Previously, `hidden: true` on a virtual field that references a
relationship field didn't work. Now, this field doesn't get calculated
if there's `hidden: true` and no `showHiddenFields` was passed.
Co-authored-by: Dan Ribbens <dan.ribbens@gmail.com>
Previously, plugin-cloud would only set up job auto-running if a job configuration was present in the custom config at initialization time.
However, some jobs - such as the scheduled publish job which is added during sanitization - are added after plugin-cloud has initialized. This means relying solely on the initial state of the job config is insufficient for determining whether to enable auto-running.
This PR removes that check and ensures auto-running is always initialized, allowing later-added jobs to run as expected.
## Weakening type
This PR also weakens to `config.jobs.tasks` type and makes that property optional. It's totally permissible to only have workflows that define inline tasks, and to not have any static tasks defined in `config.jobs.tasks`. Thus it makes no sense to make that property required.
Optimizes the field sanitization process by removing duplicative deep
loops over the config. We were previously iterating over all fields of
each collection potentially multiple times in order validate field
configs, check reserved field names, etc. Now, we perform all necessary
sanitization within a single loop.
Prevents an accidental lockout of query preset documents. An "accidental
lockout" occurs when the user sets access control on a preset and
excludes themselves. This can happen in a variety of scenarios,
including:
- You select `specificUsers` without specifying yourself
- You select `specificRoles` without specifying a role that you are a
part of
- Etc.
#### How it works
To make this happen, we use a custom validation function that executes
access against the user's proposed changes. If those changes happen to
remove access for them, we throw a validation error and prevent that
change from ever taking place. This means that only a user with proper
access can remove another user from the preset. You cannot remove
yourself.
To do this, we create a temporary record in the database that we can
query against. We use transactions to ensure that the temporary record
is not persisted once our work is completed. Since not all Payload
projects have transactions enabled, we flag these temporary records with
the `isTemp` field.
Once created, we query the temp document to determine its permissions.
If any of the operations throw an error, this means the user can no
longer act on them, and we throw a validation error.
#### Alternative Approach
A previous approach that was explored was to add an `owner` field to the
presets collection. This way, the "owner" of the preset would be able to
completely bypass all access control, effectively eliminating the
possibility of a lockout event.
But this doesn't work for other users who may have update access. E.g.
they could still accidentally remove themselves from the read or update
operation, preventing them from accessing that preset after submitting
the form. We need a solution that works for all users, not just the
owner.
Threads the `overrideAccess` property through the field-level
validations. This way custom `validate` functions can be aware of its
value and adjust their logic accordingly.
See #12322 for an example use case.
### What?
Allows the field value (if defined) to be accessed from `args` with
custom server components.
### Why?
Documentation states that the user can access `args.value` to get the
value of the field at time of render (if a value is defined) when using
a custom server component - however this isn't currently setup.
<img width="469" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-08 at 4 51 30 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9c167f80-5c5e-4fea-a31c-166281d9f7db"
/>
Link to docs
[here](https://payloadcms.com/docs/fields/overview#default-props).
### How?
Passes the value from `data` if it exists (does not exist for all field
types) and adds `value` to the server component types as an optional
property.
Fixes#10389
Exports a few utilities that are used internally to the login operation,
but could be helpful for others building plugins.
Specifically:
- `isUserLocked` - a check to ensure that a given user is not locked due
to too many invalid attempts
- `checkLoginPermissions` - checks to see that the user is not locked as
well as that it is properly verified, if applicable
- `jwtSign` - Payload's internal JWT signing approach
- `getFieldsToSign` - reduce down a document's fields for JWT creation
based on collection config settings
- `incrementLoginAttempts` / `resetLoginAttempts` - utilities to handle
both failed and successful login attempts
- `UnverifiedEmail` - an error that could be thrown if attempting to log
in to an account without prior successful email verification
Improves performance in local strategy uploads by reading the file and
metadata info synchronously. This change uses `promise.all` for three
separately awaited calls. This improves the perf by making all calls in
a non-blocking way.
Continuation of https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/12265.
Currently, using `select` on new relationship virtual fields:
```
const doc = await payload.findByID({
collection: 'virtual-relations',
depth: 0,
id,
select: { postTitle: true },
})
```
doesn't work, because in order to calculate `post.title`, the `post`
field must be selected as well. This PR adds logic that sanitizes the
incoming `select` to include those relationships into `select` (that are
related to selected virtual fields)
---------
Co-authored-by: Dan Ribbens <dan.ribbens@gmail.com>
### What?
It's impossible to create a user with special characters in their email
in Payload CMS 3.35.0.
The issue is that currently the regex looks like this:
...payload/packages/payload/src/fields/validations.ts (line 202-203):
const emailRegex =
/^(?!.*\.\.)[\w.%+-]+@[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?(?:\.[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?)*\.[a-z]{2,}$/i
This allows users that have the following characters in their email to
be created:
%, ., +, -
The regex needs to get updated to the following:
const emailRegex =
/^(?!.*\.\.)[\w!#$%&'*+/=?^{|}~.-]+@a-z0-9?(?:.a-z0-9?)*.[a-z]{2,}$/i`
This way all special characters `!#$%&'*+/=?^_{|}~.-`` are hereby OK to
have in the email.
I've added more test-cases to cover a couple of more scenarios in the
forked repo.
### Why?
The regex is missing some special characters that are allowed according
to standards.
### How?
* Go to the admin ui and try to create a user with any of the newly
added special characters meaning (!#$%&'*+/=?^_{|}~.-`)
* You should get a validation error. However with the addition of the
above code it should all check out.
Fixes #
https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/issues/12180
---------
Co-authored-by: Mattias Grenhall <mattias.grenhall@assaabloy.com>
### What?
So, while resetting the password using the Local API, I encountered a
validation error for localized fields. I jumped into the Payload
repository, and saw that `payload.update` is being used in the process,
with no locale specified/supported. This causes errors if the user has
localized fields, but specifying a locale for the password reset
operation would be silly, so I suggest turning this into a db operation,
just like the user fetching operation before.
### How?
I replaced this:
```TS
user = await payload.update({
id: user.id,
collection: collectionConfig.slug,
data: user,
req,
})
```
With this:
```TS
user = await payload.db.updateOne({
id: user.id,
collection: collectionConfig.slug,
data: user,
req,
})
```
So the validation of other fields would be skipped in this operation.
### Why?
This is the error I encountered while trying to reset password, it
blocks my project to go further :)
```bash
Error [ValidationError]: The following field is invalid: Data > Name
at async sendOfferEmail (src/collections/Offers/components/SendEmailButton/index.tsx:18:20)
16 | try {
17 | const payload = await getPayload({ config });
> 18 | const token = await payload.forgotPassword({
| ^
19 | collection: "offers",
20 | data: {
{
data: [Object],
isOperational: true,
isPublic: false,
status: 400,
[cause]: [Object]
}
cause:
{
id: '67f4c1df8aa60189df9bdf5c',
collection: 'offers',
errors: [
{
label: 'Data > Name',
message: 'This field is required.',
path: 'name'
}
],
global: undefined
}
```
P.S The name field is totally fine, it is required and filled with
values in both locales I use, in admin panel I can edit and save
everything without any issues.
<!--
Thank you for the PR! Please go through the checklist below and make
sure you've completed all the steps.
Please review the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
document in this repository if you haven't already.
The following items will ensure that your PR is handled as smoothly as
possible:
- PR Title must follow conventional commits format. For example, `feat:
my new feature`, `fix(plugin-seo): my fix`.
- Minimal description explained as if explained to someone not
immediately familiar with the code.
- Provide before/after screenshots or code diffs if applicable.
- Link any related issues/discussions from GitHub or Discord.
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Fixes #
-->
This PR optimizes the new virtual fields with relationships feature
https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/11805 when the path
references the ID field, for example:
```
{
name: 'postCategoryID',
type: 'number',
virtual: 'post.category.id',
},
```
Previously, we did additional population of `category`, which is
unnecessary as we can always grab the ID from the `category` value
itself. One less querying step.
### What
This PR introduces a new `beforeDocumentControls` slot to the edit view
of both collections and globals.
It allows injecting one or more custom components next to the document
control buttons (e.g., Save, Publish, Save Draft) in the admin UI —
useful for adding context, additional buttons, or custom UI elements.
#### Usage
##### For collections:
```
admin: {
components: {
edit: {
beforeDocumentControls: ['/path/to/CustomComponent'],
},
},
},
```
##### For globals:
```
admin: {
components: {
elements: {
beforeDocumentControls: ['/path/to/CustomComponent'],
},
},
},
```
This adds a new `showSaveDraftButton` option to the
`versions.drafts.autosave` config for collections and globals.
By default, the "Save as draft" button is hidden when autosave is
enabled. This new option allows the button to remain visible for manual
saves while autosave is active.
Also updates the admin UI logic to conditionally render the button when
this flag is set, and updates the documentation with an example usage.
This PR adds an ability to specify a virtual field in this way
```js
{
slug: 'posts',
fields: [
{
name: 'title',
type: 'text',
required: true,
},
],
},
{
slug: 'virtual-relations',
fields: [
{
name: 'postTitle',
type: 'text',
virtual: 'post.title',
},
{
name: 'post',
type: 'relationship',
relationTo: 'posts',
},
],
},
```
Then, every time you query `virtual-relations`, `postTitle` will be
automatically populated (even if using `depth: 0`) on the db level. This
field also, unlike `virtual: true` is available for querying / sorting /
`useAsTitle`.
Also, the field can be deeply nested to 2 or more relationships, for
example:
```
{
name: 'postCategoryTitle',
type: 'text',
virtual: 'post.category.title',
},
```
Where the current collection has `post` - a relationship to `posts`, the
collection `posts` has `category` that's a relationship to `categories`
and finally `categories` has `title`.
This PR updates the field `condition` function property to include a new
`operation` argument.
The `operation` arg provides a string relating to which operation the
field type is currently executing within.
#### Changes:
- Added `operation: Operation` in the Condition type.
- Updated relevant condition checks to ensure correct parameter usage.
Returning a boolean value from a constraint-level access control
function does nothing. For example:
```ts
{
label: 'Noone',
value: 'noone',
access: () => false,
},
```
This is because we were only handling query objects, disregarding any
boolean values. The fix is to check if the query is a boolean, and if
so, format a query object to return.
Re-ordering documents with drafts uses `payload.update()` with `select:
{ id: true }` and that causes draft versions of those docs to be updated
without any data. I've removed the `select` optimization to prevent data
loss.
Fixes#12097
### What?
This PR adds the ability to use the ListDrawer component for selecting
related collections for the relationship field instead of the default
drop down interface. This exposes the advanced filtering options that
the list view provides and provides a good interface for searching for
the correct relationship when the workflows may be more complicated.
I've added an additional "selectionType" prop to the relationship field
admin config that defaults to "dropdown" for compatability with the
existing implementation but "drawer" can be passed in as well which
enables using the ListDrawer for selecting related components.
### Why?
Adding the ability to search through the list view enables advanced
workflows or handles edge cases when just using the useAsTitle may not
be informative enough to find the related record that the user wants.
For example, if we have a collection of oscars nominations and are
trying to relate the nomination to the person who recieved the
nomination there may be multiple actors with the same name (Michelle
Williams, for example:
[https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0931329/](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0931329/),
[https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0931332/](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0931332/)).
It would be hard to search through the current dropdown ui to choose the
correct person, but in the list view the user could use other fields to
identify the correct person such as an imdb id, description, or anything
else they have in the collection for that person. Other advanced
workflows could be if there are multiple versions of a record in a
collection and the user wants to select the most recent one or just
anything where the user needs to see more details about the record that
they are setting up the relationship to.
### How?
This implementation just re-uses the useListDrawer hook and the
ListDrawer component so the code changes are pretty minimal. The main
change is a new onListSelect handler that gets passed into the
ListDrawer and handles updating the value in the field when a record is
selected in the ListDrawer.
There were also a two things that I didn't implement as they would
require broader code changes 1) Bulk select from the ListDrawer when a
relationship is hasMany - when using bulkSelect in the list drawer the
relatedCollection doesn't get returned so this doesn't work for
polymorphic relationships. Updating this would involve changing the
useListDrawer hook 2) Hide values that are already selected from the
ListDrawer - potentially possible by modifying the filterOptions and
passing in an additional filter but honestly it may not be desired
behaviour to hide values from the ListDrawer as this could be confusing
for the user if they don't see records that they are expected to see
(maybe if anything make them unselectable and indicate that they are
disabled). Currently if an already selected value gets selected the
selected value gets replaced by the new value
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fee164da-4270-4612-9304-73ccf34ccf69
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacob Fletcher <jacobsfletch@gmail.com>
### What?
This PR corrects a typo in an error message and removes a console.log from the `orderBeforeChangeHook` hook.
### Why?
An error message contains a typo, and every time I reorder an orderable collection, `do not enter` gets logged.
<img width="153" alt="Screenshot 2025-04-11 at 1 11 29 AM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/13ae106b-0bb9-4421-9083-330d3b6f356d" />
### What?
This PR adds support for `where` querying by the join field (don't
confuse with `where` querying of related docs via `joins.where`)
Previously, this didn't work:
```
const categories = await payload.find({
collection: 'categories',
where: { 'relatedPosts.title': { equals: 'my-title' } },
})
```
### Why?
This is crucial for bi-directional relationships, can be used for access
control.
### How?
Implements `where` handling for join fields the same as we do for
relationships. In MongoDB it's not as efficient as it can be, the old PR
that improves it and can be updated later is here
https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/8858
Fixes https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/discussions/9683
This PR adds a new `SchedulePublish` config type on our schedulePublish
configuration in versions from being just boolean.
Two new options are supported:
- `timeFormat` which controls the formatting of the time slots, allowing
users to change from a 12-hour clock to a 24-hour clock (default to 12
hour)
- `timeIntervals` which controls the generated time slots (default 5)
Example configuration:
```
versions: {
drafts: {
schedulePublish: {
timeFormat: 'HH:mm',
timeIntervals: 5,
},
},
},
```
Fixes form state race conditions. Modifying state while a request is in
flight or while the response is being processed could result in those
changes being overridden.
This was happening for a few reasons:
1. Our merge logic was incorrect. We were disregarding local changes to
state that may have occurred while form state requests are pending. This
was because we were iterating over local state, then while building up
new state, we were ignoring any fields that did not exist in the server
response, like this:
```ts
for (const [path, newFieldState] of Object.entries(existingState)) {
if (!incomingState[path]) {
continue
}
// ...
}
```
To fix this, we need to use local state as the source of truth. Then
when the server state arrives, we need to iterate over _that_. If a
field matches in local state, merge in any new properties. This will
ensure all changes to the underlying state are preserved, including any
potential addition or deletions.
However, this logic breaks down if the server might have created _new_
fields, like when populating array rows. This means they, too, would be
ignored. To get around this, there is a new `addedByServer` property
that flags new fields to ensure they are kept.
This new merge strategy also saves an additional loop over form state.
1. We were merging form state based on a mutable ref. This meant that
changes made within one action cause concurrent actions to have dirty
reads. The fix for this is to merge in an isolated manner by copying
state. This will remove any object references. It is generally not good
practice to mutate state without setting it, anyways, as this causes
mismatches between what is rendered and what is in memory.
1. We were merging server form state directly within an effect, then
replacing state entirely. This meant that if another action took place
at the exact moment in time _after_ merge but _before_ dispatch, the
results of that other action would be completely overridden. The fix for
this is to perform the merge within the reducer itself. This will ensure
that we are working with a trustworthy snapshot of state at the exact
moment in time that the action was invoked, and that React can properly
queue the event within its lifecycle.
Previously, querying by polymorphic joins `relationTo` with
`overrideAccess: false` caused an error:
```
QueryError: The following paths cannot be queried: relationTo
```
As this field actually doesn't exist in the schema. Now, under condition
that the query comes from a polymorphic join we skip checking
`relationTo` field access.
When postgres is used and orderable is enabled, payload cannot update
the docs to set the order correctly. This is because the sort on
postgres pushes `null` values to the top causing unique constraints to
error when two documents are updated to the same _order value.
Fixes https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/issues/11888
Previously, if you had `disableLocalStategy: true` and a custom
`password` field, Payload would still control it in `update.ts` by
deleting. Now, we don't do that in this case, unless we have
`disableLocalStetegy.enableFields: true`.
Significantly optimizes the component rendering strategy within the form
state endpoint by precisely rendering only the fields that require it.
This cuts down on server processing and network response sizes when
invoking form state requests **that manipulate array and block rows
which contain server components**, such as rich text fields, custom row
labels, etc. (results listed below).
Here's a breakdown of the issue:
Previously, when manipulating array and block fields, _all_ rows would
render any server components that might exist within them, including
rich text fields. This means that subsequent changes to these fields
would potentially _re-render_ those same components even if they don't
require it.
For example, if you have an array field with a rich text field within
it, adding the first row would cause the rich text field to render,
which is expected. However, when you add a second row, the rich text
field within the first row would render again unnecessarily along with
the new row.
This is especially noticeable for fields with many rows, where every
single row processes its server components and returns RSC data. And
this does not only affect nested rich text fields, but any custom
component defined on the field level, as these are handled in the same
way.
The reason this was necessary in the first place was to ensure that the
server components receive the proper data when they are rendered, such
as the row index and the row's data. Changing one of these rows could
cause the server component to receive the wrong data if it was not
freshly rendered.
While this is still a requirement that rows receive up-to-date props, it
is no longer necessary to render everything.
Here's a breakdown of the actual fix:
This change ensures that only the fields that are actually being
manipulated will be rendered, rather than all rows. The existing rows
will remain in memory on the client, while the newly rendered components
will return from the server. For example, if you add a new row to an
array field, only the new row will render its server components.
To do this, we send the path of the field that is being manipulated to
the server. The server can then use this path to determine for itself
which fields have already been rendered and which ones need required
rendering.
## Results
The following results were gathered by booting up the `form-state` test
suite and seeding 100 array rows, each containing a rich text field. To
invoke a form state request, we navigate to a document within the
"posts" collection, then add a new array row to the list. The result is
then saved to the file system for comparison.
| Test Suite | Collection | Number of Rows | Before | After | Percentage
Change |
|------|------|---------|--------|--------|--------|
| `form-state` | `posts` | 101 | 1.9MB / 266ms | 80KB / 70ms | ~96%
smaller / ~75% faster |
---------
Co-authored-by: James <james@trbl.design>
Co-authored-by: Alessio Gravili <alessio@gravili.de>
Fixes https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/issues/11901
Previously, when `ValidationError` `errors.path` was referring to a
field with `label` defined as a function, the error message was
generated with `[object Object]`. Now, we call that function instead.
Since the `i18n` argument is required for `StaticLabel`, this PR
introduces so you can pass a partial `req` to `ValidationError` from
which we thread `req.i18n` to the label args.
### What?
Previously if you used the typescriptSchema and `returned: false`, the
field would still be required anyways.
### Why?
We were adding fields to be required on the collection without comparing
the returned schema from typescriptSchema functions.
### How?
This changes the order of logic so that `requiredFieldNames` on the
collection is only after running and checking the field schema.
Continuation of #11867. When rendering custom fields nested within
arrays or blocks, such as the Lexical rich text editor which is treated
as a custom field, these fields will sometimes disappear when form state
requests are invoked sequentially. This is especially reproducible on
slow networks.
This is different from the previous PR in that this issue is caused by
adding _rows_ back-to-back, whereas the previous issue was caused when
adding a single row followed by a change to another field.
Here's a screen recording demonstrating the issue:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5ecfa9ec-b747-49ed-8618-df282e64519d
The problem is that `requiresRender` is never sent in the form state
request for row 2. This is because the [task
queue](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/11579) processes tasks
within a single `useEffect`. This forces React to batch the results of
these tasks into a single rendering cycle. So if request 1 sets state
that request 2 relies on, request 2 will never use that state since
they'll execute within the same lifecycle.
Here's a play-by-play of the current behavior:
1. The "add row" event is dispatched
a. This sets `requiresRender: true` in form state
1. A form state request is sent with `requiresRender: true`
1. While that request is processing, another "add row" event is
dispatched
a. This sets `requiresRender: true` in form state
b. This adds a form state request into the queue
1. The initial form state request finishes
a. This sets `requiresRender: false` in form state
1. The next form state request that was queued up in 3b is sent with
`requiresRender: false`
a. THIS IS EXPECTED, BUT SHOULD ACTUALLY BE `true`!!
To fix this this, we need to ensure that the `requiresRender` property
is persisted into the second request instead of overridden. To do this,
we can add a new `serverPropsToIgnore` to form state which is read when
the processing results from the server. So if `requiresRender` exists in
`serverPropsToIgnore`, we do not merge it. This works because we
actually mutate form state in between requests. So request 2 can read
the results from request 1 without going through an additional rendering
cycle.
Here's a play-by-play of the fix:
1. The "add row" event is dispatched
a. This sets `requiresRender: true` in form state
b. This adds a task in the queue to mutate form state with
`requiresRender: true`
1. A form state request is sent with `requiresRender: true`
1. While that request is processing, another "add row" event is
dispatched
a. This sets `requiresRender: true` in form state AND
`serverPropsToIgnore: [ "requiresRender" ]`
c. This adds a form state request into the queue
1. The initial form state request finishes
a. This returns `requiresRender: false` from the form state endpoint BUT
IS IGNORED
1. The next form state request that was queued up in 3c is sent with
`requiresRender: true`
Previously, jobs were executed in FIFO order on MongoDB, and LIFO on
Postgres, with no way to configure this behavior.
This PR makes FIFO the default on both MongoDB and Postgres and
introduces the following new options to configure the processing order
globally or on a queue-by-queue basis:
- a `processingOrder` property to the jobs config
- a `processingOrder` argument to `payload.jobs.run()` to override
what's set in the jobs config
It also adds a new `sequential` option to `payload.jobs.run()`, which
can be useful for debugging.
This adds support for running multiple job queue tasks in parallel
within the same workflow while preventing conflicts. Previously, this
would have caused the following issues:
- Job log entries get lost - the final job log is incomplete, despite
all tasks having been executed
- Write conflicts in postgres, leading to unique constraint violation
errors
The solution involves handling job log data updates in a way that avoids
overwriting, and ensuring the final update reflects the latest job log
data. Each job log entry now initializes its own ID, so a given job log
entry’s ID remains the same across multiple, parallel task executions.
## Postgres
In Postgres, we need to enable transactions for the
`payload.db.updateJobs` operation; otherwise, two tasks updating the
same job in parallel can conflict. This happens because Postgres handles
array rows by deleting them all, then re-inserting (rather than
upserting). The rows are stored in a separate table, and the following
scenario can occur:
Op 1: deletes all job log rows
Op 2: deletes all job log rows
Op 1: inserts 200 job log rows
Op 2: insert the same 200 job log rows again => `error: “duplicate key
value violates unique constraint "payload_jobs_log_pkey”`
Because transactions were not used, the rows inserted by Op 1
immediately became visible to Op 2, causing the conflict. Enabling
transactions fixes this. In theory, it can still happen if Op 1 commits
before Op 2 starts inserting (due to the read committed isolation
level), but it should occur far less frequently.
Alongside this change, we should consider inserting the rows using an
upsert (update on conflict), which will get rid of this error
completely. That way, if the insertion of Op 1 is visible to Op 2, Op 2
will simply overwrite it, rather than erroring. Individual job entries
are immutable and job entries cannot be deleted, thus this shouldn't
corrupt any data.
## Mongo
In Mongo, the issue is addressed by ensuring that log row deletions
caused due to different log states in concurrent operations are not
merged back to the client job log, and by making sure the final update
includes all job logs.
There is no duplicate key error in Mongo because the array log resides
in the same document and duplicates are simply upserted. We cannot use
transactions in Mongo, as it appears to lock the document in a way that
prevents reliable parallel updates, leading to:
`MongoServerError: WriteConflict error: this operation conflicted with
another operation. Please retry your operation or multi-document
transaction`
You can access the database name from `sanitizedConfig.db.name`. But
currently, it' not possible to access the db name from the unsanitized
config.
Plugins only have access to the unsanitized config. This change allows
db adapters to return the db name early, which will allow plugins to
conditionally initialize db-specific functionality
Synchronous file system operations such as `readFileSync` block the
event loop, whereas the asynchronous equivalents (like await
`fs.promises.readFile`) do not. This PR replaces certain synchronous fs
calls with their asynchronous counterparts in contexts where async
operations are already in use, improving performance by avoiding event
loop blocking.
Most of the synchronous calls were in our file upload code. Converting
them to async should theoretically free up the event loop and allow
more, other requests to run in parallel without delay
### What?
Fixed client config caching to properly update when switching languages
in the admin UI.
### Why?
Currently, switching languages doesn't fully update the UI because
client config stays cached with previous language translations.
### How?
Created a language-aware caching system that stores separate configs for
each language and only uses cached config when it matches the active
language.
Before:
```typescript
let cachedClientConfig: ClientConfig | null = global._payload_clientConfig
if (!cachedClientConfig) {
cachedClientConfig = global._payload_clientConfig = null
}
export const getClientConfig = cache(
(args: { config: SanitizedConfig; i18n: I18nClient; importMap: ImportMap }): ClientConfig => {
if (cachedClientConfig && !global._payload_doNotCacheClientConfig) {
return cachedClientConfig
}
// ... create new config ...
}
);
```
After:
```typescript
let cachedClientConfigs: Record<string, ClientConfig> = global._payload_localizedClientConfigs
if (!cachedClientConfigs) {
cachedClientConfigs = global._payload_localizedClientConfigs = {}
}
export const getClientConfig = cache(
(args: { config: SanitizedConfig; i18n: I18nClient; importMap: ImportMap }): ClientConfig => {
const { config, i18n, importMap } = args
const currentLocale = i18n.language
if (!global._payload_doNotCacheClientConfig && cachedClientConfigs[currentLocale]) {
return cachedClientConfigs[currentLocale]
}
// ... create new config with correct translations ...
}
);
```
Also added handling for cache clearing during HMR to ensure
compatibility with the existing system.
Fixes#11406
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacob Fletcher <jacobsfletch@gmail.com>
There are cases when a storage plugin is disabled during development and
enabled in production. This will result in import maps that differ
depending on if they're generated during development or production.
In a lot of cases, those import maps are generated during
development-only. During production, we just re-use what was generated
locally. This will cause missing import map entries for those plugins
that are disabled during development.
This PR ensures the import map entries are added regardless of the
enabled state of those plugins. This is necessary for our
generate-templates script to not omit the vercel blob storage import map
entry.
Continuation of #11489. This adds a new, optional `updateJobs` db
adapter method that reduces the amount of database calls for the jobs
queue.
## MongoDB
### Previous: running a set of 50 queued jobs
- 1x db.find (= 1x `Model.paginate`)
- 50x db.updateOne (= 50x `Model.findOneAndUpdate`)
### Now: running a set of 50 queued jobs
- 1x db.updateJobs (= 1x `Model.find` and 1x `Model.updateMany`)
**=> 51 db round trips before, 2 db round trips after**
### Previous: upon task completion
- 1x db.find (= 1x `Model.paginate`)
- 1x db.updateOne (= 1x `Model.findOneAndUpdate`)
### Now: upon task completion
- 1x db.updateJobs (= 1x `Model.findOneAndUpdate`)
**=> 2 db round trips before, 1 db round trip after**
## Drizzle (e.g. Postgres)
### running a set of 50 queued jobs
- 1x db.query[tablename].findMany
- 50x db.select
- 50x upsertRow
This is unaffected by this PR and will be addressed in a future PR
Sasha