112 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
112 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
|
|
# Customer Validation
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Pre-Building Validation
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### The Mom Test Questions
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Avoid leading questions. Get facts about past behavior, not future intentions.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
❌ "Would you use an app that does X?"
|
||
|
|
✅ "How do you currently solve X?"
|
||
|
|
✅ "What happened last time you faced this problem?"
|
||
|
|
✅ "How much time/money did that cost you?"
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Jobs-to-be-Done Framework
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Structure: "When [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [outcome]."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Example: "When I'm preparing for a board meeting, I want to quickly assess competitor moves, so I can confidently answer questions about market positioning."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Finding Interview Subjects
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Cold outreach:**
|
||
|
|
- LinkedIn (filter by role + industry + company size)
|
||
|
|
- Twitter/X (search for people complaining about the problem)
|
||
|
|
- Industry Slack/Discord communities
|
||
|
|
- Relevant subreddits
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Warm introductions:**
|
||
|
|
- Ask existing network for intros
|
||
|
|
- Offer value exchange (share research findings)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Target:** 20-30 conversations before any confidence in patterns
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Validation Signals
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Strong Signals (Worth Building)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
| Signal | Weight |
|
||
|
|
|--------|--------|
|
||
|
|
| Customer gives you money (prepayment, LOI) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
|
||
|
|
| Customer spends significant time helping you | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
|
||
|
|
| Customer introduces you to others with same problem | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
|
||
|
|
| Customer describes workarounds they've built | ⭐⭐⭐ |
|
||
|
|
| Customer articulates the problem in your words | ⭐⭐⭐ |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Weak Signals (Keep Digging)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
| Signal | Reality |
|
||
|
|
|--------|---------|
|
||
|
|
| "I'd definitely use that" | Polite enthusiasm, not commitment |
|
||
|
|
| "Great idea!" | Compliment, not validation |
|
||
|
|
| Survey says 80% interested | Stated preference ≠ revealed preference |
|
||
|
|
| Lots of social media engagement | Attention ≠ willingness to pay |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Survey Design
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Question Types
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Screening questions:** Filter to your target audience
|
||
|
|
**Behavioral questions:** What have they done (past tense)
|
||
|
|
**Preference questions:** What would they choose (less reliable)
|
||
|
|
**Open-ended questions:** Capture language and unexpected insights
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Sample Size
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
| Confidence Level | Margin of Error | Required Sample |
|
||
|
|
|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------|
|
||
|
|
| 95% | ±5% | ~400 responses |
|
||
|
|
| 95% | ±10% | ~100 responses |
|
||
|
|
| 90% | ±10% | ~70 responses |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
For early validation, directional insights from 50-100 responses are often sufficient.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Common Survey Mistakes
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- Leading questions
|
||
|
|
- Double-barreled questions (asking two things at once)
|
||
|
|
- Social desirability bias (people say what sounds good)
|
||
|
|
- Too many questions (fatigue lowers quality)
|
||
|
|
- No screening for irrelevant respondents
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Pricing Research
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Van Westendorp Method
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Ask 4 questions:
|
||
|
|
1. At what price would this be **too expensive** to consider?
|
||
|
|
2. At what price would this be **expensive but worth considering**?
|
||
|
|
3. At what price would this be a **good deal**?
|
||
|
|
4. At what price would this be **so cheap you'd question quality**?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Plot results to find optimal price range.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Willingness-to-Pay Interview
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"If this product existed today and solved [specific problem], what would you pay for it?"
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Follow up: "What would make it worth 2x that price?"
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Competitive Pricing Analysis
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
| Competitor | Pricing Model | Entry Price | Mid-tier | Enterprise |
|
||
|
|
|------------|--------------|-------------|----------|------------|
|
||
|
|
| Competitor A | Per seat | $15/mo | $45/mo | Custom |
|
||
|
|
| Competitor B | Usage-based | $0.01/call | $0.008/call | Volume discounts |
|
||
|
|
| Competitor C | Flat rate | $99/mo | $299/mo | $999/mo |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Position your pricing based on:
|
||
|
|
- Value delivered vs alternatives
|
||
|
|
- Target customer segment
|
||
|
|
- Competitive reference points
|