mirror of
https://github.com/nexu-io/open-design.git
synced 2026-09-20 06:15:06 +08:00
f1a0b60c6c
* chore: unify product name display to OpenDesign repo-wide Rename the user-facing product name from "Open Design" to "OpenDesign" across documentation, web/desktop UI strings, i18n locales, prompts, plugin/skill/design-system content, changelogs, and specs, matching the landing-page rename already in flight. Deliberately excluded so installed-app identity stays untouched: - packages/release PRODUCT_NAME and everything derived from it (app bundle names, installer/registry identity, updater feeds) - tools/pack, tools/release, apps/packaged, landing page (PR #6983) - mocks/ recorded traces and LICENSE - test fixtures and comments that encode real on-disk install paths (Open Design.app, Program Files\Open Design, AppData paths) Validated with pnpm guard, pnpm typecheck, and targeted web/desktop/host test runs over the renamed strings. * fix(web): keep two-letter author monogram for CamelCase brand names authorInitials split words on whitespace only, so the renamed single-token author name "OpenDesign" produced a one-letter monogram. Treat lower-to-upper CamelCase boundaries as word breaks so the avatar fallback stays "OD". * fix(release): restore spaced Windows source artifact names in win.ps1 tools/pack still derives builder outputs from the unchanged PRODUCT_NAME ("Open Design"), so the asset script must look for the spaced filenames. Matches the mac/mac-intel/linux asset scripts, which were already kept on the original names. --------- Co-authored-by: Joey <236967869+joeylee12629-star@users.noreply.github.com>
184 lines
5.9 KiB
JSON
184 lines
5.9 KiB
JSON
{
|
||
"$schema": "https://open-design.ai/schemas/plugin.v1.json",
|
||
"specVersion": "1.0.0",
|
||
"name": "example-simple-deck",
|
||
"title": "Write an Operating Review like a Disciplined COO",
|
||
"title_i18n": {
|
||
"en": "Write an Operating Review like a Disciplined COO",
|
||
"zh-CN": "像克制的 COO 一样写经营复盘",
|
||
"zh-TW": "像克制的 COO 一样写经营复盘"
|
||
},
|
||
"version": "0.1.1",
|
||
"publishedAt": "2026-05-12T07:18:16Z",
|
||
"description": "OpenDesign's operating review: growth, burn, and the concrete path to sustainability without losing the open ethos. Built as a decision-grade corporate strategy deck for leadership team.",
|
||
"description_i18n": {
|
||
"en": "OpenDesign's operating review: growth, burn, and the concrete path to sustainability without losing the open ethos. Built as a decision-grade corporate strategy deck for leadership team.",
|
||
"zh-CN": "像克制的 COO 一样写经营复盘——一份可商业交付的企业战略 Deck,围绕真实主题、证据链与决策目标组织。",
|
||
"zh-TW": "像克制的 COO 一样写经营复盘——一份可商业交付的企业战略 Deck,围绕真实主题、证据链与决策目标组织。"
|
||
},
|
||
"license": "MIT",
|
||
"author": {
|
||
"name": "OpenDesign",
|
||
"url": "https://github.com/nexu-io"
|
||
},
|
||
"homepage": "https://github.com/nexu-io/open-design/tree/main/plugins/_official/examples/simple-deck",
|
||
"tags": [
|
||
"example",
|
||
"first-party",
|
||
"deck",
|
||
"product",
|
||
"web",
|
||
"slides",
|
||
"ppt",
|
||
"presentation",
|
||
"untitled",
|
||
"roadmap",
|
||
"architecture",
|
||
"simple-deck",
|
||
"product-and-technical-management",
|
||
"corporate-strategy",
|
||
"board-pre-read-deck",
|
||
"strategy",
|
||
"board",
|
||
"business-review",
|
||
"decision-deck",
|
||
"commercial-slide-agent"
|
||
],
|
||
"compat": {
|
||
"agentSkills": [
|
||
{
|
||
"path": "./SKILL.md"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
"od": {
|
||
"kind": "scenario",
|
||
"taskKind": "new-generation",
|
||
"mode": "deck",
|
||
"scenario": "strategy",
|
||
"surface": "web",
|
||
"preview": {
|
||
"type": "html",
|
||
"entry": "./example.html"
|
||
},
|
||
"useCase": {
|
||
"query": {
|
||
"en": "Create \"Write an Operating Review like a Disciplined COO\" as a decision-grade Corporate strategy deck in this template's own visual system. Subject: OpenDesign's operating review: growth, burn, and the concrete path to sustainability without losing the open ethos. Audience: leadership team. First ask only for missing essentials: audience, decision target, source-of-truth materials, deadline, and must-keep numbers. Then produce the slide plan, written slides, visual direction, speaker-ready structure, and a critic pass against this rubric: would a board member know what to approve and why before page five.",
|
||
"zh-CN": "像克制的 COO 一样写经营复盘。像克制的 COO 一样写经营复盘——一份可商业交付的企业战略 Deck,围绕真实主题、证据链与决策目标组织。 主题:OpenDesign's operating review: growth, burn, and the concrete path to sustainability without losing the open ethos. 先确认受众、决策目标、素材来源、截止时间和必须保留的数据,再输出叙事主线、页面规划、逐页文案、视觉方向和按评审标准自检的版本。"
|
||
},
|
||
"exampleOutputs": [
|
||
{
|
||
"path": "./example.html",
|
||
"title": "Write an Operating Review like a Disciplined COO",
|
||
"title_i18n": {
|
||
"en": "Write an Operating Review like a Disciplined COO",
|
||
"zh-CN": "像克制的 COO 一样写经营复盘",
|
||
"zh-TW": "像克制的 COO 一样写经营复盘"
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
"inputs": [
|
||
{
|
||
"name": "deckType",
|
||
"label": "Deck type",
|
||
"type": "select",
|
||
"required": true,
|
||
"options": [
|
||
"pitch deck",
|
||
"product overview",
|
||
"study deck",
|
||
"strategy deck",
|
||
"sales deck"
|
||
],
|
||
"default": "pitch deck"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"name": "topic",
|
||
"label": "Topic",
|
||
"type": "string",
|
||
"required": true,
|
||
"placeholder": "AI operations platform for modern support teams",
|
||
"default": "the user's brief"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"name": "audience",
|
||
"label": "Audience",
|
||
"type": "string",
|
||
"required": true,
|
||
"placeholder": "Series A investors",
|
||
"default": "decision makers"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"name": "slideCount",
|
||
"label": "Pages",
|
||
"type": "select",
|
||
"required": true,
|
||
"options": [
|
||
"5-10 pages",
|
||
"10-15 pages",
|
||
"15-20 pages",
|
||
"20-25 pages",
|
||
"25-30 pages"
|
||
],
|
||
"default": "10-15 pages"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"name": "speakerNotes",
|
||
"label": "Speaker notes",
|
||
"type": "select",
|
||
"options": [
|
||
"include speaker notes",
|
||
"no speaker notes"
|
||
],
|
||
"default": "include speaker notes"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"name": "designSystem",
|
||
"label": "Design system",
|
||
"type": "string",
|
||
"placeholder": "Swiss, Linear, editorial, or active project design system",
|
||
"default": "the active project design system"
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"context": {
|
||
"skills": [
|
||
{
|
||
"path": "./SKILL.md"
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"designSystem": {
|
||
"primary": true
|
||
},
|
||
"assets": [
|
||
"./example.html",
|
||
"./assets/template.html",
|
||
"./references/checklist.md",
|
||
"./references/layouts.md"
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
"pipeline": {
|
||
"stages": [
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "discovery",
|
||
"atoms": [
|
||
"discovery-question-form"
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "generate",
|
||
"atoms": [
|
||
"file-write",
|
||
"live-artifact"
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
"capabilities": [
|
||
"prompt:inject",
|
||
"fs:write"
|
||
],
|
||
"category": "corporate-strategy"
|
||
}
|
||
}
|