### What?
Fixes an infinite loop that may occur when invoking the findUp() utility
to search for a file by name and no result is found.
### Why?
If triggered, the infinite loop will hang the entire application. For
example, this occurs when trying to boot Payload from a Cloudflare
Worker, as reported in #12327
### How?
By checking whether it has reached the root directory before analysing
the parent folder
It is a common pattern to dynamically show and validate a select field's
options based on various criteria such as the current user or underlying
document.
Some examples of this might include:
- Restricting options based on a user's role, e.g. admin-only options
- Displaying different options based on the value of another field, e.g.
a city/state selector
While this is already possible to do with a custom `validate` function,
the user can still view and select the forbidden option...unless you
_also_ wired up a custom component.
Now, you can define `filterOptions` on select fields.
This behaves similarly to the existing `filterOptions` property on
relationship and upload fields, except the return value of this function
is simply an array of options, not a query constraint. The result of
this function will determine what is shown to the user and what is
validated on the server.
Here's an example:
```ts
{
name: 'select',
type: 'select',
options: [
{
label: 'One',
value: 'one',
},
{
label: 'Two',
value: 'two',
},
{
label: 'Three',
value: 'three',
},
],
filterOptions: ({ options, data }) =>
data.disallowOption1
? options.filter(
(option) => (typeof option === 'string' ? options : option.value) !== 'one',
)
: options,
}
```
In #12322 we prevented against accidental query preset lockout by
throwing a validation error when the user is going to change the preset
in a way that removes their own access to it. This, however, puts the
responsibility on the user to make the corrections and is an unnecessary
step.
For example, the API currently forbids leaving yourself out of the
`users` array when specifying the `specificUsers` constraint, but when
you encounter this error, have to update the field manually and try
again.
To improve the experience, we now automatically inject the requesting
user onto the `users` array when this constraint is selected. This will
guarantee they have access and prevent an accidental lockout while also
avoiding the API error feedback loop.
<!--
Thank you for the PR! Please go through the checklist below and make
sure you've completed all the steps.
Please review the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
document in this repository if you haven't already.
The following items will ensure that your PR is handled as smoothly as
possible:
- PR Title must follow conventional commits format. For example, `feat:
my new feature`, `fix(plugin-seo): my fix`.
- Minimal description explained as if explained to someone not
immediately familiar with the code.
- Provide before/after screenshots or code diffs if applicable.
- Link any related issues/discussions from GitHub or Discord.
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
-->
### What?
This PR help to fix an issue you'll encounter while running payload in
OpenNext on cloudflare
### Why?
Sending telemetry event will create an infinite loop because it won't be
able to find a `package.json`
### How?
Putting the whole logic of `sendEvent` behind `config.telemetry` allows
to disable it and thus, make it work on cloudflare
See this comment for more info :
https://github.com/opennextjs/opennextjs-cloudflare/issues/263#issuecomment-2851747956
This PR updates `generateFileData` to skip applying `resizeOptions`
after updating an image if `resizeOptions.withoutEnlargement` is `true`
and the original image size is smaller than the dimensions defined in
`resizeOptions`.
This prevents unintended re-resizing of already resized images when
updating or modifying metadata without uploading a new file.
This change ensures that:
- Resizing is skipped if withoutEnlargement: true
- Resizing still occurs if withoutEnlargement: false or unset
This resolves an issue where images were being resized again
unnecessarily when updating an upload.
Fixes#12280
I think it's easier to review this PR commit by commit, so I'll explain
it this way:
## Commits
1. [parallelize eslint script (still showing logs results in
serial)](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/12401/commits/c9ac49c12d1e0990c11dfe0964957c2f842883c1):
Previously, `--concurrency 1` was added to the script to make the logs
more readable. However, turborepo has an option specifically for these
use cases: `--log-order=grouped` runs the tasks in parallel but outputs
them serially. As a result, the lint script is now significantly faster.
2. [run pnpm
lint:fix](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/12401/commits/9c128c276ace129ff83c273167e26f9090b4af34)
The auto-fix was run, which resolved some eslint errors that were
slipped in due to the use of `no-verify`. Most of these were
`perfectionist` fixes (property ordering) and the removal of unnecessary
assertions. Starting with this PR, this won't happen again in the
future, as we'll be verifying the linter in every PR across the entire
codebase (see commit 7).
3. [fix eslint non-autofixable
errors](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/12401/commits/700f412a3348a15d4c2ec8c636a378a269b4f1e3)
All manual errors have been resolved except for the configuration errors
addressed in commit 5. Most were React compiler violations, which have
been disabled and commented out "TODO" for now. There's also an unused
`use no memo` and a couple of `require` errors.
4. [move react-compiler linter to eslint-config
package](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/12401/commits/4f7cb4d63a84be69b2131888bcc090ee04109310)
To simplify the eslint configuration. My concern was that there would be
a performance regression when used in non-react related packages, but
none was experienced. This is probably because it only runs on .tsx
files.
5. [remove redundant eslint config files and fix
allowDefaultProject](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/12401/commits/a94347995a70a0970598dcc73638de4f6f7ca289)
The main feature introduced by `typescript-eslint` v8 was
`projectService`, which automatically searches each file for the closest
`tsconfig`, greatly simplifying configuration in monorepos
([source](https://typescript-eslint.io/blog/announcing-typescript-eslint-v8#project-service)).
Once I moved `projectService` to `packages/eslint-config`, all the other
configuration files could be easily removed.
I confirmed that pnpm lint still works on individual packages.
The other important change was that the pending eslint errors from
commits 2 and 3 were resolved. That is, some files were giving the
error: "[File] was not found by the project service. Consider either
including it in the tsconfig.json or including it in
allowDefaultProject." Below I copy the explanatory comment I left in the
code:
```ts
// This is necessary because `tsconfig.base.json` defines `"rootDir": "${configDir}/src"`,
// And the following files aren't in src because they aren't transpiled.
// This is typescript-eslint's way of adding files that aren't included in tsconfig.
// See: https://typescript-eslint.io/troubleshooting/typed-linting/#i-get-errors-telling-me--was-not-found-by-the-project-service-consider-either-including-it-in-the-tsconfigjson-or-including-it-in-allowdefaultproject
// The best practice is to have a tsconfig.json that covers ALL files and is used for
// typechecking (with noEmit), and a `tsconfig.build.json` that is used for the build
// (or alternatively, swc, tsup or tsdown). That's what we should ideally do, in which case
// this hardcoded list wouldn't be necessary. Note that these files don't currently go
// through ts, only through eslint.
```
6. [Differentiate errors from warnings in VScode ESLint
Rules](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/12401/commits/5914d2f48d00e6d3c9d02ec30e189e87d6071754)
There's no reason to do that. If an eslint rule isn't an error, it
should be disabled or converted to a warning.
7. [Disable skip lint, and lint over the entire repo now that it's
faster](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/12401/commits/e4b28f136008020235a2ad176242484b3cebf814)
The GitHub action linted only the files that had changed in the PR.
While this seems like a good idea, once exceptions were introduced with
[skip lint], they opened the door to propagating more and more errors.
Often, the linter was skipped, not because someone introduced new
errors, but because they were trying to avoid those that had already
crept in, sometimes accidentally introducing new ones.
On the other hand, `pnpm lint` now runs in parallel (commit 1), so it's
not that slow. Additionally, it runs in parallel with other GitHub
actions like e2e tests, which take much longer, so it can't represent a
bottleneck in CI.
8. [fix lint in next
package](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/12401/commits/4506595f916dee368a0a052d4256640f5832f621)
Small fix missing from commit 5
9. [Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into
fix-eslint](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/12401/commits/563d4909c13116b17e70e95d3dae9c3446c4cdb5)
10. [add again eslint.config.js in payload
package](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/12401/commits/78f6ffcae78c8caa5e87e4b36a0d6d1d0bddd65a)
The comment in the code explains it. Basically, after the merge from
main, the payload package runs out of memory when linting, probably
because it grew in recent PRs. That package will sooner or later
collapse for our tooling, so we may have to split it. It's already too
big.
## Future Actions
- Resolve React compiler violations, as mentioned in commit 3.
- Decouple the `tsconfig` used for typechecking and build across the
entire monorepo (as explained in point 5) to ensure ts coverage even for
files that aren't transpiled (such as scripts).
- Remove the few remaining `eslint.config.js`. I had to leave the
`richtext-lexical` and `next` ones for now. They could be moved to the
root config and scoped to their packages, as we do for example with
`templates/vercel-postgres/**`. However, I couldn't get it to work, I
don't know why.
- Make eslint in the test folder usable. Not only are we not linting
`test` in CI, but now the `pnpm eslint .` command is so large that my
computer freezes. If each suite were its own package, this would be
solved, and dynamic codegen + git hooks to modify tsconfig.base.json
wouldn't be necessary
([related](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/11984)).
### What?
Fixes issue with the Payload CLI where environment files were silently
always loaded as if in development mode, even when `NODE_ENV=production`
is explicitly set. Achieved by dynamically checking the enviroment based
on `process.env.NODE_ENV` (defaulting to "development") then passing
that to the underlying library `@next/env`.
### Why?
Previously, the Payload CLI always passed `true` to the `dev` flag of
`loadEnvConfig` from `@next/env`, causing it to load
development-specific `.env` files even when `NODE_ENV=production` was
explicitly set. Frustratingly for the user there was also no warning
message that this was happening.
For example, previously when running:
```sh
NODE_ENV=production pnpm payload run ./seed.ts
```
It would still load `.env.development*` and not `.env.production*`.
The inability to override the dev flag previously made it difficult, bar
impossible (depending on ones setup), to run the CLI in a
production-like environment. Which is useful for several reasons, a few
examples being:
- Seeding production data:
```
NODE_ENV=production payload run seed.ts
```
- Capturing current schema:
```
NODE_ENV=production payload migrate:create
```
- Running one-off jobs with live data:
```
NODE_ENV=production payload run jobs/consolidate-payments.ts
```
This fix allows users to correctly target production without surprises.
### How?
- Introduced a dev constant that checks `NODE_ENV !== 'production'`
- Passed dev to `loadEnvConfig` to allow `@next/env` to resolve the
correct `.env.*` files based on the environment:
**Before:**
```ts
const { loadedEnvFiles } = loadEnvConfig(process.cwd(), true) // assuming this won't run in production
```
**After:**
```ts
const dev = process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production'
const { loadedEnvFiles } = loadEnvConfig(process.cwd(), dev)
```
The signature of `loadEnvConfig` from
[packages/next-env/index.ts](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/2086975c3c27d453e4a74fb584b76ea714a05631/packages/next-env/index.ts#L114)
is:
```ts
export function loadEnvConfig(
dir: string,
dev?: boolean,
log: Log = console,
forceReload = false,
onReload?: (envFilePath: string) => void
): {
combinedEnv: Env
parsedEnv: Env | undefined
loadedEnvFiles: LoadedEnvFiles
}
```
Logic from `loadEnvConfig` in
[packages/next-env/index.ts](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/2086975c3c27d453e4a74fb584b76ea714a05631/packages/next-env/index.ts#L136)
that handles loading dependant on the `dev` variable:
```ts
const mode = isTest ? 'test' : dev ? 'development' : 'production'
const dotenvFiles = [
`.env.${mode}.local`,
mode !== 'test' && `.env.local`,
`.env.${mode}`,
'.env',
]
```
This change allows Payload CLI commands to honor the current `NODE_ENV`,
loading `.env.production*`, as intended when running with
`NODE_ENV=production`.
No behavioral changes for existing dev users, but adds expected support
for production workflows.
---
Note:
There are a few consideration I made here.
1. Default to development if not explicitly set (I think most would
agree).
2. I haven't implemented warning for non standard `NODE_ENV` values, as
the `Next.js` cli does. For example `NODE_ENV=alpha`.
3. Extension of point 2, I haven't implemented loading of non-standard
`NODE_ENV` values.
I do believe either point 2 or 3 should be implemented however. So users
are not left surprised by the actions of the CLI.
FYI, the `Next.js` cli does the warning in the main package and not
`@next/env`. This logic exists in
[packages/next/src/bin/next.ts](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/2086975c3c27d453e4a74fb584b76ea714a05631/packages/next/src/bin/next.ts#L64):
```ts
const standardEnv = ['production', 'development', 'test']
if (process.env.NODE_ENV) {
const isNotStandard = !standardEnv.includes(process.env.NODE_ENV)
const shouldWarnCommands =
process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development'
? ['start', 'build']
: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production'
? ['dev']
: []
if (isNotStandard || shouldWarnCommands.includes(commandName)) {
warn(NON_STANDARD_NODE_ENV)
}
}
```
This warns when using the wrong `NODE_ENV` for a command (I don't think
that applies here?). Also warning when a non-standard `NODE_ENV` is used
(e.g., `NODE_ENV=alpha`) and will not attempt to load `.env.alpha*`.
This makes unexpected behaviour non-silent.
If desired, I can add the warning to this PR or follow up with a
separate PR. However, loading non-standard `NODE_ENV` is a bigger
discussion and implementation. That I would prefer to leave out of this
PR so not to block it moving along. But I felt it was worth mentioning.
⚠️ `orderable` fields will no longer be `required` and `unique`, so your
database may prompt you to accept an automatic migration if you're using
[this
feature](https://payloadcms.com/docs/configuration/collections#config-options).
Note that the `orderable` feature is still experimental, so it may still
receive breaking changes without a major upgrade or contain bugs. Use it
with caution.
___
The `orderable` fields will not have `required` and `unique` constraints
at the database schema level, in order to automatically migrate
collections that incorporate this property.
Now, when a user adds the `orderable` property to a collection or join
field, existing documents will have the order field set to undefined.
The first time you try to reorder them, the documents will be
automatically assigned an initial order, and you will be prompted to
refresh the page.
We believe this provides a better development experience than having to
manually migrate data with a script.
Additionally, it fixes a bug that occurred when using `orderable` in
conjunction with groups and tabs fields.
Closes:
- #12129
- #12331
- #12212
---------
Co-authored-by: Dan Ribbens <dan.ribbens@gmail.com>
Previously, `hidden: true` on a virtual field that references a
relationship field didn't work. Now, this field doesn't get calculated
if there's `hidden: true` and no `showHiddenFields` was passed.
Co-authored-by: Dan Ribbens <dan.ribbens@gmail.com>
Previously, plugin-cloud would only set up job auto-running if a job configuration was present in the custom config at initialization time.
However, some jobs - such as the scheduled publish job which is added during sanitization - are added after plugin-cloud has initialized. This means relying solely on the initial state of the job config is insufficient for determining whether to enable auto-running.
This PR removes that check and ensures auto-running is always initialized, allowing later-added jobs to run as expected.
## Weakening type
This PR also weakens to `config.jobs.tasks` type and makes that property optional. It's totally permissible to only have workflows that define inline tasks, and to not have any static tasks defined in `config.jobs.tasks`. Thus it makes no sense to make that property required.
Optimizes the field sanitization process by removing duplicative deep
loops over the config. We were previously iterating over all fields of
each collection potentially multiple times in order validate field
configs, check reserved field names, etc. Now, we perform all necessary
sanitization within a single loop.
Prevents an accidental lockout of query preset documents. An "accidental
lockout" occurs when the user sets access control on a preset and
excludes themselves. This can happen in a variety of scenarios,
including:
- You select `specificUsers` without specifying yourself
- You select `specificRoles` without specifying a role that you are a
part of
- Etc.
#### How it works
To make this happen, we use a custom validation function that executes
access against the user's proposed changes. If those changes happen to
remove access for them, we throw a validation error and prevent that
change from ever taking place. This means that only a user with proper
access can remove another user from the preset. You cannot remove
yourself.
To do this, we create a temporary record in the database that we can
query against. We use transactions to ensure that the temporary record
is not persisted once our work is completed. Since not all Payload
projects have transactions enabled, we flag these temporary records with
the `isTemp` field.
Once created, we query the temp document to determine its permissions.
If any of the operations throw an error, this means the user can no
longer act on them, and we throw a validation error.
#### Alternative Approach
A previous approach that was explored was to add an `owner` field to the
presets collection. This way, the "owner" of the preset would be able to
completely bypass all access control, effectively eliminating the
possibility of a lockout event.
But this doesn't work for other users who may have update access. E.g.
they could still accidentally remove themselves from the read or update
operation, preventing them from accessing that preset after submitting
the form. We need a solution that works for all users, not just the
owner.
Threads the `overrideAccess` property through the field-level
validations. This way custom `validate` functions can be aware of its
value and adjust their logic accordingly.
See #12322 for an example use case.
### What?
Allows the field value (if defined) to be accessed from `args` with
custom server components.
### Why?
Documentation states that the user can access `args.value` to get the
value of the field at time of render (if a value is defined) when using
a custom server component - however this isn't currently setup.
<img width="469" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-08 at 4 51 30 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9c167f80-5c5e-4fea-a31c-166281d9f7db"
/>
Link to docs
[here](https://payloadcms.com/docs/fields/overview#default-props).
### How?
Passes the value from `data` if it exists (does not exist for all field
types) and adds `value` to the server component types as an optional
property.
Fixes#10389
Exports a few utilities that are used internally to the login operation,
but could be helpful for others building plugins.
Specifically:
- `isUserLocked` - a check to ensure that a given user is not locked due
to too many invalid attempts
- `checkLoginPermissions` - checks to see that the user is not locked as
well as that it is properly verified, if applicable
- `jwtSign` - Payload's internal JWT signing approach
- `getFieldsToSign` - reduce down a document's fields for JWT creation
based on collection config settings
- `incrementLoginAttempts` / `resetLoginAttempts` - utilities to handle
both failed and successful login attempts
- `UnverifiedEmail` - an error that could be thrown if attempting to log
in to an account without prior successful email verification
Improves performance in local strategy uploads by reading the file and
metadata info synchronously. This change uses `promise.all` for three
separately awaited calls. This improves the perf by making all calls in
a non-blocking way.
Continuation of https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/12265.
Currently, using `select` on new relationship virtual fields:
```
const doc = await payload.findByID({
collection: 'virtual-relations',
depth: 0,
id,
select: { postTitle: true },
})
```
doesn't work, because in order to calculate `post.title`, the `post`
field must be selected as well. This PR adds logic that sanitizes the
incoming `select` to include those relationships into `select` (that are
related to selected virtual fields)
---------
Co-authored-by: Dan Ribbens <dan.ribbens@gmail.com>
### What?
It's impossible to create a user with special characters in their email
in Payload CMS 3.35.0.
The issue is that currently the regex looks like this:
...payload/packages/payload/src/fields/validations.ts (line 202-203):
const emailRegex =
/^(?!.*\.\.)[\w.%+-]+@[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?(?:\.[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?)*\.[a-z]{2,}$/i
This allows users that have the following characters in their email to
be created:
%, ., +, -
The regex needs to get updated to the following:
const emailRegex =
/^(?!.*\.\.)[\w!#$%&'*+/=?^{|}~.-]+@a-z0-9?(?:.a-z0-9?)*.[a-z]{2,}$/i`
This way all special characters `!#$%&'*+/=?^_{|}~.-`` are hereby OK to
have in the email.
I've added more test-cases to cover a couple of more scenarios in the
forked repo.
### Why?
The regex is missing some special characters that are allowed according
to standards.
### How?
* Go to the admin ui and try to create a user with any of the newly
added special characters meaning (!#$%&'*+/=?^_{|}~.-`)
* You should get a validation error. However with the addition of the
above code it should all check out.
Fixes #
https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/issues/12180
---------
Co-authored-by: Mattias Grenhall <mattias.grenhall@assaabloy.com>
### What?
So, while resetting the password using the Local API, I encountered a
validation error for localized fields. I jumped into the Payload
repository, and saw that `payload.update` is being used in the process,
with no locale specified/supported. This causes errors if the user has
localized fields, but specifying a locale for the password reset
operation would be silly, so I suggest turning this into a db operation,
just like the user fetching operation before.
### How?
I replaced this:
```TS
user = await payload.update({
id: user.id,
collection: collectionConfig.slug,
data: user,
req,
})
```
With this:
```TS
user = await payload.db.updateOne({
id: user.id,
collection: collectionConfig.slug,
data: user,
req,
})
```
So the validation of other fields would be skipped in this operation.
### Why?
This is the error I encountered while trying to reset password, it
blocks my project to go further :)
```bash
Error [ValidationError]: The following field is invalid: Data > Name
at async sendOfferEmail (src/collections/Offers/components/SendEmailButton/index.tsx:18:20)
16 | try {
17 | const payload = await getPayload({ config });
> 18 | const token = await payload.forgotPassword({
| ^
19 | collection: "offers",
20 | data: {
{
data: [Object],
isOperational: true,
isPublic: false,
status: 400,
[cause]: [Object]
}
cause:
{
id: '67f4c1df8aa60189df9bdf5c',
collection: 'offers',
errors: [
{
label: 'Data > Name',
message: 'This field is required.',
path: 'name'
}
],
global: undefined
}
```
P.S The name field is totally fine, it is required and filled with
values in both locales I use, in admin panel I can edit and save
everything without any issues.
<!--
Thank you for the PR! Please go through the checklist below and make
sure you've completed all the steps.
Please review the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
document in this repository if you haven't already.
The following items will ensure that your PR is handled as smoothly as
possible:
- PR Title must follow conventional commits format. For example, `feat:
my new feature`, `fix(plugin-seo): my fix`.
- Minimal description explained as if explained to someone not
immediately familiar with the code.
- Provide before/after screenshots or code diffs if applicable.
- Link any related issues/discussions from GitHub or Discord.
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Fixes #
-->
This PR optimizes the new virtual fields with relationships feature
https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/11805 when the path
references the ID field, for example:
```
{
name: 'postCategoryID',
type: 'number',
virtual: 'post.category.id',
},
```
Previously, we did additional population of `category`, which is
unnecessary as we can always grab the ID from the `category` value
itself. One less querying step.
### What
This PR introduces a new `beforeDocumentControls` slot to the edit view
of both collections and globals.
It allows injecting one or more custom components next to the document
control buttons (e.g., Save, Publish, Save Draft) in the admin UI —
useful for adding context, additional buttons, or custom UI elements.
#### Usage
##### For collections:
```
admin: {
components: {
edit: {
beforeDocumentControls: ['/path/to/CustomComponent'],
},
},
},
```
##### For globals:
```
admin: {
components: {
elements: {
beforeDocumentControls: ['/path/to/CustomComponent'],
},
},
},
```
This adds a new `showSaveDraftButton` option to the
`versions.drafts.autosave` config for collections and globals.
By default, the "Save as draft" button is hidden when autosave is
enabled. This new option allows the button to remain visible for manual
saves while autosave is active.
Also updates the admin UI logic to conditionally render the button when
this flag is set, and updates the documentation with an example usage.
This PR adds an ability to specify a virtual field in this way
```js
{
slug: 'posts',
fields: [
{
name: 'title',
type: 'text',
required: true,
},
],
},
{
slug: 'virtual-relations',
fields: [
{
name: 'postTitle',
type: 'text',
virtual: 'post.title',
},
{
name: 'post',
type: 'relationship',
relationTo: 'posts',
},
],
},
```
Then, every time you query `virtual-relations`, `postTitle` will be
automatically populated (even if using `depth: 0`) on the db level. This
field also, unlike `virtual: true` is available for querying / sorting /
`useAsTitle`.
Also, the field can be deeply nested to 2 or more relationships, for
example:
```
{
name: 'postCategoryTitle',
type: 'text',
virtual: 'post.category.title',
},
```
Where the current collection has `post` - a relationship to `posts`, the
collection `posts` has `category` that's a relationship to `categories`
and finally `categories` has `title`.
This PR updates the field `condition` function property to include a new
`operation` argument.
The `operation` arg provides a string relating to which operation the
field type is currently executing within.
#### Changes:
- Added `operation: Operation` in the Condition type.
- Updated relevant condition checks to ensure correct parameter usage.
Returning a boolean value from a constraint-level access control
function does nothing. For example:
```ts
{
label: 'Noone',
value: 'noone',
access: () => false,
},
```
This is because we were only handling query objects, disregarding any
boolean values. The fix is to check if the query is a boolean, and if
so, format a query object to return.
Jarrod Flesch