5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
kpdev
faf77a5a8a feat(evaluation): track token usage in evaluation results (#13487)
## Summary

Implements the TODO in `evaluation_service.py`: **Track token usage** in
evaluation results.

## Changes

- **Import** `num_tokens_from_string` from `common.token_utils`
- **Prompt tokens**: Use the full prompt returned by `async_chat` when
available (includes system prompt + knowledge base + query), otherwise
fall back to the question token count
- **Completion tokens**: Count tokens in the generated answer
- **Storage**: Store `token_usage` as `{prompt_tokens,
completion_tokens, total_tokens}` in each `EvaluationResult` instead of
`None`

## Why

The evaluation pipeline previously saved `token_usage: None` for every
result. This change allows downstream consumers (e.g. evaluation
dashboards, cost tracking) to see approximate token usage per test case
using the same tokenizer (tiktoken cl100k_base) used elsewhere in
RAGFlow.

## Testing

- No new tests added; existing evaluation flow unchanged
- Token counting uses existing `num_tokens_from_string` utility

---------

Co-authored-by: kiannidev <kiannidev@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-22 15:19:53 +08:00
Stephen Hu
02e6870755 Refactor: import_test_cases use bulk_create (#12456)
### What problem does this PR solve?

import_test_cases use bulk_create

### Type of change

- [x] Refactoring
2026-01-06 11:39:07 +08:00
Stephen Hu
9883c572cd Refactor: keep timestamp consistency (#12279)
### What problem does this PR solve?

keep timestamp consistency

### Type of change

- [x] Refactoring
2025-12-29 12:02:43 +08:00
Yongteng Lei
51ec708c58 Refa: cleanup synchronous functions in chat_model and implement synchronization for conversation and dialog chats (#11779)
### What problem does this PR solve?

Cleanup synchronous functions in chat_model and implement
synchronization for conversation and dialog chats.

### Type of change

- [x] Refactoring
- [x] Performance Improvement
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
hsparks-codes
237a66913b Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?

Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.

**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?

**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs

**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.

### Type of change

- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 17:00:58 +08:00