* chore(stdlib): add conformance tooling for the skills library
The library had no gate that could express what a valid skill is, so
malformed frontmatter, over-budget files and credential literals went
unnoticed. These scripts define and enforce that contract.
- validate-skills.py: extend with Agent Skills v1.0 conformance -
naming rules and directory agreement, an explicit activation trigger
in the description, canonical layout, the 500-line SKILL.md budget,
relative-link integrity, and two security rules (no unrestricted
Bash(*) grant, no credential literals). Structural checks now read a
skill as a whole so material moved into references/ still counts.
- split-skill-references.py: move the heaviest sections of an oversized
SKILL.md into references/. Verifies line by line that every source
line lands in exactly one output and refuses to write otherwise.
- generate-skill-inventory.py: derive SKILLS_INVENTORY.md and
DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE.md from the tree so they cannot drift.
- generate-skill-catalog.py: index the canonical layout only, count
references/ toward a skill's size, and stop truncating descriptions
at 200 characters - the catalog is the discovery surface and must
carry the activation trigger.
- .gitignore: Python bytecode from these scripts, and local .pcl state.
Reviewed-by: Security Analyst, Compiler Engineer, DevX Engineer
* fix(stdlib): bring all 174 skills to Agent Skills v1.0 conformance
No skill in the library was conformant. 41 of 175 failed the existing
validator outright, and none satisfied the spec. This pass fixes the
tree and records the result. See stdlib/CHANGELOG.md for the per-skill
versioning and migration notes.
BREAKING CHANGE: one skill removed, five moved, seven with a capability
withdrawn. Library version 2.0.0 -> 3.0.0.
Structure
- Convert 71 skills stored as flat files to <category>/<name>/SKILL.md,
the layout the spec requires and the only one able to carry companion
resources.
- Rename 5 directories that disagreed with their declared name:, so
resolution by path and by name stop giving different answers. The
repository docs already referenced the corrected paths.
- Merge the duplicate legal-technology skills into legaltech-expert and
delete legal-tech-expert, carrying over everything the survivor
lacked.
Metadata
- Repair 20 unparseable frontmatters: an H1 preceded the --- block and
the key was skill_id: instead of name:, so any parser reading
frontmatter at offset 0 saw no metadata at all. The objectives,
prerequisites and outcome they carried become real body sections.
- Add the missing version: to 21 skills, fold keywords into tags, move
expertise_level under metadata, and align 10 category: values with
their directory.
Discoverability
- Give all 174 descriptions an explicit "Use when ..." trigger, built
from each skill's own tags and section headings. 152 previously said
only what the skill was about, leaving an agent nothing to match on.
Progressive disclosure
- Split 127 oversized skills, moving bulk material into references/ read
on demand and leaving an index behind. A SKILL.md now averages 277
lines instead of 644 and none exceeds 500. Verified lossless line by
line against the previous revision.
Security
- Withdraw the unrestricted Bash(*) grant from 7 skills; none of the six
non-financial ones contained a single shell command. finance-expert
documents code that charges cards and reads bank accounts, so it now
grants no shell at all.
- Remove credential literals: Stripe keys, two JWT signing keys, an
Express session secret, a Redis password and WiFi credentials, all
inlined in examples. They load from the environment now.
- finance-expert: idempotency keys were documented but absent, so a
retry double-charged; webhook signature failures were not caught, so a
forged event raised uncaught instead of being rejected;
int(amount * 100) truncated fractions of a cent. All fixed, plus a
money-movement guardrails section.
- trading-expert: place_order routed without any pre-trade risk check
although a RiskManager sat unused in the next section. Risk validation
now runs before routing and raises rather than returning a boolean a
caller can ignore; live routing is opt-in.
- Correct an Ansible Vault example that showed plaintext under an
"encrypted" label.
Also fixes 8 broken documentation links and a prematurely closed code
fence in skill-creator-expert that leaked template content into prose.
Per the repository file-organization policy, four stale progress reports
(SKILLS_MANIFEST, COMPLETE_SKILLS_LIBRARY, COMPLETE_LIBRARY_MANIFEST,
PHASE_3_DATA_ANALYTICS) move out of stdlib/ into the gitignored
.roadmap/status/stdlib/; they claimed 31 of 100 skills complete. They
appear here as deletions because .roadmap/ is not tracked.
Reviewed-by: Security Analyst, Language Designer, DevX Engineer,
Documentation Specialist
* fix(skills): resolve standard library skills from their real layout
No stdlib skill was resolvable. SkillResolver looked for
`<stdlibDir>/<name>.md` with stdlibDir defaulting to `stdlib/skills`, a
directory that does not exist, and the path ignored the category level
the library actually uses. The two LSP providers had the same wrong
directory and scanned only one level deep, so neither completion nor
go-to-definition could see a skill either.
- skill-discovery.ts: enumerate skill entry points across the shapes in
use - a flat `<name>.md`, `<name>/SKILL.md`, and
`<category>/<name>/SKILL.md` - while skipping references/, scripts/
and assets/, which hold supporting material rather than entry points.
- skill-resolver.ts: point stdlibDir at `stdlib`, and look the name up
as a directory under any category as well as the two legacy shapes, so
existing custom stdlib directories keep working. The name is used as a
single path segment and rejected if it contains a separator or
traversal, so a reference cannot escape the stdlib root.
- Rewire both LSP providers onto the shared discovery helper.
Tests: 13 new cases covering the layouts, ordering, the references/
exclusion, path-traversal rejection, and an integration test that
resolves real shipped skills by bare name.
Reviewed-by: Compiler Engineer, Runtime Architect, Security Analyst
* feat(stdlib): add 17 skills covering the library's largest gaps
Selection was driven by cross-referencing coverage against observed usage
rather than by intuition: Stack Overflow and GitHub Octoverse data for
which technologies matter, and install rankings on public agent-skill
registries for the shape of skills people actually use.
That comparison found a mismatch of form, not only of coverage. The
most-installed skills in the ecosystem are procedures - tdd, refactoring,
frontend design, browser automation - while all 174 existing skills were
domain knowledge shaped as <domain>-expert. The new workflows/ category
closes that gap and introduces the <activity>-workflow convention.
New category workflows/ (4)
- tdd-workflow, refactoring-workflow, debugging-workflow,
code-review-workflow. code-review-workflow complements rather than
replaces code-review-expert: procedure versus judgement. Merge them if
the split proves confusing in use.
Applied AI (3) - the largest coverage gap
- llm-engineering-expert, rag-expert, agent-engineering-expert.
The library referenced LLMs in tags but covered none of it: pgvector
appeared zero times across 174 skills, LangChain once, MCP twice
despite the repository shipping an MCP integration guide.
Capabilities (2)
- document-processing-expert (PDF, DOCX, XLSX, PPTX in one skill),
browser-automation-expert (a client against third-party sites,
distinct from playwright-expert which tests your own application).
Data (3)
- mysql-expert, the second most used database and previously absent
while rarer stores had skills; analytical-databases-expert;
stream-processing-expert.
Security (3)
- secrets-management-expert, supply-chain-security-expert (OWASP A03
2025), identity-access-expert (OWASP A01).
Interface and meta (2)
- accessibility-expert: design/ held only design-expert, which despite
its name covers software architecture, so WCAG had no home.
- skill-router: find and compose skills across 191, with a
disambiguation table for overlapping pairs.
Grouping by decision context rather than by technology keeps the growth
to 17 skills for roughly 50 topics. Five vector stores live inside
rag-expert; four document formats inside document-processing-expert.
Per-tool depth sits in references/, which the progressive-disclosure work
in 3.0.0 made cheap.
Four further gaps are better served by extending existing skills -
PyTorch and TensorFlow in ml-expert, OpenTelemetry in monitoring-expert,
Pulumi and Crossplane in terraform-expert - and are not in this change.
Library 3.0.0 -> 3.1.0, additive only. Adds the workflows label to the
inventory generator; catalogue, inventory, structure and CHANGELOG
regenerated.
Reviewed-by: Product Strategist, Security Analyst, DevX Engineer,
Documentation Specialist
* fix(test): create test directories with mkdtempSync
CodeQL flagged js/insecure-temporary-file (CWE-377) on both suites.
`join(tmpdir(), <predictable name>)` followed by mkdirSync creates a
world-readable directory at a guessable path, so another local user can
pre-create it or plant a symlink between the name being computed and the
directory being created.
mkdtempSync creates the directory atomically with a random suffix and
0700 permissions, which closes both the disclosure and the race.
One occurrence is new in this branch (skill-discovery); the other
pre-dates it in skill-resolver and is fixed in the same pass rather than
left as a known finding in a file this branch already touches.
5.7 KiB
name, version, description, category, tags, allowed-tools, metadata
| name | version | description | category | tags | allowed-tools | metadata | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| edge-computing-expert | 1.1.0 | Design and implement production-grade edge computing solutions including CDN optimization, fog computing architectures, and distributed edge workloads. Use when the user mentions edge computing, CDN or edge caching, fog computing, MEC, IoT edge workloads, or latency-sensitive distributed deployments. | domains |
|
|
|
Edge Computing Expert
Design and implement production-grade edge computing solutions including CDN optimization, fog computing architectures, and distributed edge workloads.
Learning Objectives
- Master edge computing architectures and patterns
- Implement CDN optimization and caching strategies
- Build fog computing distributed systems
- Deploy edge workloads with container orchestration
- Optimize for ultra-low latency applications
Prerequisites
- Strong understanding of distributed systems
- Knowledge of networking and protocols
- Experience with containers and orchestration
- Familiarity with cloud computing concepts
Core Concepts
Edge Computing Architecture
Computing paradigm that brings data processing closer to data sources (IoT devices, users, sensors) rather than centralized cloud data centers. Reduces latency, bandwidth costs, and enables real-time processing.
Content Delivery Networks (CDN)
Geographically distributed network of proxy servers that cache and deliver content from locations closer to end users. Improves load times, reduces origin server load, and enhances availability.
Fog Computing
Decentralized computing infrastructure where data, compute, storage, and applications are distributed between the data source and the cloud. Extends cloud capabilities to the edge of the network.
Multi-Access Edge Computing (MEC)
Network architecture providing IT and cloud computing capabilities at the edge of mobile networks. Enables ultra-low latency applications by processing data near 5G base stations.
Edge Orchestration
Management and coordination of distributed edge workloads across heterogeneous edge infrastructure. Includes deployment, scaling, monitoring, and failover of edge services.
Best Practices
Edge Architecture Design
- Place edge nodes based on user density and latency requirements
- Implement multi-tier edge hierarchy (device → edge → regional → cloud)
- Design for intermittent connectivity and offline operation
- Use event-driven architectures for asynchronous processing
- Implement circuit breakers and fallback mechanisms
- Distribute workloads based on data locality
- Plan for edge node heterogeneity
CDN Optimization
- Implement intelligent cache warming for popular content
- Use adaptive TTLs based on content access patterns
- Enable compression and content optimization
- Implement stale-while-revalidate patterns
- Use cache keys that include relevant parameters
- Monitor cache hit rates and optimize policies
- Implement origin shielding to protect backend
Performance & Latency
- Measure and optimize for P99 latency, not just average
- Use connection pooling and keep-alive
- Implement request coalescing for cache misses
- Use HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 for multiplexing
- Optimize payload sizes and use efficient formats
- Implement predictive prefetching
- Monitor network conditions and adapt
Security at the Edge
- Implement DDoS protection at edge layers
- Use TLS everywhere, including edge-to-edge
- Validate and sanitize all inputs at edge
- Implement rate limiting and throttling
- Use secure boot and attestation for edge devices
- Encrypt data at rest on edge nodes
- Implement zero-trust network architecture
Anti-Patterns
Common Mistakes
- Centralizing too much logic that should be at edge
- Not handling network partitions gracefully
- Ignoring data consistency challenges
- Over-caching dynamic or personalized content
- Not monitoring edge node health
- Inadequate capacity planning for edge nodes
- Treating edge nodes as simple caches
Design Issues
- Single points of failure in edge architecture
- Not accounting for edge node resource constraints
- Ignoring data sovereignty and regulatory requirements
- Poor cache invalidation strategies
- Not implementing proper observability
- Lack of automated failover mechanisms
- Insufficient testing of edge scenarios
Reference Documentation
Detailed material lives alongside this skill and is read on demand:
- Code Examples — Edge Computing Node Manager, CDN Cache Optimization System
Resources
Edge Platforms & Tools
- AWS Wavelength - 5G edge computing
- Azure Edge Zones - Edge services
- Google Distributed Cloud Edge
- Cloudflare Workers - Serverless edge
- Fastly Compute@Edge
- Section.io - Edge as a Service
- KubeEdge - Kubernetes edge orchestration
CDN Providers
- Cloudflare - Global CDN and edge
- Akamai - Enterprise CDN
- Fastly - Programmable CDN
- AWS CloudFront
- Azure CDN
- Google Cloud CDN
Technologies
- K3s - Lightweight Kubernetes for edge
- EdgeX Foundry - IoT edge framework
- Apache OpenWhisk - Serverless platform
- NGINX - Edge proxy and load balancer
- Envoy Proxy - Service mesh
- Varnish - HTTP cache
Learning Resources
- LF Edge - Linux Foundation edge projects
- Edge Computing Consortium
- ETSI MEC specifications
- State of the Edge Report
- Edge Native Application Principles
- CDN performance optimization guides
Part of the PCL Standard Library - Deploy computing at the edge for ultra-low latency applications.