<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows the docs guidelines: https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
i got bit by this often :p
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows the docs guidelines: https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
This adds a shared routing package which can be used to resolve routes
provided from the adapter API to the final output that should be
served/invoked. It aims to handle all the routing done in `next-server`
and allows a simplified interface for invoking the middleware output
however that is deployed.
---------
Co-authored-by: vercel[bot] <35613825+vercel[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Previously, rspack test runs were writing to `test-junit-report`, but
were expected to be found at `turbopack-test-junit-report`.
This renames both sides to be `rspack-test-junit-report`.
### What?
Adds the name of the test that's running when the browser is started to
the recording.
Also makes `RECORD_REPLAY=1` work without `run-tests.js`
Closes PACK-2206
### What?
Switch the default for `--turbo` to the new `--experimental-turbo`, remove the old code in next.js
### Why?
The new approach will be used in future
Closes WEB-1506
### 🧐 What's in there?
As discussed with @huozhi, it's restoring code from #52393 which I forgot to restore in #54891.
It is unlikely to make a difference, but we'll set globalWindow based on the desired test environment. This will not make any difference for most people.
### 🧪 How to test?
Once you've rebuilt your local version of Next, `pnpm testheadless jest/rsc`
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
### What
Pairing PR to https://github.com/vercel/turbo/pull/5714, which I believe last piece to reenable correct datadog test reports for daily next.js integration + turbopack.
1. Creates a unique suite name to avoid collision / merging across different env / grouped test run
2. revert suitename template (which is for _suites_, not _suite_ for top level) as 1 resolves uniqueness
### What?
this forces all tests to use turbopack independent of the way they invoke next dev
### Why?
some tests were not running turbopack
fixes WEB-1187
### What?
WEB-1150.
This PR is an attempt to upload next.js's test results into datadog test trace to track its status.
Originally it tried to use automatic trace injection (dd-trace/ci/init). However, due to some of custom environments / setup we use it was not compatible out of the box. Instead, this PR injects a new test reportert to generate junit report, then upload it at once at the end of the testing pipeline.
The reporter is configured to run when necessary variables set, local run should not be affected.
One thing to note is this report will not count retry results, as it'll create duplicated test entry with multiple results since we runts jest per individual test. This'll allow to detect flaky test easier, but also it means we'll get bit of skewed test results compare to the real world as first failure will be accounted as test fail immediately.
Refactor the logic of picking the font file to use for the font fallback
generation. Add additional tests that checks that the correct font file
is picked. Also adds more comments explaining the logic and assumptions
behind the functions.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Mock `@next/font` when using `next/jest`.
fixes#42379
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This PR adds a new `experimental.enableUndici` option to let the
developer switch from `next-fetch` to `undici` as the underlying
polyfill for `fetch` in Node.js.
In the current implementation, Next.js makes sure that `fetch` is always
available by using `node-fetch`. However, we do not polyfill in Node.js
18+, since those versions come with their own `fetch` implementation
already, built-in.
Node.js 18+ uses `undici` under the hood, so letting the developer use
`undici` earlier could make the migration easier later on.
Eventually, we hope to be able to stop polyfilling `fetch` in an
upcoming major version of Next.js, shipping less code.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
Co-authored-by: Sukka <isukkaw@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
* Move unit tests to one folder
* Migrate unit tests to TypeScript
* add test types to lint
* Ensure ts(x) tests are run with util
* Add tsx extension to jest config
* bump
This updates our `jest` configuration to no longer use `babel-jest` and instead uses `@swc/jest` which is much faster. This also updates to the latest version of `jest`, fixes our `tsconfig.json` used for tests (previously types in `node_modules` weren't resolved correctly), and ensures `next/dist` isn't un-necessarily transpiled in `jest`.
Timings for `yarn testheadless test/unit/` on CI
- before: 3m 30s - 4m ([example run](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/runs/3394701995))
- after: under 1m ([example run](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/28400/checks?check_run_id=3395161621))
Timings for `yarn testheadless test/unit/` locally on m1 mac
- before: 90.16 seconds
- after: 29.92 seconds
This PR upgrades `jest-worker` and `jest-cli` to the latest pre-release version, also removed `jest-circus` which is included in Jest by default. `jest-worker@next` includes a fix for memory leak that we need (https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/11187).
Fixes#22925. This will also improve the OOM issue for `next dev` #15855.
Update tests to setup webdriver stuff in `jest-environment` and re-use one browser session instead of spawning one for each webdriver call to prevent creating too many BrowserStack sessions.
- [x] Move jest config from npm scripts to `jest.config.js`
- [x] Remove obsolete cross-env package (we don't need it anymore 🎉)
- [x] Fix bug where tests are not waiting for webdriver to be ready.
Niklas Mischkulnig
