0b58a32c45
[test] assert* -> waitFor* when the util is not instant ( #85450 )
2025-10-30 14:44:08 +01:00
2e97a73de6
use explicit resource management for sandbox ( #72780 )
...
Migrated every instance of `sandbox` to use the `using` keyword so that
the `cleanup` will be automatically performed when the execution leaves
the scope.
2024-11-14 06:53:25 -05:00
fe8d953e2d
Replace hasRedbox() ( #67025 )
...
...with `assertHasRedbox` and `assertNoRedbox`.
`hasRedbox()` has a hardcoded timeout of 5s that is only required for
the negative assertion.
Instead, we now have dedicated assertions for the positive
(`assertHasRedbox`) and negative case (`assertNoRedbox`).
The negative assertion still has the hardcoded timeout.
But the positive assertion just retries until we find the Redbox.
This speeds up tests using the positive assertion.
Removing `hasRedbox` also uncovered some unused expressions e.g. `await
hasRedbox(browser)`.
These expressions probably wanted to use `expect(await
hasRedbox(browser)).toBe(true)
2024-06-20 10:37:32 +02:00
f687ac9f84
Fix ReactRefreshModule test in Turbopack ( #61049 )
...
## What?
Ensures the import is not tree shaken, similar to the changes for the
App Router version of this test in #60522
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas )
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs )
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Closes NEXT-2201
2024-01-23 16:08:58 -08:00
e169e73b45
Add hasRedbox fix ( #60522 )
...
## What?
As @leerob and I found in-person when opening #57230 the `hasRedBox()`
helper was incorrectly passing when it shouldn't pass in both the true
and false case.
This PR uses a different approach by waiting 7 seconds before checking,
this leaves enough room for HMR / reloads to apply, it doesn't
meaningfully slow down the test suite and increases reliability of the
check as you can see below in the tests that were previously passing
that are no longer passing.
I've moved these to skipped tests for landing this PR as I want to avoid
further issues being introduced while we fix them. @huozhi will
investigate these next week 👍
Failing tests that are temporarily skipped:
-
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-513b477050bf1a620697b4d16bc1e6850282cb54e0609bdc5fd34307bfa9e471R9
-
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-fa7d7c8c40914005c138d852eaf6a69ac0df51ec77bec548cbc5f0bfbdc8ebc5R25
-
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-6f9f7dc131416cb17938311939a56d8c0e685a8fe6e8fc0cf5cd04939c74f388R41
-
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-439830e340a320c56645e9d00aaf0fd0b492ddb90b6d7f9db89458ccc5158eb7R8
-
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-62938bf5cd4d84f96dde8b6bcb2c8e18099e6dfca269c4302229b79175c0250cR18
-
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-513b477050bf1a620697b4d16bc1e6850282cb54e0609bdc5fd34307bfa9e471R9
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas )
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs )
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Closes NEXT-2059
2024-01-15 09:36:44 +01:00
c1c3675fc4
refactor tests for readability ( #51051 )
...
You'll probably want to disable whitespace in the diff
## Description
This allows for better editor support by using `describe` or functions called `describe` with the same syntax instead of custom names.
Changes:
- `nextTestSetup` can be used instead of `createNextDescribe` keeping the same behaviour but being called inside a `describe` "block" (not applied everywhere)
- `getSnapshotTestDescribe` replaced with a custom `describe.each`
- `sandbox` helper function for `acceptance`/`acceptance-app` merged into a single shared one
- `outdent` to remove the indent from inline files in tests which helps with consistent snapshots
2023-06-21 19:47:21 +00:00
034ee8ac8b
Update some flakey acceptance tests ( #44984 )
2023-01-17 13:14:43 -08:00
7e95e30063
fix: allow certain variable names in development ( #33638 )
...
Fixes #24570
A few variable names (listed https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/24570#issuecomment-828721019 ) were causing problems when using `next dev`.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
2022-01-27 14:22:35 +00:00
Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann