Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Wang Qi
d6fc50a469 Fix: no more @token_required (#15562)
Fix: no more @token_required
2026-06-03 16:24:08 +08:00
Jin Hai
e1f19f6679 Go: fix gitee balance api (#15554)
```
RAGFlow(user)> create provider 'gitee' instance 'intl' key 'api-token' url 'https://ai.gitee.com/v1' region 'intl';
SUCCESS
```

---------

Signed-off-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
2026-06-03 13:23:20 +08:00
nickmopen
5b02fe4841 fix(api): stop duplicating answer in openai-compatible chat completions stream (#15286) (#15443)
### What problem does this PR solve?

Fixes #15286.

When calling `/api/v1/openai/<chat_id>/chat/completions` with `"stream":
true`, the response contains the answer **twice** — the final message
repeats everything that was already streamed.

#### Root cause

RAGFlow's `async_chat` streams the body as incremental `delta.content`
chunks, then emits a terminating `final` event whose `answer` is the
**complete** (decorated) message. The handler re-emitted that full
answer as one more `delta.content` chunk:

```python
if ans.get("final"):
    if ans.get("answer"):
        full_content = ans["answer"]
        response["choices"][0]["delta"]["content"] = full_content   # <-- whole answer again
        yield ...
```

So a client accumulating `delta.content` ends up with the message
duplicated.

#### Fix

Drop the re-emission. The complete answer from the `final` event is now
surfaced **only** through the trailing chunk's `final_content` and
`reference` fields, which matches OpenAI streaming semantics: deltas are
incremental, and the final chunk carries only `finish_reason` / `usage`
(plus RAGFlow's `reference` / `final_content` extensions).

This matches the expected behavior described in the issue: "The stream
should only yield content chunks once, and the final message should only
contain reference, usage, and finish_reason."

#### Testability refactor

The streaming SSE assembly was a closure inside the request handler, so
it could only be exercised against a live server + real LLM. I extracted
it into a module-level `_stream_chat_completion_sse` async generator
(behavior-preserving) so it can be unit-tested with a fake event stream.

#### Tests

Adds
`test/unit_test/api/apps/restful_apis/test_openai_stream_no_duplicate.py`
(same import-stub pattern as the existing `test_get_agent_session.py`):

- body is streamed exactly once (the regression);
- the complete answer is never re-emitted as a content chunk;
- the terminating chunk has `finish_reason="stop"`, `content=None`, and
correct `usage`;
- `final_content` / `reference` are present on the trailing chunk;
- reasoning (`think`) deltas stream separately and are not duplicated.

> Note: this is unrelated to #15442, which only changes the `stream`
default — it does not touch the duplication logic.

### Type of change

- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] Added test cases

---------

Co-authored-by: Wang Qi <wangq8@outlook.com>
2026-06-02 13:20:40 +08:00
Rene Arredondo
e1403171f1 fix(chat): sanitize NaN/Inf scores before serializing chat completions (#15245) (#15266)
## Summary

Fixes #15245 — `POST /api/v1/chat/completions` with `stream=true`
intermittently returns 500:

```
data:{"code": 500, "message": "failed to encode response: json:
unsupported value: NaN (status code: 500)", "data": {...}}
```

…even though "the same question" works on retry.

## Root cause

The streaming path serialized the answer with bare `json.dumps(...)`
(`api/apps/restful_apis/chat_api.py:1221`). `json.dumps` defaults to
`allow_nan=True` and emits the literal token `NaN` for NaN /
Infinity float values. That is valid Python-flavored JSON but
**invalid per RFC 8259**, so downstream consumers reject it. The
reporter's gateway is Go-based and the error wording
(`failed to encode response: json: unsupported value: NaN`) is
straight from Go's `encoding/json`.

How NaN gets into the payload: retrieval scoring in
`rag/nlp/search.py` runs `np.mean(...)` over aggregations that can
be empty, and similarity denominators can be zero. Reference chunk
fields like `similarity`, `vector_similarity`, `term_similarity`
can therefore be NaN depending on which chunks a given query
retrieves — which is exactly why the failure is intermittent for
the same question.

The non-streaming branch (`get_json_result(data=answer)`,
`chat_api.py:1243`) has the same vulnerability — Quart's `jsonify`
also defaults to `allow_nan=True` and the same retrieval pipeline
feeds both branches.

`agent/tools/exesql.py:88-102` already has the same NaN/Inf guard
for SQL results. This PR brings the chat completions path up to
parity.

## Fix

Add a small `_sanitize_json_floats(obj)` helper near the top of
`api/apps/restful_apis/chat_api.py`. It walks `dict` / `list` /
`tuple` and replaces any `float` that is `NaN` or `±Infinity` with
`None`. Apply it at the two serialization boundaries:

- **Streaming branch** (`stream()`): sanitize the SSE payload before
  `json.dumps`.
- **Non-streaming branch**: sanitize the `answer` dict before
  `get_json_result(data=...)`.

The terminal `data:True` frame and the `code:500` error frame carry
no scores and are left untouched.

Added `import math` to the existing alphabetical import block.

No change to retrieval logic — replacing NaN with `null` at the
serialization boundary is conservative: clients still parse the
JSON, a missing-score chunk is a strictly better failure mode than
a 500 that kills the whole reply.

### Type of change

- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
2026-06-02 10:08:34 +08:00
Lynn
dc4b82523b Feat: tenant llm provider (#14595)
### What problem does this PR solve?

Python implementation of the Go-based model_provider API suite.

### Type of change

- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

---------

Co-authored-by: bill <yibie_jingnian@163.com>
2026-05-29 17:39:41 +08:00
Wang Qi
87918650ff Refactor: Move API files (#15151)
Refactor: Move API files
2026-05-22 17:44:05 +08:00
Full Stack Developer
8f90740d2e feat: pass chat_template_kwargs through agent chat completion (#14542)
### What problem does this PR solve?

The agent API currently does not pass chat_template_kwargs to the
underlying LLM call path, so clients cannot control template-level model
behavior (such as thinking-mode toggles) when invoking
/agents/chat/completion. This PR adds passthrough support for
chat_template_kwargs across agent execution flows (session and
non-session, streaming and non-streaming) by propagating it through
canvas runtime state and into LLM invocation kwargs. This addresses the
feature gap raised in [Issue
#14182](https://github.com/infiniflow/ragflow/issues/14182).

Closes #14182 

### Type of change

- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2026-05-22 15:15:49 +08:00
Haruko386
a725e114f9 Go: implement ASR and TTS for Xinference (#15096)
### What problem does this PR solve?

implement ASR and TTS for Xinference

### Type of change

- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] Refactoring
2026-05-21 18:28:06 +08:00
dripsmvcp
12a148d541 fix(api): guard against missing session in get_agent_session (#15011)
`GET /agents/<agent_id>/sessions/<session_id>` crashed with
`AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'to_dict'` when the
session lookup failed: `_, conv =
API4ConversationService.get_by_id(...)` returned `(False, None)`, then
`conv.to_dict()` was called unconditionally.

This is reachable in multi-instance deployments: the session row may not
yet be visible on the node servicing the immediate follow-up GET after a
session is created on a different node.

Add the same `if not exists` guard already used by every other call site
of `API4ConversationService.get_by_id` (see agent_api.py:1147,
sdk/session.py:179, conversation_service.py:248, canvas_service.py:323).

Closes #14989

### What problem does this PR solve?

_Briefly describe what this PR aims to solve. Include background context
that will help reviewers understand the purpose of the PR._

### Type of change

- [ ] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Refactoring
- [ ] Performance Improvement
- [ ] Other (please describe):
2026-05-21 15:37:10 +08:00
dripsmvcp
440153c378 fix(api): check kb ownership in /dify/retrieval (#15028)
POST /api/v1/dify/retrieval resolved the caller via @apikey_required
(injecting tenant_id) but then fetched the requested knowledge_id with
no tenant filter and ran the full retrieval pipeline against
kb.tenant_id (the owner). Any valid Dify-compatible API key could
retrieve chunks from any tenant whose KB UUID was known. Adds the
missing ownership check.

## Root Cause
api/apps/sdk/dify_retrieval.py line 253:
KnowledgebaseService.get_by_id(kb_id) fetched the KB by id alone, then
the handler used kb.tenant_id (the OWNER) to build the embedding model
and call the retriever. The caller tenant_id was only used downstream at
line 278 for retrieval_by_children, well after cross-tenant data was
already retrieved.

grep confirmed there was no KnowledgebaseService.accessible call
anywhere in the handler.

## Fix
Two-line guard immediately after the existing get_by_id lookup,
mirroring the pattern PR #14749 lands for the sibling sdk/doc.py routes
(download, parse, stop_parsing, retrieval_test):

    e, kb = KnowledgebaseService.get_by_id(kb_id)
    if not e:
return build_error_result(message="Knowledgebase not found!",
code=RetCode.NOT_FOUND)
+   if not KnowledgebaseService.accessible(kb_id, tenant_id):
+ return build_error_result(message="No authorization.",
code=RetCode.AUTHENTICATION_ERROR)
    if kb.tenant_embd_id:
        ...

KnowledgebaseService.accessible already handles solo-tenant ownership,
team membership via TenantService.get_joined_tenants_by_user_id, and the
permission=ME distinction. No behavior change for legitimate callers;
cross-tenant callers now receive RetCode.AUTHENTICATION_ERROR (109).

## Test Plan
- [x] Regression test added:
test/unit_test/api/apps/sdk/test_dify_retrieval.py
- test_cross_tenant_request_is_rejected -- attacker tenant calling owner
tenant KB gets 109; retriever is not invoked
- test_same_tenant_request_succeeds -- owner tenant gets the records
back
- test_missing_knowledge_base_returns_not_found -- missing KB returns
404 BEFORE the access check fires (legit callers see the clearer
message)
- [x] All 3 tests pass after the fix
- [x] Cross-tenant test FAILS on pre-fix main (KeyError on result[code]
because handler leaks records dict instead of returning auth error)
- [x] ruff check clean on both changed files
- [x] No drive-by reformatting in dify_retrieval.py -- only the 2 added
lines

### Post-fix output

    test_cross_tenant_request_is_rejected           PASSED [ 33%]
    test_same_tenant_request_succeeds               PASSED [ 66%]
    test_missing_knowledge_base_returns_not_found   PASSED [100%]

============================== 3 passed in 0.04s
===============================

Closes #15027
2026-05-21 13:29:00 +08:00