### Summary
Fixes#52935
`next/script` has a `Script` component that supports an `async` prop.
However, when scripts are loaded with the `async` prop set to false, the
script is loaded as if async was set to true. This may cause scripts to
execute out of order. Repro:
https://github.com/domdomegg/next-async-script-reproduction
I think this is occurring because Next uses setAttribute to set the
async and defer attributes. However, this is not a valid way to set
these properties on a script. This is because . Demo:
https://jsfiddle.net/6ktpfae1/
This PR fixes this behaviour by using removeAttribute after calling
setAttribute (rather than using setAttribute "false"). This appears to
result in correct behaviour.
Given it appears this workaround was already applied in `next/head`,
I've harmonised the code between these two.
### Next steps
I think this PR is ready for review. I acknowledge there are no test
changes, but there are no existing tests for `next/script` at all and
creating them I think would be disproportionally difficult given issues
in #52943.
---------
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
Co-authored-by: Sam Ko <sam@vercel.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
## Why?
For multi-root layouts (route groups on the root with their root
layouts, no layout file on the root), it is not possible to use global
`not-found` since the `layout` is missing on the root.
```sh
.
└── app/
├── (main)/
│ └── layout.js
├── (sub)/
│ └── layout.js
└── not-found.js --> ERR: missing layout
```
Current Behavior:
```sh
not-found.js doesn't have a root layout. To fix this error, make sure every page has a root layout.
```
## What?
Let multi-root layouts also benefit from the global `not-found`.
## How?
Wrap root `not-found` with default layout if root layout does not exist.
Although this solution is not `multi-root` specific, it won't produce
critical issues since a root `layout` is required for other cases.
Fixes#55191#54980#59180
### What
Inherit the client boudaries from the found matched target in load
barrel
### Why
The root cause with the barrel transform, we missed the client boundary
directive during the transform.
Since the new version of mui's case looks like this:
Import path
page.js (server module) -> `<module>/index.js` (shared module) ->
`<module/subpath>/index.js` (client module) ->
`<module/subpath/sub-module.js> (client module)
After our transform, we lost the `"use client"` which causes the
mismatch of the transform:
In `rsc` layer: the file pointing to the sub module entry
(`<module/subpath>/index.js`), but without the client boundary.
Fixes#64369
Closes NEXT-3101
### What
CSS imports in components that loaded by `next/dynamic` in client
components will cause the css are missing initial in
SSR, and loaded later on client side which will lead to FOUC. This PR
fixes the issue and get CSS preloaded in the SSR for dynamic components.
### Why
The CSS from client components that created through `next/dynamic` are
not collected in the SSR, unlike RSC rendering we already collect the
CSS resources for each entry so we included them in the server rendering
so the styles are availble at that time. But for client components, we
didn't traverse all the client components and collect the CSS resources.
In pages router we kinda collect all the dynamic imports and preload
them during SSR, but this approach is not able to be applied to app
router due to different architecture. Since we already have all the
dynamic imports info and their related chunks in
react-loadable-manifest, so we can do the similar "preloading" thing in
app router. We use the current dynamic module key (`app/page.js ->
../components/foo.js`) which created by SWC transform and match it in
the react loadable manifest that accessed from `AsyncLocalStorage`, to
get the css files created by webpack then render them as preload
styleshee links. In this way we can SSR all the related CSS resources
for dynamic client components.
The reason we pass down the react loadable manifest through
`AsyncLocalStorage` is that it's sort of exclude the manifest from RSC
payload as it's not required for hydration, but only required for SSR.
Note: this issue only occurred in dynamic rendering case for client
components.
### Other Changes Overview
- Change the react loadable manifest key from pages dir based relative
path to a source dir based relative path, to support cases with both
directory or only one of them
Closes NEXT-2578
Fixes#61212Fixes#61111Fixes#62940
Replacement for #64021 but only with production test
### What
We introduced a new algorithm to find the matched hydration error tags,
when there're two tags indicating children and parent as bad descendence
relationship. Now we search for the child first from the last index, and
then from found child to search its above parent. This way we can find
the two related tags in O(1), since they could be not directly nested.
### Why
When a hydration error occurred, such as bad nesting `div` under `p`,
one of the tag `div` is matched multiple times in the component stack,
it shouldn't be highlighted multiple times. This PR fixes the bad
matching about multiple nested tags, e.g. when there're many `div` tag
and `div` is one of the bad tag, only the one directly under p should be
highlited.
Case
```
Page > div > div > p > div
```
Current Result: all `div` and `p` get highlighted, `[]` represents
highlighted.
```
Page > [div] > [div] > [p] > [div]
```
Expected: only the related 2 tags are highlighted, `[]` represents
highlighted.
```
Page > div > div > [p] > [div]
```
Thanks @JohnPhamous for reporting the issue
Closes NEXT-3022
Closes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/63623
When a relative assetPrefix was set (e.g. `/custom-asset-prefix`),
bundle fetching would always return a 404 as the assetPrefix was not
removed from filesystem path
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
### What?
Pass the names of side-effect-free packages specified in `experimental.optimizePackageImports`.
Turbopack counterpart: https://github.com/vercel/turbo/pull/7731
### Why?
Some packages like `@tremor/react` causes a problem without `optimizePackageImports`.
### How?
Closes PACK-2527
This causes Turbopack to fail and communicate when a file with an
unhandled or unregistered extension is built.
Test Plan: `TURBOPACK=1 pnpm test-dev
test/development/basic/hmr.test.ts`
Closes PACK-2803
This records dedicated snapshots for Turbopack for the remaining tests
in `test/development/acceptance/error-recovery.test.ts`. The only
remaining difference was the lack of Import trace information.
Test Plan: `TURBOPACK=1 pnpm test-dev
test/development/acceptance/error-recovery.test.ts`
Closes PACK-2761
script tag cannot be placed under html directly, users reported a case
in #51242 that having `<Script>` under html will cause hydration error,
this will display the React hydration error related warning of bad usage
for it.
You will see this warning in dev overlay instead of displaying nothing
```
In HTML, <script> cannot be a child of <html>.
This will cause a hydration error.
```
Added two other react warnings detection patterns as well
* `Warning: In HTML, text nodes cannot be a child of <%s>.\nThis will
cause a hydration error.',`
* `Warning: In HTML, whitespace text nodes cann...`
But tested they're not generating hydration errors, only warnings in
console, so we don't need to have tests for them.
Closes NEXT-2835
### What
Use SWC to check invalid client hooks of `next/navigation` imports in
server components.
Follow up of #62456
Remove the runtime error APIs for `next/navigation` rsc version.
Add `next/navigation` react-server version alias in turbopack.
This PR also refactored the invalid server layer APIs detection into a
map, where key is import path and value is an array of client APIs.
During the traversing we will get the import source easily, this makes
extending the logic much easier
### Why
Previously we're using the runtime error to check it, but it has to run
first then the error will be thrown. If we error first in build time
with this check it's much faster and we this align on both side between
webpack and turbopack.
### What
This PR completes resolve plugin for the invalid import assertion, for
the server-only in client component + styld-jsx in server components.
Closes PACK-2707
## What?
Follow-up to #63128
`JSON.stringify(undefined)` ends up with the value `undefined`. However
for Webpack/Turbopack to correctly inject `undefined` into the code it
has to be the string `'undefined'`. This change ensures the
serialization takes into account that case.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Closes NEXT-2773
The "Compiled" HMR log is emitted as follows:
> Compiled in 54ms
When running this string through the matcher, we get:
```
> const matches = "Compiled in 54ms".match(/Compiled.*? in ([\d.]{1,})\s?(?:s|ms)/i)
console.log(matches[1]); // 54
```
We correctly assign `compileTime` to `matches[1]`. However, we then
assign `compileTimeMs` to `parseFloat(compileTime[1])`. This is
definitely an error, as `compileTime[1]` would be `4` in the above
example.
This means that if the compilation time takes less than a single digit
value, it'd be coerced to NaN.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Closes NEXT-2757
### What
* Move missing html tags error into error overlay, from outside we don't
have to manually determine when to render a dummy component with runtime
missing tag error or error overlay.
* Add brackets `<>` to the html tags in the error
### Why
In #62815, we're having throwing an missing required error, this will
trigger another runtime error. Then when error overlay caught it through
error event listener, it will render it as an unhandled runtime error:
You will see the below message in the overlay.
```
Unhandled Runtime Error
Error: The following tas are missing...
[Error stack]
```
This error message will bring a message that the error is happened on
client during runtime, but actually we already know that is a user side
mistake which doesn't have a error trace. This couldn't hmr as you fix
the error as well.
This PR moves the rendering into error overlay that we're aware of the
errors and can render the correct html on client, with the `html` tag
attached with error id and `body` wrapping the error overlay. We tell
overlay that there're missing tags through props, let it handle
everything inside.
It can also hmr once you fix the error. One drawback is that when you
re-introduce the error, it might trigger react DOM updates exception
(`Failed to execute 'removeChild' on 'Node': The node to be removed is
not a child of this node.`) instead of the "missing tags" message again.
Besides that the HMR works properly.
Closes NEXT-2741
Similar to #62611, this implements error stack translation for edge
runtime app render errors.
Test Plan: `TURBOPACK=1 pnpm test-dev
test/development/app-render-error-log/app-render-error-log.test.ts`
Closes PACK-2665
Previously, errors shown in the error overlay, these stir were left
untraced through source maps.
Test Plan: `TURBOPACK=1 pnpm test-dev
test/development/app-render-error-log/app-render-error-log.test.ts`
Closes PACK-2608
### What
Keep improving the hydration erros. Currently we divide the hydration
mismatch types into two categories, html tag mismatch and text mismatch.
We're displaying the mismatched text content between server and client
here since we have it in the component stack and warnings.
We've already made some improvements in #62590 , here we carry on
improving the highlited text into red and bold that is much easier for
you to spot on.
This updated a few long snapshots that we could collapse and show only
the text content difference instead of all the component stack.
### Screenshots
(Dark and light modes)
#### Mismatch html tags
<img width="360"
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/4800338/f721b374-69cc-4600-a09d-bef87e885fab"><img
width="360"
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/4800338/1abf2572-2be8-4359-a652-8ba39aaccfd3">
#### Mismatch text content
<img width="360"
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/4800338/7f0d2215-8bc0-4fba-9c92-6c44efa29531"><img
width="360"
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/4800338/656d1e1a-3157-4bcf-a239-74bb81fcb4c4">
#### Large content mismatch
### Why
I was intended to bring a html diff between server and client html
content but turns out the diff result could be giant and not ideal due
to few reasons. So we switched to the path of leveraging component stack
and mismatch contents.
React reordering the tags after hydration. For instance the `script` or
`link` tags could be hoist by React Float, so the lines of html is are
to preserved. so the diff is hard to be super accurate unless your
mismatch is small. If you're mismatch a component with rich html
content, it could be a pretty large diff.
Another case is if you have a bad nesting html like `<p> ...<span>...
<p>my text</p> ...</span>... <p>` where there're many span in between,
the final different could also be hudge as browser will close the first
`<p>` tag and the rest content will go into the diff. Hence we're going
with the component and text content diff.
Closes NEXT-2645
### What?
We now keep track of all client assets emitted for each route in
`ClientAssetMapper` and remove all issues associated with them when a
route get deleted.
Fixes#61384
Closes PACK-2487
## What?
#62528 caused test/e2e/app-dir/not-found/conflict-route to fail
compilation in Turbopack, this compiler error was previously already
reported by Turbopack but Next.js didn't show it, which #62528 resolved.
This PR changes the handling for the not-found handling to be consistent
between development and build, which ensures that the "special" page no
longer conflicts with app/not-found/page.js.
Closes NEXT-2617
Note: this is a reworked iteration of
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/62585 which wasn't sufficient.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Hendrik Liebau