Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Currently there's a bug when selecting Chinese, Japanese or Korean (CJK)
as subsets.
```js
const notoSans = Noto_Sans_JP({
subsets: ['japanese'],
})
```
It actually doesn't work, nothing preloads. This PR solves this by
removing CJK languages as candidates for preloading. The reason is that
they contain so many glyphs that each font-family is split up in 100+
font files. It doesn't make sense to preload all of them.
So CJK users will have to disable preloading.
```js
const notoSansJapanese = Noto_Sans_JP({
weight: '400',
preload: false,
})
```
In case you do manually disable preloading like above, the default
`font-display` is changed to `swap`.
This PR also improves the validation errors of subsets.
1. Providing unknown subset
```
`@next/font` error:
Unknown subset `japanese` for font `Inter`.
Available subsets: `cyrillic`, `cyrillic-ext`, `greek`, `greek-ext`, `latin`, `latin-ext`, `vietnamese`
```
2. Missing specified subset. The error has a link with further
instructions.
```
`@next/font` error:
Missing selected subsets for font `Inter`. Please specify subsets in the function call or in your `next.config.js`. Read more: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/google-fonts-missing-subsets
```
fixes NEXT-336
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
### Description
* Gives us [Vercel] more SEO juice rather than GitHub.
* Gives us the freedom to control GitHub repo file structure independent from URLs.
## Feature
- [x] Documentation added
Similar to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/42106. Make
`@next/font` works as expected when using `transpilePackages`.
Also makes sure `@next/font` is auto-configured correctly when in a
monorepo.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
After speaking with @timneutkens, this PR provides a smoother experience to users trying to migrate over to app without affecting users in pages.
This PR adds a new export available from `next/compat/router` that exposes a `useRouter()` hook that can be used in both `app/` and `pages/`. It differs from `next/router` in that it does not throw an error when the pages router is not mounted, and instead has a return type of `NextRouter | null`. This allows developers to convert components to support running in both `app/` and `pages/` as they are transitioning over to `app/`.
A component that before looked like this:
```tsx
import { useRouter } from 'next/router';
const MyComponent = () => {
const { isReady, query } = useRouter();
// ...
};
```
Will error when converted over to `next/compat/router`, as `null` cannot be destructured. Instead, developers will be able to take advantage of new hooks:
```tsx
import { useEffect } from 'react';
import { useRouter } from 'next/compat/router';
import { useSearchParams } from 'next/navigation';
const MyComponent = () => {
const router = useRouter() // may be null or a NextRouter instance
const searchParams = useSearchParams()
useEffect(() => {
if (router && !router.isReady) {
return
}
// In `app/`, searchParams will be ready immediately with the values, in
// `pages/` it will be available after the router is ready.
const search = searchParams.get('search')
// ...
}, [router, searchParams])
// ...
}
```
This component will now work in both `pages/` and `app/`. When the component is no longer used in `pages/`, you can remove the references to the compat router:
```tsx
import { useSearchParams } from 'next/navigation';
const MyComponent = () => {
const searchParams = useSearchParams()
// As this component is only used in `app/`, the compat router can be removed.
const search = searchParams.get('search')
// ...
}
```
Note that as of Next.js 13, calling `useRouter` from `next/router` will throw an error when not mounted. This now includes an error page that can be used to assist developers.
We hope to introduce a codemod that can convert instances of your `useRouter` from `next/router` to `next/compat/router` in the future.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Updated minimum React version to match information at https://nextjs.org/blog/next-13. This page is the first Google result for "next.js 13 react 17" and the info in it is out of data after Next.js 13 was released.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [x] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Adds an error that was missing. Link to beta until the changes are live.
closes#41900
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This PR adds a new configure property, `images.loaderFile` that allow
you to define a path to a file with an exported image loader function.
This is useful when migrating from `next/legacy/image` to `next/image`
because it lets you configure the loader for every instance of
`next/image` once, similar to the legacy "built-in loaders".
The `target: serverless` config was deprecated a year ago starting in
[Next.js 12](https://nextjs.org/blog/next-12).
Tests were disabled in #41252 so we can now remove `target: serverless`
and all usage of `target` in `next.config.js`.
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
## 🐛 What's in there?
`foo instanceof Function` is wrongly considered as Dynamic code evaluation by our static analyzer.
This PR fixes it.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## 🧪 How to reproduce?
1. Create a simple repro in `examples` folder:
```js
// examples/instance-of-function/pages/index.js
export default function Home() {
return <h1>home</h1>
}
// examples/instance-of-function/middleware.js
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
export default async function handler() {
console.log('is arrow a function?', (() => {}) instanceof Function)
return NextResponse.next()
}
```
1. build with next `pnpm next build examples/instance-of-function`
> the build fails
1. rebuild next to include PR's fix `pnpm build`
1. build with new next `pnpm next build examples/instance-of-function`
> the build works
## 📔 Notes to reviewers
`hooks.expression.for(`${prefix}Function`).tap(NAME, handleExpression)` is actually legacy code from the original implementation. It's used when finding `Function` regardless of how it is used. We only want to find `new Function()` or `Function()`, which `hooks.calls` and `hooks.new` are covering.
`eval instanceof Function` is perfectly legit code on the edge, despite its uselessness :lol-think:
Because we got multiple people asking "how do I relax this error when my code contains unreachable dynamic code evaluation", I've copy-pasted details about `config.unstable_allowDynamic` into the error page. Because users do not always click links :blob_shrug:
Adds build error when using font loaders with babel. Otherwise you'll
get other unrelated errors.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Partially addresses #41111
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
I had the same issue, so the fix that worked for me was pulled from this
thread https://stackoverflow.com/a/71870995
I have been experiencing the same problem lately with NextJS and i am
not sure if my observations are applicable to other libraries. I had
been wrapping my components with an improper tag that is, NextJS is not
comfortable having a p tag wrapping your divs, sections etc so it will
yell "Hydration failed because the initial UI does not match what was
rendered on the server". So I solved this problem by examining how my
elements were wrapping each other. With material UI you would need to be
cautious for example if you use a Typography component as a wrapper, the
default value of the component prop is "p" so you will experience the
error if you don't change the component value to something semantic. So
in my own opinion based on my personal experience the problem is caused
by improper arrangement of html elements and to solve the problem in the
context of NextJS one will have to reevaluate how they are arranging
their html element
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Continues #39778Closes#40499
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
In order to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we
request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
## Summary
This PR adds a note about how to see the data that this error is complaining about:
```sh
Warning: data for page "/" is xxx which exceeds the threshold of 128 kB, this amount of data can reduce performance.
```
This debug trick was something I came across in a [discussion](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/39880) and I thought it would be helpful to others like it was for me.
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
### 📖 What's in there?
Dynamic code evaluation (`eval()`, `new Function()`, ...) is not
supported on the edge runtime, hence why we fail the build when
detecting such statement in the middleware or `experimental-edge` routes
at build time.
However, there could be false positives, which static analysis and
tree-shaking can not exclude:
- `qs` through these dependencies (get-intrinsic:
[source](https://github.com/ljharb/get-intrinsic/blob/main/index.js#L12))
- `function-bind`
([source](https://github.com/Raynos/function-bind/blob/master/implementation.js#L42))
- `has`
([source](https://github.com/tarruda/has/blob/master/src/index.js#L5))
This PR leverages the existing `config` export to let user allow some of
their files.
it’s meant for allowing users to import 3rd party modules who embed
dynamic code evaluation, but do not use it (because or code paths), and
can't be tree-shaked.
By default, it’s keeping the existing behavior: warn in dev, fails to
build.
If users allow dynamic code, and that code is reached at runtime, their
app stills breaks.
### 🧪 How to test?
- (existing) integration tests for disallowing dynamic code evaluation:
`pnpm testheadless --testPathPattern=runtime-dynamic`
- (new) integration tests for allowing dynamic code evaluation: `pnpm
testheadless --testPathPattern=runtime-configurable`
- (amended) production tests for validating the new configuration keys:
`pnpm testheadless --testPathPattern=config-validations`
To try it live, you could have an application such as:
```js
// lib/index.js
/* eslint-disable no-eval */
export function hasUnusedDynamic() {
if ((() => false)()) {
eval('100')
}
}
export function hasDynamic() {
eval('100')
}
// pages/index.jsx
export default function Page({ edgeRoute }) {
return <p>{edgeRoute}</p>
}
export const getServerSideProps = async (req) => {
const res = await fetch(`http://localhost:3000/api/route`)
const data = await res.json()
return { props: { edgeRoute: data.ok ? `Hi from the edge route` : '' } }
}
// pages/api/route.js
import { hasDynamic } from '../../lib'
export default async function handle() {
hasDynamic()
return Response.json({ ok: true })
}
export const config = {
runtime: 'experimental-edge' ,
allowDynamic: '/lib/**'
}
```
Playing with `config.allowDynamic`, you should be able to:
- build the app even if it uses `eval()` (it will obviously fail at
runtime)
- build the app that _imports but does not use_ `eval()`
- run the app in dev, even if it uses `eval()` with no warning
### 🆙 Notes to reviewers
Before adding documentation and telemetry, I'd like to collect comments
on a couple of points:
- the overall design for this feature: is a list of globs useful and
easy enough?
- should the globs be relative to the application root (current
implementation) to to the edge route/middleware file?
- (especially to @sokra) is the implementation idiomatic enough? I've
leverage loaders to read the _entry point_ configuration once, then the
ModuleGraph to get it back during the parsing phase. I couldn't re-use
the existing `getExtractMetadata()` facility since it's happening late
after the parsing.
- there's a glitch with `import { ServerRuntime } from '../../types'` in
`get-page-static-info.ts`
([here](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/39539/files#diff-cb7ac6392c3dd707c5edab159c3144ec114eafea92dad5d98f4eedfc612174d2L12)).
I had to use `next/types` because it was failing during lint. Any clue
why?
### ☑️ Checklist
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [x] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
In order to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we
request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
This serves to add support for [Subresource
Integrity](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Subresource_Integrity)
hashes for scripts added from the new app directory. This also has
support for utilizing nonce values passed from request headers (expected
to be generated per request in middleware) in the bootstrapping scripts
via the `Content-Security-Policy` header as such:
```
Content-Security-Policy: script-src 'nonce-2726c7f26c'
```
Which results in the inline scripts having a new `nonce` attribute hash
added. These features combined support for setting an aggressive Content
Security Policy on scripts loaded.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
This PR updates a few features from experimental to stable status:
- `next/future/image` component
- `remotePatterns` configuration
- `unoptimized` configuration
Currently, `next/dynamic` will opt-in to `React.lazy` if `{ suspense: true }` is used. And React 18 will always resolve the `Suspense` boundary on the server-side, effectively ignoring the `ssr` option.
The PR fixes#39609 by showing a warning message when `{ suspense: true, ssr: false }` is detected. The error documentation and the corresponding test case has also been updated.
In the future, Next.js could implement a custom version of `React.lazy` that could suspense without executing the lazy-loaded component on the server-side.
cc @huozhi
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
* fix internal type
* allow `void` to be returned from Middleware
* mark deprecated APIs in JSDoc
* fix typo
* add missing error page
* remove unused import
Hannes Bornö
