skills/kesslerio_academic-deep-research

Files

zlei9 aacaa82c27 Initial commit with translated description

2026-03-29 10:21:28 +08:00

2.9 KiB

Raw Permalink Blame History

Deep Research Quick Reference

Invocation

/research or mention "deep research" / "exhaustive analysis"

Four Phases

Phase	User Action	Your Action	Key Output
1. Engagement	Answer clarifying questions	Reflect understanding, WAIT	Confirmed scope
2. Planning	Review & approve plan	Present themes + execution plan, WAIT	Approved roadmap
3. Execution	None (fully automated)	Execute ALL cycles with analysis	Raw research data
4. Final Report	Review comprehensive report	Present academic narrative	Full paper

Stop Points (Only Three)

✅ After clarifying questions (Phase 1)
✅ After research plan presentation (Phase 2)
✅ Final report delivery (Phase 4)

Tool Usage Sequence (Per Theme)

START: web_search for landscape (count=20)
ANALYZE: Synthesize findings, identify patterns and gaps
DIVE: web_fetch for depth on key sources
PROCESS: Synthesize new findings, challenge assumptions
REPEAT: Second cycle targeting identified gaps

Required Analysis After Every Tool Use

Connect new findings to previous results
Show evolution of understanding
Highlight pattern changes
Address contradictions
Build coherent narrative

Research Standards

Every conclusion cites multiple sources
All contradictions addressed
Uncertainties acknowledged
Limitations discussed
Gaps identified

Writing Style (Final Report)

Flowing narrative — paragraphs only, no lists
Academic but accessible
Evidence integrated naturally in prose
Progressive logical development
Smooth transitions between concepts

Prohibited in Final Report

Bullet points or numbered lists
Tables (convert to prose)
Isolated data without context
Section headers without narrative

Citation Standards (APA 7th)

Density: 1-2 citations per paragraph
Format: (Author, Year) in-text
References: Full APA with hanging indent
All claims cited — no exceptions

Confidence Annotations

[HIGH] — Multiple high-quality sources agree
[MEDIUM] — Limited or mixed evidence
[LOW] — Single source, needs verification
[SPECULATIVE] — Emerging area

Report Sections (Narrative Format)

Executive Summary — 2-3 paragraphs
Knowledge Development — evolution of understanding (6-8+ paragraphs)
Comprehensive Analysis — findings, patterns, contradictions, evidence (6-8+ paragraphs each subsection)
Practical Implications — applications, risks, future research (6-8+ paragraphs each subsection)
References — APA format, alphabetical
Appendices — optional

Critical Reminders

Stop only at three major points
Always analyze between tool usage
Show clear thinking progression
Connect findings explicitly
Build coherent narrative throughout
No shortcuts or rushed analysis