mirror of
https://github.com/vercel/workflow.git
synced 2026-09-14 19:59:43 +08:00
Mitul Shah
8a766884cf
* doen
* Fix: Old test file `test/format-duration-precise.test.ts` still asserts two-decimal output ("45.20s", "1m 0.00s") that no longer matches the trimmed-zero output of `formatDurationPrecise`, so `pnpm test`/CI fails.
This commit fixes the issue reported at packages/web-shared/test/format-duration-precise.test.ts:15
## Bug
The PR changed `formatDurationPrecise` (in `packages/web-shared/src/lib/utils.ts`) to trim trailing zeros by wrapping the fractional value in `Number(x.toFixed(fractionDigits))`:
```ts
if (normalizedMs < MS_IN_MINUTE) {
return `${Number((normalizedMs / MS_IN_SECOND).toFixed(fractionDigits))}s`;
}
...
parts.push(`${Number(seconds.toFixed(fractionDigits))}s`);
```
`Number("45.20")` → `45.2`, `Number("0.00")` → `0`, so whole/half seconds now render without padding.
A new test file `packages/web-shared/src/lib/utils.test.ts` reflects this behavior, but the pre-existing `packages/web-shared/test/format-duration-precise.test.ts` was left untouched and still asserts the **old** padded output.
## Concrete trigger
Reproduced the actual function output (integer decomposition + trimmed zeros):
| Input | Old assertion | New actual output |
|-------|---------------|-------------------|
| `45200` | `45.20s` | `45.2s` |
| `999.6` | `1.00s` | `1s` |
| `999.5` | `1.00s` | `1s` |
| `59999` | `1m 0.00s` | `1m 0s` |
| `59995` | `1m 0.00s` | `1m 0s` |
| `119999` | `2m 0.00s` | `2m 0s` |
| `3659999` | `1h 1m 0.00s` | `1h 1m 0s` |
| `86459999` | `1d 1m 0.00s` | `1d 1m 0s` |
The root `vitest.config.ts` uses default include globs, so `test/*.test.ts` runs and these assertions fail, breaking CI. (I couldn't run vitest directly in the sandbox because dev deps weren't installed / `vitest/config` unresolved, so I reproduced the exact function logic in a standalone Node script to confirm the outputs.)
## Fix
Updated the stale assertions in `test/format-duration-precise.test.ts` to the trimmed-zero outputs, and adjusted the file-level doc comment (which referenced `"1m 0.00s"` / `"60.00s"`) to describe the current behavior.
Co-authored-by: Vercel <vercel[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mitul-s <mitulxshah@gmail.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: vercel[bot] <35613825+vercel[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vercel <vercel[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>