to appear empty.
## Changes
### Backend
- **`api/apps/restful_apis/dataset_api.py`**
- Added two new query parameters to `list_ingestion_logs`:
- `log_type` — `"file"` or `"dataset"` (default: `"dataset"`)
- `keywords` — search keyword for filtering by document / task name
- **`api/apps/services/dataset_api_service.py`**
- Updated `list_ingestion_logs` signature to accept `log_type` and
`keywords`.
- Added conditional routing:
- When `log_type == "file"`, call
`PipelineOperationLogService.get_file_logs_by_kb_id`
- Otherwise, call
`PipelineOperationLogService.get_dataset_logs_by_kb_id`
- **`api/db/services/pipeline_operation_log_service.py`**
- Extended `get_dataset_logs_by_kb_id` with an optional `keywords`
parameter so dataset logs can also be searched.
### Frontend
- **`web/src/pages/dataset/dataset-overview/hook.ts`**
- Removed the separate API function switching (`listPipelineDatasetLogs`
vs `listDataPipelineLogDocument`).
- Unified both tabs to call `listDataPipelineLogDocument` with the new
`log_type` query parameter (`"file"` or `"dataset"`).
- Ensured `keywords` and filter values are passed through correctly.
## Behavior After Fix
| Tab | `log_type` | Returned Records | Searchable Field |
|---|---|---|---|
| File Logs | `file` | Real document-level logs | `document_name` (file
name) |
| Dataset Logs | `dataset` | GraphRAG / RAPTOR / MindMap logs |
`document_name` (task type) |
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
---------
Signed-off-by: noob <yixiao121314@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Wang Qi <wangq8@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Yingfeng Zhang <yingfeng.zhang@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
## Summary
Migrate two web API endpoints to REST-style HTTP API endpoints,
following the pattern established in #14222:
| Old Endpoint | New Endpoint |
|---|---|
| `POST /v1/chunk/retrieval_test` | `POST
/api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/search` |
| `GET /v1/chunk/knowledge_graph` | `GET
/api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/graph` |
### What problem does this PR solve?
Fix: google authentication - gmail && google-drive
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Always return success if no such task id to follow existing code logic.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before migration
Web API: POST /v1/document/change_parser
HTTP API: PATCH /api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
After consolidation, Restful API
PATCH /api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before migration: GET /v1/document/thumbnails
After migration: GET /api/v1/thumbnails
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before migration: POST /v1/document/run
After migration: POST /api/v1/documents/ingest/
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before migration
Web API: POST /v1/document/change_status
After consolidation, Restful API
POST /api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents/batch-update-status
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before migration: POST /v1/document/upload_info/
After migration: POST /api/v1/documentss/upload/
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before migration: GET /v1/document/artifact/<filename>
After migration: GET /api/v1/documents/artifact/<filename>
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
