Files

2.9 KiB

1. Update Archive Command Implementation

  • 1.1 Add skipSpecs option to the archive command options interface
  • 1.2 Modify the execute method to skip spec operations when flag is set
  • 1.3 Fix confirmation behavior: when user declines spec updates, proceed with archiving instead of cancelling
  • 1.4 Update console output to indicate when specs are being skipped (via flag or user choice)
  • 1.5 Ensure archive continues after declining spec updates

2. Update CLI Interface

  • 2.1 Add --skip-specs flag to the archive command definition
  • 2.2 Pass the flag value to the archive command execute method

3. Update Tests

  • 3.1 Add test case for archiving with --skip-specs flag
  • 3.2 Add test case for declining spec updates but continuing with archive
  • 3.3 Verify that spec updates are skipped when flag is used
  • 3.4 Verify that archive proceeds when user declines spec updates
  • 3.5 Ensure existing behavior remains unchanged when flag is not used

4. Update Documentation

  • 4.1 Update the cli-archive spec to document the new --skip-specs flag
  • 4.2 Document the new behavior when declining spec updates interactively

Implementation Notes

Key Design Decisions

  1. Non-blocking Confirmation Behavior: When users decline spec updates interactively, the archive operation continues rather than cancelling entirely. This was a critical UX improvement because:

    • Users may want to review specs separately before updating them
    • Archiving work shouldn't be blocked by spec review decisions
    • Maintains flexibility in the deployment workflow
  2. Flag Naming Convention: Chose --skip-specs for clarity and consistency:

    • Clearly indicates the action (skipping) and target (specs)
    • Follows kebab-case convention for CLI flags
    • Converts naturally to skipSpecs camelCase in code
  3. Console Messaging Strategy: Added explicit messages for all spec-skipping scenarios:

    • When flag is used: "Skipping spec updates (--skip-specs flag provided)."
    • When user declines: "Skipping spec updates. Proceeding with archive."
    • Ensures users always understand what's happening with their specs
  4. Test Coverage Approach: Created separate test cases for:

    • Flag-based skipping (explicit user choice via CLI)
    • Interactive declining (runtime user decision)
    • Both verify the same outcome but test different code paths

Use Cases Addressed

  • Infrastructure Changes: Changes to build tools, CI/CD, dependencies
  • Documentation Updates: README updates, comment improvements
  • Tooling Modifications: Developer tools, scripts, configuration files
  • Refactoring: Code improvements that don't change functionality/specs

Future Considerations

  • Could potentially auto-detect when changes don't include specs and suggest using the flag
  • May want to track which archives skipped spec updates for audit purposes