Initial commit with translated description
This commit is contained in:
89
competitor-analysis.md
Normal file
89
competitor-analysis.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
|
||||
# Competitor Analysis Frameworks
|
||||
|
||||
## Landscape Mapping
|
||||
|
||||
### Direct vs Indirect Competitors
|
||||
|
||||
| Type | Definition | Example (CRM) |
|
||||
|------|------------|---------------|
|
||||
| **Direct** | Same solution, same customer | Salesforce, HubSpot |
|
||||
| **Indirect** | Different solution, same problem | Spreadsheets, email |
|
||||
| **Potential** | Could enter your space | Microsoft, Google |
|
||||
|
||||
### Positioning Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
Map competitors on 2 axes relevant to your market:
|
||||
- Price vs Features
|
||||
- Enterprise vs SMB
|
||||
- Vertical vs Horizontal
|
||||
- Simple vs Complex
|
||||
|
||||
Find the white space — where are customers underserved?
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Mining
|
||||
|
||||
### Where to Look
|
||||
- **B2B SaaS:** G2, Capterra, TrustRadius
|
||||
- **Consumer Apps:** App Store, Play Store
|
||||
- **Physical Products:** Amazon, specialized forums
|
||||
- **Services:** Yelp, Google Reviews, industry forums
|
||||
|
||||
### What to Extract
|
||||
1. **Recurring complaints** — Same issue mentioned 10+ times = real problem
|
||||
2. **Feature requests** — What's missing from existing solutions?
|
||||
3. **Use case patterns** — How do different segments use the product?
|
||||
4. **Switching triggers** — Why did they leave their previous solution?
|
||||
|
||||
### Template: Complaint Frequency Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
| Complaint | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|
||||
|-----------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
|
||||
| Slow support | 47 mentions | 12 mentions | 89 mentions |
|
||||
| Confusing UI | 31 mentions | 56 mentions | 8 mentions |
|
||||
| Too expensive | 22 mentions | 3 mentions | 15 mentions |
|
||||
|
||||
## Competitive Intelligence Sources
|
||||
|
||||
### Public Information
|
||||
- **Financials:** 10-K, 10-Q (public companies), Crunchbase funding
|
||||
- **Strategy signals:** Job postings, press releases, conference talks
|
||||
- **Product changes:** Changelog, Product Hunt launches, app updates
|
||||
|
||||
### Ethical Intelligence Gathering
|
||||
✅ Public filings and press releases
|
||||
✅ Published pricing pages
|
||||
✅ User reviews and forums
|
||||
✅ Conference presentations
|
||||
✅ Open source contributions
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Fake customer inquiries
|
||||
❌ Social engineering employees
|
||||
❌ Scraping behind paywalls
|
||||
❌ Accessing internal documents
|
||||
|
||||
## Feature Comparison Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
### Template
|
||||
|
||||
| Feature | Your Product | Competitor A | Competitor B | Priority |
|
||||
|---------|-------------|-------------|-------------|----------|
|
||||
| Core feature 1 | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | Must-have |
|
||||
| Core feature 2 | 🔄 Building | ✅ | ✅ | Must-have |
|
||||
| Advanced feature | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | Nice-to-have |
|
||||
| Unique differentiator | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | Differentiator |
|
||||
|
||||
### How to Prioritize
|
||||
1. **Must-have:** Without this, customers won't consider you
|
||||
2. **Differentiator:** This is why they'll choose you over alternatives
|
||||
3. **Nice-to-have:** Adds value but doesn't drive purchase decisions
|
||||
|
||||
## Market Share Estimation
|
||||
|
||||
When no public data exists:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Traffic-based:** SimilarWeb, Alexa (if available)
|
||||
2. **Employee-based:** Revenue per employee benchmarks × headcount
|
||||
3. **Funding-based:** Typical revenue multiple for stage × funding raised
|
||||
4. **App download-based:** Download counts → conversion assumptions → paying users
|
||||
|
||||
**Always caveat estimates** with methodology and confidence level.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user