Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
#
# Copyright 2025 The InfiniFlow Authors. All Rights Reserved.
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
#
"""
RAG Evaluation Service
Provides functionality for evaluating RAG system performance including :
- Dataset management
- Test case management
- Evaluation execution
- Metrics computation
- Configuration recommendations
"""
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
import asyncio
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
import logging
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
import queue
import threading
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
from typing import List , Dict , Any , Optional , Tuple
from datetime import datetime
from timeit import default_timer as timer
from api . db . db_models import EvaluationDataset , EvaluationCase , EvaluationRun , EvaluationResult
from api . db . services . common_service import CommonService
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
from api . db . services . dialog_service import DialogService
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
from common . misc_utils import get_uuid
from common . time_utils import current_timestamp
from common . constants import StatusEnum
2026-05-22 00:19:53 -07:00
from common . token_utils import num_tokens_from_string
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
class EvaluationService ( CommonService ) :
""" Service for managing RAG evaluations """
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
model = EvaluationDataset
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# ==================== Dataset Management ====================
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
@classmethod
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
def create_dataset ( cls , name : str , description : str , kb_ids : List [ str ] , tenant_id : str , user_id : str ) - > Tuple [ bool , str ] :
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
"""
Create a new evaluation dataset .
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
Args :
name : Dataset name
description : Dataset description
kb_ids : List of knowledge base IDs to evaluate against
tenant_id : Tenant ID
user_id : User ID who creates the dataset
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
Returns :
( success , dataset_id or error_message )
"""
try :
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
timestamp = current_timestamp ( )
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
dataset_id = get_uuid ( )
dataset = {
" id " : dataset_id ,
" tenant_id " : tenant_id ,
" name " : name ,
" description " : description ,
" kb_ids " : kb_ids ,
" created_by " : user_id ,
2025-12-29 12:02:43 +08:00
" create_time " : timestamp ,
" update_time " : timestamp ,
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
" status " : StatusEnum . VALID . value ,
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
}
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
if not EvaluationDataset . create ( * * dataset ) :
return False , " Failed to create dataset "
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
return True , dataset_id
except Exception as e :
logging . error ( f " Error creating evaluation dataset: { e } " )
return False , str ( e )
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
@classmethod
def get_dataset ( cls , dataset_id : str ) - > Optional [ Dict [ str , Any ] ] :
""" Get dataset by ID """
try :
dataset = EvaluationDataset . get_by_id ( dataset_id )
if dataset :
return dataset . to_dict ( )
return None
except Exception as e :
logging . error ( f " Error getting dataset { dataset_id } : { e } " )
return None
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
@classmethod
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
def list_datasets ( cls , tenant_id : str , user_id : str , page : int = 1 , page_size : int = 20 ) - > Dict [ str , Any ] :
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
""" List datasets for a tenant """
try :
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
query = EvaluationDataset . select ( ) . where ( ( EvaluationDataset . tenant_id == tenant_id ) & ( EvaluationDataset . status == StatusEnum . VALID . value ) ) . order_by ( EvaluationDataset . create_time . desc ( ) )
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
total = query . count ( )
datasets = query . paginate ( page , page_size )
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
return { " total " : total , " datasets " : [ d . to_dict ( ) for d in datasets ] }
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
except Exception as e :
logging . error ( f " Error listing datasets: { e } " )
return { " total " : 0 , " datasets " : [ ] }
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
@classmethod
def update_dataset ( cls , dataset_id : str , * * kwargs ) - > bool :
""" Update dataset """
try :
kwargs [ " update_time " ] = current_timestamp ( )
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
return EvaluationDataset . update ( * * kwargs ) . where ( EvaluationDataset . id == dataset_id ) . execute ( ) > 0
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
except Exception as e :
logging . error ( f " Error updating dataset { dataset_id } : { e } " )
return False
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
@classmethod
def delete_dataset ( cls , dataset_id : str ) - > bool :
""" Soft delete dataset """
try :
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
return EvaluationDataset . update ( status = StatusEnum . INVALID . value , update_time = current_timestamp ( ) ) . where ( EvaluationDataset . id == dataset_id ) . execute ( ) > 0
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
except Exception as e :
logging . error ( f " Error deleting dataset { dataset_id } : { e } " )
return False
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# ==================== Test Case Management ====================
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
@classmethod
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
def add_test_case (
cls ,
dataset_id : str ,
question : str ,
reference_answer : Optional [ str ] = None ,
relevant_doc_ids : Optional [ List [ str ] ] = None ,
relevant_chunk_ids : Optional [ List [ str ] ] = None ,
metadata : Optional [ Dict [ str , Any ] ] = None ,
) - > Tuple [ bool , str ] :
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
"""
Add a test case to a dataset .
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
Args :
dataset_id : Dataset ID
question : Test question
reference_answer : Optional ground truth answer
relevant_doc_ids : Optional list of relevant document IDs
relevant_chunk_ids : Optional list of relevant chunk IDs
metadata : Optional additional metadata
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
Returns :
( success , case_id or error_message )
"""
try :
case_id = get_uuid ( )
case = {
" id " : case_id ,
" dataset_id " : dataset_id ,
" question " : question ,
" reference_answer " : reference_answer ,
" relevant_doc_ids " : relevant_doc_ids ,
" relevant_chunk_ids " : relevant_chunk_ids ,
" metadata " : metadata ,
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
" create_time " : current_timestamp ( ) ,
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
}
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
if not EvaluationCase . create ( * * case ) :
return False , " Failed to create test case "
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
return True , case_id
except Exception as e :
logging . error ( f " Error adding test case: { e } " )
return False , str ( e )
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
@classmethod
def get_test_cases ( cls , dataset_id : str ) - > List [ Dict [ str , Any ] ] :
""" Get all test cases for a dataset """
try :
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
cases = EvaluationCase . select ( ) . where ( EvaluationCase . dataset_id == dataset_id ) . order_by ( EvaluationCase . create_time )
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
return [ c . to_dict ( ) for c in cases ]
except Exception as e :
logging . error ( f " Error getting test cases for dataset { dataset_id } : { e } " )
return [ ]
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
@classmethod
def delete_test_case ( cls , case_id : str ) - > bool :
""" Delete a test case """
try :
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
return EvaluationCase . delete ( ) . where ( EvaluationCase . id == case_id ) . execute ( ) > 0
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
except Exception as e :
logging . error ( f " Error deleting test case { case_id } : { e } " )
return False
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
@classmethod
def import_test_cases ( cls , dataset_id : str , cases : List [ Dict [ str , Any ] ] ) - > Tuple [ int , int ] :
"""
Bulk import test cases from a list .
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
Args :
dataset_id : Dataset ID
cases : List of test case dictionaries
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
Returns :
( success_count , failure_count )
"""
success_count = 0
failure_count = 0
2026-01-06 11:39:07 +08:00
case_instances = [ ]
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
2026-01-06 11:39:07 +08:00
if not cases :
return success_count , failure_count
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
2026-01-06 11:39:07 +08:00
cur_timestamp = current_timestamp ( )
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
2026-01-06 11:39:07 +08:00
try :
for case_data in cases :
case_id = get_uuid ( )
case_info = {
" id " : case_id ,
" dataset_id " : dataset_id ,
" question " : case_data . get ( " question " , " " ) ,
" reference_answer " : case_data . get ( " reference_answer " ) ,
" relevant_doc_ids " : case_data . get ( " relevant_doc_ids " ) ,
" relevant_chunk_ids " : case_data . get ( " relevant_chunk_ids " ) ,
" metadata " : case_data . get ( " metadata " ) ,
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
" create_time " : cur_timestamp ,
2026-01-06 11:39:07 +08:00
}
case_instances . append ( EvaluationCase ( * * case_info ) )
EvaluationCase . bulk_create ( case_instances , batch_size = 300 )
success_count = len ( case_instances )
failure_count = 0
except Exception as e :
logging . error ( f " Error bulk importing test cases: { str ( e ) } " )
failure_count = len ( cases )
success_count = 0
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
return success_count , failure_count
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# ==================== Evaluation Execution ====================
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
@classmethod
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
def start_evaluation ( cls , dataset_id : str , dialog_id : str , user_id : str , name : Optional [ str ] = None ) - > Tuple [ bool , str ] :
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
"""
Start an evaluation run .
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
Args :
dataset_id : Dataset ID
dialog_id : Dialog configuration to evaluate
user_id : User ID who starts the run
name : Optional run name
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
Returns :
( success , run_id or error_message )
"""
try :
# Get dialog configuration
success , dialog = DialogService . get_by_id ( dialog_id )
if not success :
return False , " Dialog not found "
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# Create evaluation run
run_id = get_uuid ( )
if not name :
name = f " Evaluation Run { datetime . now ( ) . strftime ( ' % Y- % m- %d % H: % M: % S ' ) } "
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
run = {
" id " : run_id ,
" dataset_id " : dataset_id ,
" dialog_id " : dialog_id ,
" name " : name ,
" config_snapshot " : dialog . to_dict ( ) ,
" metrics_summary " : None ,
" status " : " RUNNING " ,
" created_by " : user_id ,
" create_time " : current_timestamp ( ) ,
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
" complete_time " : None ,
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
}
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
if not EvaluationRun . create ( * * run ) :
return False , " Failed to create evaluation run "
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# Execute evaluation asynchronously (in production, use task queue)
# For now, we'll execute synchronously
cls . _execute_evaluation ( run_id , dataset_id , dialog )
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
return True , run_id
except Exception as e :
logging . error ( f " Error starting evaluation: { e } " )
return False , str ( e )
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
@classmethod
def _execute_evaluation ( cls , run_id : str , dataset_id : str , dialog : Any ) :
"""
Execute evaluation for all test cases .
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
This method runs the RAG pipeline for each test case and computes metrics .
"""
try :
# Get all test cases
test_cases = cls . get_test_cases ( dataset_id )
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
if not test_cases :
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
EvaluationRun . update ( status = " FAILED " , complete_time = current_timestamp ( ) ) . where ( EvaluationRun . id == run_id ) . execute ( )
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
return
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# Execute each test case
results = [ ]
for case in test_cases :
result = cls . _evaluate_single_case ( run_id , case , dialog )
if result :
results . append ( result )
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# Compute summary metrics
metrics_summary = cls . _compute_summary_metrics ( results )
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# Update run status
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
EvaluationRun . update ( status = " COMPLETED " , metrics_summary = metrics_summary , complete_time = current_timestamp ( ) ) . where ( EvaluationRun . id == run_id ) . execute ( )
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
except Exception as e :
logging . error ( f " Error executing evaluation { run_id } : { e } " )
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
EvaluationRun . update ( status = " FAILED " , complete_time = current_timestamp ( ) ) . where ( EvaluationRun . id == run_id ) . execute ( )
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
@classmethod
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
def _evaluate_single_case ( cls , run_id : str , case : Dict [ str , Any ] , dialog : Any ) - > Optional [ Dict [ str , Any ] ] :
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
"""
Evaluate a single test case .
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
Args :
run_id : Evaluation run ID
case : Test case dictionary
dialog : Dialog configuration
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
Returns :
Result dictionary or None if failed
"""
try :
# Prepare messages
messages = [ { " role " : " user " , " content " : case [ " question " ] } ]
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# Execute RAG pipeline
start_time = timer ( )
answer = " "
retrieved_chunks = [ ]
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
def _sync_from_async_gen ( async_gen ) :
result_queue : queue . Queue = queue . Queue ( )
def runner ( ) :
loop = asyncio . new_event_loop ( )
asyncio . set_event_loop ( loop )
async def consume ( ) :
try :
async for item in async_gen :
result_queue . put ( item )
except Exception as e :
result_queue . put ( e )
finally :
result_queue . put ( StopIteration )
loop . run_until_complete ( consume ( ) )
loop . close ( )
threading . Thread ( target = runner , daemon = True ) . start ( )
while True :
item = result_queue . get ( )
if item is StopIteration :
break
if isinstance ( item , Exception ) :
raise item
yield item
def chat ( dialog , messages , stream = True , * * kwargs ) :
from api . db . services . dialog_service import async_chat
return _sync_from_async_gen ( async_chat ( dialog , messages , stream = stream , * * kwargs ) )
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
for ans in chat ( dialog , messages , stream = False ) :
if isinstance ( ans , dict ) :
answer = ans . get ( " answer " , " " )
retrieved_chunks = ans . get ( " reference " , { } ) . get ( " chunks " , [ ] )
break
2026-05-22 00:19:53 -07:00
else :
ans = { }
logging . warning (
" Evaluation case %s produced no answer from chat; token_usage will reflect empty output " ,
case . get ( " id " , " unknown " ) ,
)
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
execution_time = timer ( ) - start_time
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# Compute metrics
metrics = cls . _compute_metrics (
question = case [ " question " ] ,
generated_answer = answer ,
reference_answer = case . get ( " reference_answer " ) ,
retrieved_chunks = retrieved_chunks ,
relevant_chunk_ids = case . get ( " relevant_chunk_ids " ) ,
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
dialog = dialog ,
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
)
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
2026-05-22 00:19:53 -07:00
# Track token usage: use full prompt from async_chat when available.
# Note: Counts use tiktoken (cl100k_base), which matches OpenAI models but is an
# approximation for other providers (Anthropic, local models, etc.). Downstream
# consumers should treat these values as estimates for cost tracking.
full_prompt = ans . get ( " prompt " , " " )
if full_prompt :
prompt_tokens = num_tokens_from_string ( full_prompt )
else :
logging . debug (
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
" Evaluation case %s : ans has no ' prompt ' key; using question-only count (undercounts system + retrieved context) " ,
2026-05-22 00:19:53 -07:00
case . get ( " id " , " unknown " ) ,
)
prompt_tokens = num_tokens_from_string ( case . get ( " question " , " " ) or " " )
completion_tokens = num_tokens_from_string ( answer or " " )
token_usage = {
" prompt_tokens " : prompt_tokens ,
" completion_tokens " : completion_tokens ,
" total_tokens " : prompt_tokens + completion_tokens ,
}
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# Save result
result_id = get_uuid ( )
result = {
" id " : result_id ,
" run_id " : run_id ,
" case_id " : case [ " id " ] ,
" generated_answer " : answer ,
" retrieved_chunks " : retrieved_chunks ,
" metrics " : metrics ,
" execution_time " : execution_time ,
2026-05-22 00:19:53 -07:00
" token_usage " : token_usage ,
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
" create_time " : current_timestamp ( ) ,
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
}
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
EvaluationResult . create ( * * result )
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
return result
except Exception as e :
logging . error ( f " Error evaluating case { case . get ( ' id ' ) } : { e } " )
return None
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
@classmethod
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
def _compute_metrics (
cls , question : str , generated_answer : str , reference_answer : Optional [ str ] , retrieved_chunks : List [ Dict [ str , Any ] ] , relevant_chunk_ids : Optional [ List [ str ] ] , dialog : Any
) - > Dict [ str , float ] :
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
"""
Compute evaluation metrics for a single test case .
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
Returns :
Dictionary of metric names to values
"""
metrics = { }
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# Retrieval metrics (if ground truth chunks provided)
if relevant_chunk_ids :
retrieved_ids = [ c . get ( " chunk_id " ) for c in retrieved_chunks ]
metrics . update ( cls . _compute_retrieval_metrics ( retrieved_ids , relevant_chunk_ids ) )
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# Generation metrics
if generated_answer :
# Basic metrics
metrics [ " answer_length " ] = len ( generated_answer )
metrics [ " has_answer " ] = 1.0 if generated_answer . strip ( ) else 0.0
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# TODO: Implement advanced metrics using LLM-as-judge
# - Faithfulness (hallucination detection)
# - Answer relevance
# - Context relevance
# - Semantic similarity (if reference answer provided)
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
return metrics
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
@classmethod
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
def _compute_retrieval_metrics ( cls , retrieved_ids : List [ str ] , relevant_ids : List [ str ] ) - > Dict [ str , float ] :
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
"""
Compute retrieval metrics .
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
Args :
retrieved_ids : List of retrieved chunk IDs
relevant_ids : List of relevant chunk IDs ( ground truth )
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
Returns :
Dictionary of retrieval metrics
"""
if not relevant_ids :
return { }
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
retrieved_set = set ( retrieved_ids )
relevant_set = set ( relevant_ids )
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# Precision: proportion of retrieved that are relevant
precision = len ( retrieved_set & relevant_set ) / len ( retrieved_set ) if retrieved_set else 0.0
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# Recall: proportion of relevant that were retrieved
recall = len ( retrieved_set & relevant_set ) / len ( relevant_set ) if relevant_set else 0.0
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# F1 score
f1 = 2 * ( precision * recall ) / ( precision + recall ) if ( precision + recall ) > 0 else 0.0
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# Hit rate: whether any relevant chunk was retrieved
hit_rate = 1.0 if ( retrieved_set & relevant_set ) else 0.0
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# MRR (Mean Reciprocal Rank): position of first relevant chunk
mrr = 0.0
for i , chunk_id in enumerate ( retrieved_ids , 1 ) :
if chunk_id in relevant_set :
mrr = 1.0 / i
break
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
return { " precision " : precision , " recall " : recall , " f1_score " : f1 , " hit_rate " : hit_rate , " mrr " : mrr }
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
@classmethod
def _compute_summary_metrics ( cls , results : List [ Dict [ str , Any ] ] ) - > Dict [ str , Any ] :
"""
Compute summary metrics across all test cases .
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
Args :
results : List of result dictionaries
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
Returns :
Summary metrics dictionary
"""
if not results :
return { }
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# Aggregate metrics
metric_sums = { }
metric_counts = { }
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
for result in results :
metrics = result . get ( " metrics " , { } )
for key , value in metrics . items ( ) :
if isinstance ( value , ( int , float ) ) :
metric_sums [ key ] = metric_sums . get ( key , 0 ) + value
metric_counts [ key ] = metric_counts . get ( key , 0 ) + 1
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# Compute averages
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
summary = { " total_cases " : len ( results ) , " avg_execution_time " : sum ( r . get ( " execution_time " , 0 ) for r in results ) / len ( results ) }
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
for key in metric_sums :
summary [ f " avg_ { key } " ] = metric_sums [ key ] / metric_counts [ key ]
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
return summary
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# ==================== Results & Analysis ====================
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
@classmethod
def get_run_results ( cls , run_id : str ) - > Dict [ str , Any ] :
""" Get results for an evaluation run """
try :
run = EvaluationRun . get_by_id ( run_id )
if not run :
return { }
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
results = EvaluationResult . select ( ) . where ( EvaluationResult . run_id == run_id ) . order_by ( EvaluationResult . create_time )
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
return { " run " : run . to_dict ( ) , " results " : [ r . to_dict ( ) for r in results ] }
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
except Exception as e :
logging . error ( f " Error getting run results { run_id } : { e } " )
return { }
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
@classmethod
def get_recommendations ( cls , run_id : str ) - > List [ Dict [ str , Any ] ] :
"""
Analyze evaluation results and provide configuration recommendations .
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
Args :
run_id : Evaluation run ID
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
Returns :
List of recommendation dictionaries
"""
try :
run = EvaluationRun . get_by_id ( run_id )
if not run or not run . metrics_summary :
return [ ]
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
metrics = run . metrics_summary
recommendations = [ ]
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# Low precision: retrieving irrelevant chunks
if metrics . get ( " avg_precision " , 1.0 ) < 0.7 :
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
recommendations . append (
{
" issue " : " Low Precision " ,
" severity " : " high " ,
" description " : " System is retrieving many irrelevant chunks " ,
" suggestions " : [ " Increase similarity_threshold to filter out less relevant chunks " , " Enable reranking to improve chunk ordering " , " Reduce top_k to return fewer chunks " ] ,
}
)
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# Low recall: missing relevant chunks
if metrics . get ( " avg_recall " , 1.0 ) < 0.7 :
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
recommendations . append (
{
" issue " : " Low Recall " ,
" severity " : " high " ,
" description " : " System is missing relevant chunks " ,
" suggestions " : [
" Increase top_k to retrieve more chunks " ,
" Lower similarity_threshold to be more inclusive " ,
" Enable hybrid search (keyword + semantic) " ,
" Check chunk size - may be too large or too small " ,
] ,
}
)
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
# Slow response time
if metrics . get ( " avg_execution_time " , 0 ) > 5.0 :
2026-07-03 12:53:39 +08:00
recommendations . append (
{
" issue " : " Slow Response Time " ,
" severity " : " medium " ,
" description " : f " Average response time is { metrics [ ' avg_execution_time ' ] : .2f } s " ,
" suggestions " : [ " Reduce top_k to retrieve fewer chunks " , " Optimize embedding model selection " , " Consider caching frequently asked questions " ] ,
}
)
2025-12-08 09:43:03 +08:00
Feat: RAG evaluation (#11674)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Feature: This PR implements a comprehensive RAG evaluation framework to
address issue #11656.
**Problem**: Developers using RAGFlow lack systematic ways to measure
RAG accuracy and quality. They cannot objectively answer:
1. Are RAG results truly accurate?
2. How should configurations be adjusted to improve quality?
3. How to maintain and improve RAG performance over time?
**Solution**: This PR adds a complete evaluation system with:
- **Dataset & test case management** - Create ground truth datasets with
questions and expected answers
- **Automated evaluation** - Run RAG pipeline on test cases and compute
metrics
- **Comprehensive metrics** - Precision, recall, F1 score, MRR, hit rate
for retrieval quality
- **Smart recommendations** - Analyze results and suggest specific
configuration improvements (e.g., "increase top_k", "enable reranking")
- **20+ REST API endpoints** - Full CRUD operations for datasets, test
cases, and evaluation runs
**Impact**: Enables developers to objectively measure RAG quality,
identify issues, and systematically improve their RAG systems through
data-driven configuration tuning.
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
2025-12-03 04:00:58 -05:00
return recommendations
except Exception as e :
logging . error ( f " Error generating recommendations for run { run_id } : { e } " )
return [ ]