Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
jakevin 4de1b42ab7 chore(convention): retire listing↔detail id pairing CI gate, keep advisory (#1316)
PR #1297 introduced a CI gate that fails when a site has both a listing
and a detail command but the listing rows don't carry an id-shaped column.
The gate came with a 10-entry EXEMPT map (topic-string trending,
profile-attribute rows, UI-only sessions, ...) where each exemption
recorded a "why this listing legitimately doesn't pair" reason.

By the same filter that closed PR #1311 (write-without-delete-pair gate):

  Is "listing should pair with detail" a *permanent* anti-pattern, or
  case-by-case business judgment?

It's case-by-case. Topic-string listings and profile-attribute rows
genuinely don't pair with a detail command. The fact that we needed an
EXEMPT map with 10 entries and individual reason strings is the smell —
it's not the rule winning, it's the rule failing. Forcing every adapter
PR to either add an id column or file an exemption was a higher cognitive
cost than the silent-loss bugs the rule actually catches.

Changes:

- .github/workflows/ci.yml — drop the "Check listing↔detail id pairing"
  step. Other gates (silent-column-drop, typed-error-lint) stay in place.
- package.json — rename the script from `check:listing-id-pairing` to
  `advise:listing-id-pairing` to make the advisory nature explicit.
- scripts/check-listing-id-pairing.mjs — drop the `--strict` flag and the
  EXEMPT map. The script now always exits 0 and prints an advisory report
  of listings that don't carry an id-shaped column. Reviewers/authors use
  it as guidance, not a gate.
- docs/conventions/listing-detail-id-pairing.md — rewrite from "MUST" to
  "soft convention". Adds an explicit "why advisory, not a gate" section
  that lists the legitimate non-pairing categories so future readers know
  the rule's boundary.
- docs/developer/ts-adapter.md — match the advisory tone in the
  adapter-author guidance.

The doc, the script, and the column patterns table all stay — agents and
adapter authors can still consult them. What's gone is the CI failure and
the per-PR exempt-list maintenance burden.

Net diff: -34 lines (gate + EXEMPT map removed, advisory-tone doc adds
a small "why advisory" section).
2026-05-05 00:34:18 +08:00
jakevin 5ad0b81d92 ci: gate new typed error lint violations
Adds a baseline CI gate for convention-audit typed-error lint findings. Also refreshes the silent-column-drop baseline for dianping changes already on main.
2026-05-04 23:45:36 +08:00
jakevin 46d0f24f57 ci: gate new silent column drops
Adds a baseline CI gate for convention-audit silent-column-drop findings so CI rejects only newly introduced table-output loss.
2026-05-04 23:24:13 +08:00
jakevin 73dc1295e7 feat(cli): add convention audit command
Adds opencli convention-audit for batch convention scanning, with structured output, strict mode, docs, and startup isolation from local user/plugin discovery.
2026-05-04 22:52:42 +08:00
jakevin 0a85e73aa5 feat(convention): listing↔detail id pairing rule + CI gate (#1297)
* feat(convention): listing↔detail id pairing rule + CI gate

Adds a hard convention: when a site exposes both a listing-class command
(search / hot / top / recent / ...) and a detail-class command (read /
paper / article / view / ...), every listing row MUST surface an id-shaped
column whose value round-trips into the detail command. Without that, an
agent has no way to follow up on a listing row except re-searching by
title or scraping URLs out of band — both of which break the agent-native
contract.

What's in this PR

- docs/conventions/listing-detail-id-pairing.md — full rule, examples
  table, why-it-matters, what counts as id-shaped, exemption taxonomy,
  how to add an id column to a listing.
- scripts/check-listing-id-pairing.mjs — validator that reads
  cli-manifest.json, classifies each entry as listing / detail / other,
  and fails when a listing on a site that also has a read-detail command
  is missing an id-shaped column. Exemption allowlist records WHY each
  pair is exempt so future maintainers know what to verify.
- npm run check:listing-id-pairing — strict-mode wrapper.
- CI: new step in build job runs the validator after the manifest
  freshness check on Linux.
- docs/developer/ts-adapter.md — cross-link from the adapter authoring
  guide.
- docs/.vitepress/config.mts — sidebar entries for the new conventions
  section.

Fixes brought to zero violations

- 1688/search: add offer_id (already extracted, just surfaced)
- bluesky/user: add uri (AT URI round-trips into bluesky/thread)
- tieba/search: add id + url (thread_id already extracted)
- tieba/hot: add url (rows are topics, not threads — url is the
  best-effort round-trip handle, doc'd as such)

Exemptions (intentional, doc'd in EXEMPT map with rationale)

- nowcoder/hot, bluesky/trending, twitter/trending — listing rows are
  topic strings, not posts.
- lesswrong/user, reddit/user — rows are profile-attribute key/value
  pairs, addressed by the username arg.
- discord-app/search — desktop UI session, message ids not extractable.
- notion/search — Strategy.UI Quick Find, page ids not exposed in DOM.

Validator output after this PR: 32 sites scanned, 75 listings checked,
7 exempted, 0 violations.

* fix(convention): tighten listing id gate

* fix(convention): close url-derived id loophole
2026-05-04 20:54:14 +08:00