## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Added () outside *demo"
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Changed - function component to - functional component in the heading and sentence below:
If the child of `Link` is a functional component, in addition to using `passHref`, you must wrap the component
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
I found that an example for a redirect rule in the documentation doesn't have the required property `permanent`. I noticed this because I tried to use that same rule but building fails with the following message:
```
`permanent` is not set to `true` or `false` for route {"source":"/:path((?!another-page$).*)","has":[{"type":"host","value":"example.com"}],"destination":"/another-page"}
Error: Invalid redirect found
```
My PR simply adds the missing `permanent` property as false to be consistent with the rest.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
In talking to partners, I've seen a lot of confusion about the number of wrapping `<div>`s around the image element rendered by `next/image`. There's always just one single wrapper--this PR updates the docs to make that a little more explicit.
Current docs on exposing environment variables to the browser are slightly misleading as they say that variables loaded from `.env.local` are only available in node by default, but this is the case for all environment variables not just those loaded from `.env.local`.
## Documentation
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
Previous to this change, getServerSideProps could only return plain objects
for props, e.g.:
```javascript
export async function getServerSideProps() {
return {
props: {
text: 'some value',
}
}
}
```
With this commit, the props object can also be a Promise, e.g.
```javascript
export async function getServerSideProps() {
return {
props: (async function () {
return {
text: 'promise value',
}
})(),
}
}
```
For now, the framework simply waits for the results of the props Promise to resolve,
but this small change sets the groundwork for later allowing props to be streamed (cc @devknoll).
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. -- *This is part of @devknoll's ongoing work to support streaming.*
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. *not sure if this applies here*
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
"exclusive of" implies that it doesn't pertain to `export` https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exclusive%20of "Exclusive to" implies that it's only relevant to `export`.
Also changed "can not" to "cannot".
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
This PR updates the with-jest example to the latest version of Jest and adds a note about the Jest and RTL testing environments (related to this [discussion](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/28337)). Also adds minor tweaks to the testing docs.
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
* Use recommended pattern in testing example
Since the official linter for testing library, `eslint-plugin-testing-library` recommends using `screen` to write queries, this MR updates the testing library example to follow the pattern recommended by the linter.
> DOM Testing Library (and other Testing Library frameworks built on top of it) exports a screen object which has every query (and a debug method). This works better with autocomplete and makes each test a little simpler to write and maintain.
> This rule aims to force writing tests using built-in queries directly from screen object rather than destructuring them from render result. Given the screen component does not expose utility methods such as rerender() or the container property, it is correct to use the render returned value in those scenarios.
See the `prefer-screen-queries` rules docs for more info: https://github.com/testing-library/eslint-plugin-testing-library/blob/main/docs/rules/prefer-screen-queries.md
* Update devDependencies
* Install and configure test linting
* Use recommended pattern in test
* Update test names for consistency
* Update docs
* Set jest environment in each file
* Use root true in `with-jest` eslint config
* Ensure nested .eslintrcs are not loaded for repo lint
Co-authored-by: jj@jjsweb.site <jj@jjsweb.site>
There's been community feedback the `layouts` section of `next/image` docs could be improved. Thanks to this great article (https://blog.eyas.sh/2021/08/gatsby-to-next-js/), I've added a helpful table here giving a high-level overview, as well as re-organized the `layout` section to be more helpful.
Adding display property to the examples as just copying them shows a 'Display parameter is missing.' warning.
Also added a link to the docs.
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
This adds a new ESLint rule to `eslint-plugin-next` to check that `next/script` components with inline content have the required `id` attribute.
Also adjusted the code example for inline scripts in the `next/script` docs, which were actually missing an `id` attribute.
And also updated the `next/scripts` integration test to also have the required `id` attribute.
Unsure about the required heading levels in the errors .md document (other examples have h1 and h4??)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
This PR adds documentation for the new `rootDir` setting (#27918), and for `next/no-html-link-for-pages`.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md` (for #28165, #27611)
- [x] Update test case
@leerob
This pull request points to our [Cypress GitHub Actions Guide](https://on.cypress.io/github-actions) in the Cypress Documentation site. It contains a guided walkthrough of using GitHub Actions with Cypress in text and our [recently released videos](https://on.cypress.io/ci-gha-playlist) in context.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
Removed "`" with "'".
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
* Add a lint rule for using next script component when using inline script for Google Analytics.
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
* Update errors/next-script-for-ga.md
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Given the context of the surrounding sentence, I believe the intention here was to use the word `increasing`.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
## Feature
- [x] Documentation added
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
It seems that people currently struggle to style their image: https://twitter.com/achrlswrth/status/1425695122029744128, this clarifies that you can use className to do this (something I just learnt!). At the moment, this is kind of hidden in "other props" I think this makes it more clear for people
Thanks,
Sam
This PR adds a recommendation to test production code with Cypress and re-orders the page information.
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
Add a new doc showing how to configure Jest and Cypress with Next.js
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [X] Documentation updated
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Google has begun using Cumulative Layout Shift as a factor in ranking search results, according to the linked Google docs.
This perhaps will make this page out of sync with other Nextjs docs, but I figure better start somewhere.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Documentation:
- Expands the "Migrating Existing Config" section of ESLint doc to explain in more detail
- Minor changes to the "Ignoring ESLint" doc
Bug fixes:
- Adds `browser` and `node` environments to `eslint-config-next`. Closes#26319
- Fixes `no-document-import` rule. Closes#26159
- Fixes `no-page-custom-font` rule. Closes#26160#26894
This PR introduces an improved developer experience when `next lint` is run for the first time.
### Current behavior
`eslint-config-next` is a required package that must be installed before proceeding with `next lint` or `next build`:
Although this has helped many developers start using the new ESLint config, this has also resulted in a few issues:
- Users are required to install the full config (`eslint-config-next`) even if they do not use it or use the Next.js plugin directly (`eslint-plugin-next`).
- #26348
- There's some confusion on why `eslint-config-next` needs to be installed or how it should be used instead of `eslint-plugin-next`.
- #26574
- #26475
- #26438
### New behavior
Instead of enforcing `eslint-config-next` as a required package, this PR prompts the user by asking what config they would like to start. This happens when `next lint` is run for the first time **and** if no ESLint configuration is detected in the application.
<img src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12476932/124331177-e1668a80-db5c-11eb-8915-38d3dc20f5d4.gif" width="800" />
- The CLI will take care of installing `eslint` or `eslint-config-next` if either is not already installed
- Users now have the option to choose between a strict configuration (`next/core-web-vitals`) or just the base configuration (`next`)
- For users that decide to create their own ESLint configuration, or already have an existing one, **installing `eslint-config-next` will not be a requirement for `next lint` or `next build` to run**. A warning message will just show if the Next.js ESLint plugin is not detected in an ESLint config.
<img width="682" alt="Screen Shot 2021-06-25 at 3 02 12 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12476932/123473329-6cc4a680-d5c6-11eb-9a57-d5c0b89a2732.png">
---
In addition, this PR also:
- Fixes#26348
- Updates documentation to make it more clear what approach to take for new and existing ESLint configurations
For users looking at the api reference for 'next/head' it might be a good idea to let them know that there is the 'next/script' component. Using 'next/script' has a lot of advantages over adding a script tag with 'next/head'
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
volcareso
