mirror of
https://github.com/openprose/prose.git
synced 2026-09-19 05:55:05 +08:00
63c8ce4b23
Move the standard library (previously `github.com/openprose/std`) and
the company-as-prose library (previously local dir
`/Users/sl/code/openprose/company-as-prose`) into this repository
under `packages/std/` and `packages/co/` respectively.
Motivation: concentrate attention on one repository so stars,
discussions, and issues aggregate. `openprose/std` was a genuinely
useful asset nobody could find because ~50 stars on its own repo
told a much worse story than 1,106 stars on `openprose/prose`
would have. Same logic applies to co.
Layout choice: `packages/{std,co}/` rather than `std/` + `co/` at
the repo root. Root siblings accumulate over time, and a flat
top-level made future libraries (hub, kit, dev, etc.) compete with
spec infrastructure. `packages/` is bounded — new libraries land
there without cluttering root. Matches pnpm/Deno/monorepo tooling
conventions.
Changes:
- New: `packages/std/` (copied from openprose/std, `.git` excluded)
- New: `packages/co/` (copied from company-as-prose, README updated
for new name and location)
- `packages/std/README.md`: updated shorthand expansion reference
- `packages/co/README.md`: renamed "company-as-prose" to "co" in
self-references, added std-vs-co split heuristic, updated
`prose run` examples to use `co/` shorthand
- `skills/open-prose/deps.md`:
- `std/` shorthand now expands to
`github.com/openprose/prose/packages/std/`
- `co/` shorthand added, expands to
`github.com/openprose/prose/packages/co/`
- Both shorthands resolve into the same clone of
`openprose/prose` under `.deps/github.com/openprose/prose/`;
`packages/std/` and `packages/co/` are sibling subdirectories
- `prose.lock` format row updated to `host/owner/repo sha`
(matches the explicit-host resolution that landed in #35)
- `.deps/` directory structure example redrawn to show the
`{host}/{owner}/{repo}/packages/{std,co}/...` shape
- Error message and Interaction tables refreshed accordingly
- Resolution Algorithm step 1 now documents both shorthands
- `skills/open-prose/forme.md`: Step 2 resolution list updated to
include co/ shorthand and the host-keyed `.deps/` layout
- `skills/open-prose/help.md`: Q&A "How do dependencies work?"
rewritten to name both shorthands and the new explicit-host model
- `skills/open-prose/state/filesystem.md`: `.deps/` directory
tree re-drawn to include the `{host}/` layer with std/co as
sibling packages inside the clone
- `skills/open-prose/guidance/patterns.md`,
`skills/open-prose/guidance/antipatterns.md`: examples now use
the `std/` shorthand or explicit `github.com/...` rather than
the deprecated bare `openprose/std/` form
- `skills/open-prose/examples/registry-import/index.md`: sample
service reference switched to `std/evals/inspector`
- `README.md`: Stdlib badge replaced with internal `packages/std/`
link plus new `packages/co/` link; "Standard Library" section
rewritten as "Libraries" with both packages described
Out of scope for this PR (deliberately):
- Tooling changes to `prose install` and Forme's `.deps/` writer
to adopt the `{host}/{owner}/{repo}/` layout in practice — this
PR is spec-only. Existing tooling continues to work against
whatever layout it currently implements; the spec now describes
the target.
- Retiring the `openprose/std` GitHub repo. Delete that repo
separately after this merges.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.7 KiB
3.7 KiB
name, kind
| name | kind |
|---|---|
| worker-critic | composite |
Worker-Critic
One agent works, another evaluates. Retry until the critic accepts or budget exhausts.
Description
Iteratively refines a worker's output by looping through critic evaluation until acceptance or budget exhaustion.
Metadata
version: 0.1.0
Slots
worker(primary)- requires: task_brief, optional critique from previous attempt
- ensures: result text
critic- requires: worker result, original task_brief, criteria
- ensures: structured verdict with accept/reject, reasoning, issues, suggestions
Config
task_brief(string, default: none): The task to pass to the workercriteria(string, default: none): Acceptance criteria the critic evaluates againstmax_rounds(integer, default: 3): Maximum number of worker-critic cycles before returning best attempt
Invariants
- Worker never sees the raw criteria — only the critique derived from them
- Critic always receives the original task brief alongside the result
- On accept the loop exits immediately and returns the worker's result
- After max_rounds exhausted the final attempt is returned with its critique
Shape
self: manage retry loop, pass critique to worker, return accepted resultdelegates:worker: produce result from briefcritic: evaluate result against criteria
prohibited: none
Requires
- &compositeState exists at __compositeState with: worker: string -- component name to use as worker critic: string -- component name to use as critic task_brief: string -- the task to pass to the worker criteria: string -- acceptance criteria for the critic max_rounds: number -- (optional, default 3)
Ensures
- Worker receives only the task brief (first attempt) or task brief + critique (retries)
- Critic receives the worker's result AND the original task brief AND the criteria
- Critic returns { verdict: "accept" | "reject", reasoning, issues, suggestions }
- On reject: worker receives the critique as learning signal — not the raw task repeated
- On accept: return the worker's result immediately
- After max_rounds exhausted: return the best attempt with the final critique
- &compositeState.result contains the final output
- &compositeState.attempts contains the count
Delegation Loop
const { worker, critic, task_brief, criteria, max_rounds = 3 } = __compositeState;
let lastResult = null;
let lastCritique = null;
for (let attempt = 0; attempt < max_rounds; attempt++) {
// Build worker brief
let workerBrief = task_brief;
if (lastCritique) {
workerBrief += `\n\nPrevious attempt was rejected.\nCritique: ${lastCritique.reasoning}`;
if (lastCritique.suggestions?.length) {
workerBrief += `\nSuggestions: ${lastCritique.suggestions.join("; ")}`;
}
}
lastResult = await rlm(workerBrief, null, { use: worker });
// Build critic brief
const criticBrief = `Evaluate this result against the criteria.\n\nOriginal task: ${task_brief}\nCriteria: ${criteria}\n\nResult to evaluate:\n${lastResult}`;
const verdict = await rlm(criticBrief, null, { use: critic });
// Parse verdict — critic should return structured assessment
if (verdict?.verdict === "accept" || /accept/i.test(String(verdict))) {
__compositeState.result = lastResult;
__compositeState.attempts = attempt + 1;
return(lastResult);
}
lastCritique = verdict;
}
__compositeState.result = lastResult;
__compositeState.attempts = max_rounds;
__compositeState.final_critique = lastCritique;
return(lastResult);
Notes
This is a seed pattern in the standard library. The worker does not know it will be critiqued. The critic does not know its verdict triggers a retry. Multi-polarity is managed here, not in the children.