Files
2026-05-09 02:56:24 +00:00
..
2026-05-09 02:56:24 +00:00
2026-05-09 02:56:24 +00:00
2026-05-09 02:56:24 +00:00
2026-05-09 02:56:24 +00:00

Editframe Evaluation Suite

This suite compares HyperFrames and Editframe on real execution paths, not only docs claims.

Current devbox run:

  • Report: reports/devbox-2026-04-30.html
  • Machine-readable results: reports/devbox-2026-04-30-results.json
  • Artifacts: artifacts/devbox-2026-04-30/

The eval intentionally separates:

  • default user path: the command a new user would run first
  • expert fallback path: lower-level API or codec workarounds
  • source/docs evidence: product capabilities not authenticated or exercised live
  • subjective quality: requires blind human judging and is not decided by this run

Current Devbox Conclusion

On ip-10-0-9-220, HyperFrames is more reliable for default local MP4 rendering. The published HyperFrames CLI rendered a valid 10s 1920x1080 H.264 MP4. The published Editframe CLI failed on its default AVC WebCodecs encoder config, but the same Editframe fixture rendered successfully through EF_RENDER.renderStreaming({ codec: "vp9" }).

This is not a final taste benchmark. It is a devbox execution/workflow eval over one precise-timing fixture.