### What problem does this PR solve?
Part of #15240 (rewriting the RAGFlow API server in Go).
Implements the two public bot endpoints from
`api/apps/restful_apis/bot_api.py`:
- **`GET /api/v1/chatbots/<dialog_id>/info`** (`chatbots_inputs`) —
returns `{title, avatar, prologue, has_tavily_key}` for a dialog the
authenticated tenant owns (tenant match + `status == VALID`), otherwise
`"Authentication error: no access to this chatbot!"`.
- **`GET /api/v1/searchbots/detail`** (`detail_share_embedded`) —
returns search-app detail for a `search_id` the tenant can access.
Permission is checked across the tenant's joined tenants; denial returns
`"Has no permission for this operation."` (operating error, `data:
false`) and a missing app returns `"Can't find this Search App!"`.
Both endpoints authenticate with an SDK **beta token** (`Authorization:
Bearer <beta>`) rather than a session — the token is resolved to a
tenant via `APIToken.query(beta=token)`, backed by a new
`APITokenDAO.GetByBeta`. Because they perform their own token-based
auth, the routes are registered on the unauthenticated route group
(mirroring the Python blueprint, which has no `@login_required`).
Both live in a new `internal/handler/bot.go` + `internal/service/bot.go`
since they share the same source module. Handler unit tests cover the
auth, success, and error-mapping paths.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Code <claude@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Ling Qin <qinling0210@163.com>
## Summary
- add public Go route for `/api/v1/searchbots/detail`
- implement beta-token auth flow for shared search access
- add tenant-based access check for shared search apps
- add joined search detail query for the share response
- align Go response shape with the current Python runtime behavior
- add DAO / service / handler tests for the new endpoint
### What problem does this PR solve?
Merge password related functions
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
Signed-off-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Fix register user
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
---------
Signed-off-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
## Summary
Implements **chunk 1** of #15282 — the four `/api/v1/auth/password/...`
endpoints from the login-page Go port. **Chunk 2 (OAuth/OIDC) is
deferred** to its own subtask, matching the issue author's own
confidence-low recommendation ("multi-provider, stateful redirect flow
with external dependencies; recommend its own subtask").
New endpoints, all registered under `apiNoAuth` (forgot-password users
are unauthenticated by definition):
| Method | Path | Status |
|--------|------|--------|
| `POST` | `/api/v1/auth/password/forgot/captcha` | new |
| `POST` | `/api/v1/auth/password/forgot/otp` | new |
| `POST` | `/api/v1/auth/password/forgot/otp/verify` | new |
| `POST` | `/api/v1/auth/password/reset` | new |
## Wire compatibility with the Python backend
The two backends share state through Redis, so the Go port had to use
identical keys, encodings, and constants. Either backend can now
validate a code the other minted.
- **Redis keys**: `captcha:<email>`, `otp:<email>`,
`otp_attempts:<email>`, `otp_last_sent:<email>`, `otp_lock:<email>`,
`otp:verified:<email>` — same as `api/utils/web_utils.py`.
- **Stored OTP value**: `"<hex_hash>:<hex_salt>"` — same as Python.
- **Hash**: HMAC-SHA256 with a `crypto/rand` 16-byte salt — same as
`hash_code()`.
- **Constants**: `OTP_LENGTH=4`, `OTP_TTL=5min`, `ATTEMPT_LIMIT=5`,
`ATTEMPT_LOCK_SECONDS=30min`, `RESEND_COOLDOWN_SECONDS=60s` — all match
`api/utils/web_utils.py`.
- **Email body**: matches `RESET_CODE_EMAIL_TMPL` byte-for-byte.
## Files
### New
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
| `internal/utility/otp.go` | OTP/captcha constants, Redis key builders
(`CaptchaRedisKey`, `OTPRedisKeys`, `OTPVerifiedRedisKey`),
`HashOTPCode`, `GenerateOTPCode` / `GenerateCaptchaCode` /
`GenerateOTPSalt` via `crypto/rand`, and `EncodeOTPStorageValue` /
`DecodeOTPStorageValue` matching Python's storage shape. |
| `internal/utility/smtp.go` | Minimal stdlib `net/smtp` sender.
`SendResetCodeEmail(to, otp, ttlMin)` builds an RFC 5322 plain-text
message and dispatches via implicit TLS / STARTTLS / plain — same
selectors as Python `aiosmtplib`. Returns `SMTPNotConfiguredError` if
the config block is empty. |
### Modified
| File | Change |
|---|---|
| `internal/server/config.go` | New `SMTPConfig` struct + `Config.SMTP`
field. Field names mirror the `smtp:` keys in `common/settings.py`
(`mail_server`, `mail_port`, `mail_use_ssl`, `mail_use_tls`,
`mail_username`, `mail_password`, `mail_from_name`, `mail_from_address`,
`mail_frontend_url`) so a single `conf/service_conf.yaml` powers both
backends. |
| `internal/service/user.go` | Four methods — `ForgotIssueCaptcha`,
`ForgotSendOTP`, `ForgotVerifyOTP`, `ForgotResetPassword`. Reuses the
existing `decryptPassword`, `HashPassword`, `userDAO.Update`, and
`utility.GenerateToken` so the reset+auto-login path is identical to
`LoginByEmail`. |
| `internal/handler/user.go` | Four handlers in the same `c.JSON` shape
as `LoginByEmail`. The reset handler rotates the access token and emits
an `Authorization` header for auto-login (matches Python
`construct_response(auth=user.get_id())`). |
| `internal/router/router.go` | Routes registered under `apiNoAuth`,
with an explanatory comment on why they sit outside the auth middleware.
|
## Known divergence — captcha rendering
The Python endpoint returns a rendered `image/JPEG` from the
`python-captcha` library. The Go side has **no image-captcha dependency
vendored** in `go.mod`, and hand-rolling a raster generator was out of
scope for this PR.
This commit returns JSON `{captcha: "<text>"}` instead. Implications:
- **Backend gate is identical** — the OTP step still verifies the
user-submitted captcha string against the Redis value, so the security
model is unchanged.
- **Frontend impact**: the password-reset page rendering needs a small
tweak (text display instead of `<img>`) until a Go captcha library is
wired in.
- The handler comments call this out explicitly so the next PR knows
what to swap.
Possible follow-ups (any one closes the gap):
1. Add `github.com/mojocn/base64Captcha` or `github.com/dchest/captcha`
to `go.mod` and replace the JSON response with an `image/JPEG`.
2. Hand-roll a 5x7 bitmap font + `image/png` writer using only the
stdlib.
3. Render a server-side SVG (cheap, but trivially OCR-able — only useful
as a UI shim).
## Test plan
- [ ] **Captcha**: `POST
/api/v1/auth/password/forgot/captcha?email=<existing>` returns `{code:
0, data: {captcha: "ABCD"}}`. Redis shows `captcha:<email>` with that
value and ~60s TTL. Unknown email returns `code: CodeDataError`.
- [ ] **OTP send**: `POST /api/v1/auth/password/forgot/otp` with the
right captcha mints an OTP, stores `<hash>:<salt>` under `otp:<email>`
for 5 min, sends an email, returns success. With a wrong captcha returns
`CodeAuthenticationError`. Hitting it again within 60s returns "you
still have to wait …" with `CodeNotEffective`.
- [ ] **OTP verify**: correct OTP → `code: 0`, OTP keys cleared,
`otp:verified:<email>` = `"1"`. Wrong OTP → `code:
CodeAuthenticationError`, attempt counter bumped; after 5 wrong tries
`otp_lock:<email>` is set and further attempts hit `CodeNotEffective`.
- [ ] **Reset**: with the verified flag set, supply a new password
(RSA-encrypted+base64, same as `LoginByEmail`). Returns `code: 0`,
`Authorization` header set, verified flag deleted. Without the verified
flag returns `CodeAuthenticationError`.
- [ ] **Wire-compat smoke**: mint an OTP from the Python backend, verify
it via the Go endpoint, and vice versa. Should both succeed.
- [ ] **SMTP misconfigured**: drop `smtp.mail_server` from
`conf/service_conf.yaml`. The OTP-send endpoint should now return
"failed to send email" without panicking; check the log for the
`SMTPNotConfiguredError` warning.
- [ ] **End-to-end FE**: hit the password-reset flow from
`web/src/pages/login-next/`. Confirm the text-captcha shim works after
the FE tweak.
- [ ] `go build ./...` and `go vet ./...` — I could not run these in the
sandbox; please confirm a clean build before merging.
- [ ] `uv run pytest` to confirm no Python regressions (shared Redis
schema).
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## Summary
- Implemented the Go API endpoint for Memory message forgetting:
- `DELETE /api/v1/messages/{memory_id}:{message_id}`
- Added route registration for the Memory message DELETE endpoint only.
- Added request path validation for `memory_id:message_id`.
- Added service logic to mark a message as forgotten by setting
`forget_at`.
- Preserved Python-compatible response behavior:
- Success returns `code: 0`, `message: true`, `data: null`.
- Added focused unit tests for message path parsing and invalid message
ID handling.
- Fixed Linux cgo linker config to use the installed shared PCRE2
library so Go tests/builds can run in this environment.
## Related Issue
Closes: #15240
## Change Type
- [x] Feature
- [x] Test
- [x] Build / CI compatibility
## Implemented API
- `DELETE /api/v1/messages/{memory_id}:{message_id}`
## Real Behavior Proof
Validated with targeted Go tests:
```bash
/tmp/go1.25.0/bin/go test ./internal/handler ./internal/router
```
Result:
```text
ok ragflow/internal/handler
? ragflow/internal/router [no test files]
```
Validated server entrypoint build:
```bash
/tmp/go1.25.0/bin/go build -o /tmp/ragflow-server-main ./cmd/server_main.go
```
Result:
```text
build succeeded
```
Validated patch formatting:
```bash
git diff --check
```
Result:
```text
no whitespace errors
```
## Checklist
- [x] Implemented only `DELETE
/api/v1/messages/{memory_id}:{message_id}`.
- [x] Did not implement unrelated Memory message APIs.
- [x] Added route registration.
- [x] Added handler validation.
- [x] Added service-level memory access check.
- [x] Added tests.
- [x] Ran targeted Go tests.
- [x] Ran server build validation.
- [x] Ran `git diff --check`.
### What problem does this PR solve?
This PR fixes several behavior gaps in the Go implementation of the user
registration API.
### Type of change
- Make `nickname` required for user registration.
- Align registration error messages and response data with expected API
behavior.
- Handle password decryption errors for registration more consistently.
- Generate UUID v1-style IDs for new users, access tokens, tenants,
user-tenant records, and root files.
- Initialize default user fields during registration, including:
- language
- color schema
- timezone
- last login time
- Create user, tenant, user-tenant relation, tenant LLM records, and
root folder in a single DB transaction.
- Initialize default tenant LLM records from configured default models.
- Avoid partial registration data when one creation step fails.
- Use locale-based default language fallback for user profile responses.
### What problem does this PR solve?
Fixes the `/user/me` response so it returns the current user's model
settings correctly.
### Type of change
- Added model settings data to the `/user/me` response.
- Kept the response structure compatible with existing user profile
fields.
- Avoided changing unrelated user/session behavior.
### What problem does this PR solve?
- Add Go implementation parity for `PATCH /api/v1/users/me`.
- This updates the Go user settings endpoint to match the Python
behavior for updating the current user's profile settings.
### Changes
- Route `PATCH /api/v1/users/me` through the authenticated current user
from middleware.
- Add `password` and `new_password` support to `UpdateSettingsRequest`.
- Prevent `email` from being updated through this endpoint, matching the
Python blacklist behavior.
- Support updating:
- `nickname`
- `avatar`
- `language`
- `color_schema`
- `timezone`
- `password`
- Align password handling with Python:
- invalid plaintext password payload returns `CodeExceptionError`
- wrong old password returns `Password error!`
- successful update returns `{ code: 0, data: true, message: "success"
}`
### Test
Tested manually with Python and Go backends using the same request
bodies:
- `PATCH /api/v1/users/me` with nickname/timezone update
- plaintext password payload returns Python-compatible `Incorrect
padding`
- wrong old password returns `Password error!`
### What problem does this PR solve?
1. Update API URL
2. Add password encryption
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
Signed-off-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Since secret key get and set logic is updated, the go server also need
to update.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
---------
Signed-off-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
1. Refactor server_main
2. Add volcengine
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
---------
Signed-off-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feat： Add Memory function by go
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
---------
Co-authored-by: Yingfeng <yingfeng.zhang@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Go cli
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
---------
Signed-off-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
1. Allow admin@ragflow.io login go ragflow server
2. Fix go server start error.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
Signed-off-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
1. Fix go server date precision
2. Use API_SCHEME_PROXY to control the web API route
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
---------
Signed-off-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Fix: Enhanced user management functionality and cascading data deletion.
Added tenant and related data initialization functionality during user
creation, including tenants, user-tenant relationships, LLM
configuration, and root folder.
Added cascading deletion logic for user deletion, ensuring that all
associated data is cleaned up simultaneously when a user is deleted.
Implemented a Werkzeug-compatible password hash algorithm (scrypt) and
verification functionality.
Added multiple DAO methods to support batch data operations and
cascading deletion.
Improved user login processing and added token signing functionality.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
feat(admin): Implemented default administrator initialization and login
functionality.
Added support for default administrator configuration, including super
user nickname, email, and password.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
1. RAGFlow server will send heartbeat periodically.
2. This PR will including:
- Scheduled task
- API server message sending
- Admin server API to receive the message.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
---------
Signed-off-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
feat: Added LLM factory initialization functionality and knowledge base
related API interfaces
refactor(dao): Refactored the TenantLLMDAO query method
feat(handler): Implemented knowledge base related API endpoints
feat(service): Added LLM API key setting functionality
feat(model): Extended the knowledge base model definition
feat(config): Added default user LLM configuration
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Add APIs to admin server.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
---------
Signed-off-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Since database model is updated in python version, go server also need
to update
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
---------
Signed-off-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feat：Using Go to implement user registration logic
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
# RAGFlow Go Implementation Plan 🚀
This repository tracks the progress of porting RAGFlow to Go. We'll
implement core features and provide performance comparisons between
Python and Go versions.
## Implementation Checklist
- [x] User Management APIs
- [x] Dataset Management Operations
- [x] Retrieval Test
- [x] Chat Management Operations
- [x] Infinity Go SDK
---------
Signed-off-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yingfeng Zhang <yingfeng.zhang@gmail.com>
