## Summary
- **Backend**: `_iter_session_completion_events` in `agent_api.py` was
filtering out `user_inputs` and `workflow_finished` SSE events, causing
agents with UserFillUp components to silently fail in explore mode — the
interactive form never appeared, while the same agent worked correctly
in run (editor) mode.
- **Frontend**: `SessionChat` component in explore mode was missing
`DebugContent` children rendering inside `MessageItem`, so even if the
backend forwarded the events, the form UI would not render. Added
`DebugContent`, `MarkdownContent`, `useAwaitCompentData` hook, and
input-disabling logic to match the run mode's `chat/box.tsx` behavior.
## What was changed
### Backend (`api/apps/restful_apis/agent_api.py`)
- Line 266: Added `"user_inputs"` and `"workflow_finished"` to the
allowed event filter in `_iter_session_completion_events`
### Frontend (`web/src/pages/agent/explore/components/session-chat.tsx`)
- Added imports: `DebugContent`, `MarkdownContent`,
`useAwaitCompentData`, `useParams`
- Added `sendFormMessage` from `useSendSessionMessage()` hook
- Added `useAwaitCompentData` hook for form state management
- Added `DebugContent` as `MessageItem` children for the latest
assistant message (renders UserFillUp form)
- Added `MarkdownContent` + submitted values display for previous
assistant messages
- Updated `NextMessageInput` disabled states to respect `isWaitting`
(form submission in progress)
## Test plan
- [x] Agent with UserFillUp component (e.g., email draft with
send/edit/cancel options) shows interactive form in **explore mode**
- [x] Same agent continues to work correctly in **run (editor) mode**
- [x] Form submission sends data back to the agent and workflow
continues
- [x] Input field is disabled while waiting for form submission
- [ ] Agents without UserFillUp components are unaffected in explore
mode
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Zhichang Yu <yuzhichang@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Fixes#15456.
The SDK agent-bot routes `POST /api/v1/agentbots/<agent_id>/completions`
and `GET /api/v1/agentbots/<agent_id>/inputs`
(`api/apps/restful_apis/bot_api.py`) authenticate the caller with a beta
API token — which only yields the caller's `tenant_id` — but then load
and run the agent named in the URL **without verifying the agent belongs
to the caller's tenant**. `UserCanvasService.get_agent_dsl_with_release`
even accepts a `tenant_id` it never uses, and `begin_inputs` calls
`get_by_id` directly. Any holder of a single valid beta token could
therefore run another tenant's agent (leaking its DSL/prompts/tool
config) or read another tenant's agent metadata and begin input form,
just by substituting a victim `agent_id`.
This PR adds the project's existing ownership gate,
`UserCanvasService.accessible(agent_id, tenant_id)`, to both endpoints
right after token authentication — mirroring the checks already enforced
on the equivalent first-party routes in
`api/apps/restful_apis/agent_api.py` (lines 75/578/775) and on the
sibling `chatbot_completions` / `create_agent_session` /
`delete_agent_session` handlers in the same file. On failure it returns
the same `Can't find agent by ID: <id>` message already used by
`begin_inputs`, so it does not reveal whether an `agent_id` exists in
another tenant.
Added a regression test
(`test/unit_test/api/apps/restful_apis/test_agentbots_access_control.py`,
following the existing stubbed-loader pattern from
`test_get_agent_session.py`) asserting that an inaccessible `agent_id`
is rejected before the agent is loaded (`begin_inputs`) or executed
(`completions`), and that an accessible agent still proceeds.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Refactoring
- [ ] Performance Improvement
- [ ] Other (please describe):
---------
Co-authored-by: Zhichang Yu <yuzhichang@gmail.com>
## Summary
Fixes#14985 — clicking the **Thinking** button in a shared/embedded
chat returns 401 and bounces the user to the login page, even though
the same share page can chat with the agent just fine.
## Root cause
In shared chat, `useGetSharedChatSearchParams` binds `conversationId`
to the URL's `shared_id` query param — which is the **beta APIToken**,
not the real agent id. That `conversationId` propagates through the
component tree:
```tsx
<WorkFlowTimeline canvasId={conversationId}>
→ useFetchMessageTrace(canvasId)
→ GET /api/v1/agents/<sharedId>/logs/<messageId>
```
But `/agents/<agent_id>/logs/<message_id>` is decorated with
`@login_required` (`api/apps/restful_apis/agent_api.py:842-846`).
The share page only holds the beta token — there is no session JWT
— so the request 401s and quart-auth redirects to the login page.
The reporter's server log matches exactly:
```
load_user from jwt got exception No b'.' found in value
load_user: No APIToken found for token=ULG10SWG3E...
Unauthorized request (quart_auth)
GET /api/v1/agents/394013f8d42211f0bad6123fa55e8ed9/logs/96fd72e2-... 1.1 401
```
The `394013f8...` segment in the URL is the `shared_id` (beta
token), not an actual agent id. `_load_user` already accepts the
regular `APIToken.token` field, but not `APIToken.beta`, by design
— beta is a much weaker share-link credential than a personal API
key.
The sibling endpoints `/agentbots/<id>/completions` and
`/agentbots/<id>/inputs` already use the right auth pattern for
this scope (beta-token via `_get_sdk_authorization_token` →
`APIToken.query(beta=token)`). Trace just didn't have a parallel.
## Fix
### Backend (`api/apps/restful_apis/bot_api.py`)
Added a beta-token sibling endpoint:
```
GET /api/v1/agentbots/<shared_id>/logs/<message_id>
```
- Same auth shape as the existing `agentbots` endpoints.
- The `<shared_id>` path segment is a client-supplied label only.
The real `agent_id` used to build the Redis key
(`<agent_id>-<message_id>-logs`) is taken from
`APIToken.dialog_id` on the looked-up token, so the endpoint
never trusts client-supplied identifiers for the data lookup.
- Returns the same `{data: ...}` shape as the existing
`/agents/<id>/logs/<message_id>` endpoint, so the frontend
doesn't need to reshape the response.
### Frontend
- `web/src/utils/api.ts`: added `sharedTrace(sharedId, messageId)`
URL builder.
- `web/src/services/agent-service.ts`: added
`fetchSharedTrace({ shared_id, message_id })`.
- `web/src/hooks/use-agent-request.ts`: `useFetchMessageTrace`
takes an optional `isShare` argument. When set, it calls
`fetchSharedTrace`; `isShare` is also folded into the
`queryKey` so the two modes never share cached results.
- `web/src/pages/agent/log-sheet/workflow-timeline.tsx`:
forwards the already-existing `isShare` prop into the hook.
All other existing call sites of `useFetchMessageTrace` (webhook
timeline, pipeline log, dataflow result) pass no `isShare`
argument → undefined → falsy → unchanged behavior.
## Test plan
- [ ] In the regular Agent UI (logged-in user): open the trace /
log sheet for any message and click into "Thinking" — the
timeline should still load via `/agents/<id>/logs/<msg>`,
same as before.
- [ ] From the Agent page, click **Chat in new tab** to open
`/chat/share?shared_id=<token>&from=agent`. Send a message,
wait for a response, then click **Thinking** on the
assistant turn. The trace panel should load instead of
redirecting to the login page.
- [ ] Same flow but with the agent embedded in an iframe ("Embed
into webpage") — confirm there is no login redirect.
- [ ] In DevTools → Network, confirm the share-chat trace request
goes to `/api/v1/agentbots/<sharedId>/logs/<msgId>` and
returns 200 with the same JSON shape as the logged-in path.
- [ ] Confirm the chat completions, inputs, and upload flows in
the share page still work — they were not touched.
- [ ] Send a bogus / expired beta token to the new endpoint and
confirm it returns the standard "Authentication error: API
key is invalid!" response (no traceback, no 500).
- [ ] Run `uv run pytest` to make sure no existing tests regress.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Refactoring
- [ ] Performance Improvement
- [ ] Other (please describe):
---------
Co-authored-by: Zhichang Yu <yuzhichang@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
When embedding a chatbot, the API returned `"Model Name is required"`.
The embed widget now includes the assistant's `llm_id` as `model_name`
in the completion request.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix
### How has this been tested?
- Created a chatbot with a default model.
- Embedded it and sent a message – the error is gone and the assistant
replies correctly.
### Related Issue
Closes#15883
Co-authored-by: RAGFlow Dev <dev@ragflow.local>
Co-authored-by: Wang Qi <wangq8@outlook.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Fix:
- Verify provider with empty llm list in llm_factories.json
- Set search bot's chat_llm_name, use tenant default chat model as
default
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Python implementation of the Go-based model_provider API suite.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
---------
Co-authored-by: bill <yibie_jingnian@163.com>
