mirror of
https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec.git
synced 2026-09-14 20:16:53 +08:00
ecddffc22e
This commit enhances the validation logic for delta specs: - Delta section headers are now parsed case-insensitively (e.g., "Added Requirements" and "ADDED Requirements" both work) - Empty delta sections now produce clear error messages guiding users to add requirement entries - Specs with no delta headers at all now receive specific error messages - Added test coverage for case-insensitive delta header parsing
490 lines
14 KiB
TypeScript
490 lines
14 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, it, expect, beforeEach, afterEach } from 'vitest';
|
|
import { promises as fs } from 'fs';
|
|
import path from 'path';
|
|
import { Validator } from '../../src/core/validation/validator.js';
|
|
import {
|
|
ScenarioSchema,
|
|
RequirementSchema,
|
|
SpecSchema,
|
|
ChangeSchema,
|
|
DeltaSchema
|
|
} from '../../src/core/schemas/index.js';
|
|
|
|
describe('Validation Schemas', () => {
|
|
describe('ScenarioSchema', () => {
|
|
it('should validate a valid scenario', () => {
|
|
const scenario = {
|
|
rawText: 'Given a user is logged in\nWhen they click logout\nThen they are redirected to login page',
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const result = ScenarioSchema.safeParse(scenario);
|
|
expect(result.success).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should reject scenario with empty text', () => {
|
|
const scenario = {
|
|
rawText: '',
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const result = ScenarioSchema.safeParse(scenario);
|
|
expect(result.success).toBe(false);
|
|
if (!result.success) {
|
|
expect(result.error.issues[0].message).toBe('Scenario text cannot be empty');
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('RequirementSchema', () => {
|
|
it('should validate a valid requirement', () => {
|
|
const requirement = {
|
|
text: 'The system SHALL provide user authentication',
|
|
scenarios: [
|
|
{
|
|
rawText: 'Given a user with valid credentials\nWhen they submit the login form\nThen they are authenticated',
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const result = RequirementSchema.safeParse(requirement);
|
|
expect(result.success).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should reject requirement without SHALL or MUST', () => {
|
|
const requirement = {
|
|
text: 'The system provides user authentication',
|
|
scenarios: [
|
|
{
|
|
rawText: 'Given a user\nWhen they login\nThen authenticated',
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const result = RequirementSchema.safeParse(requirement);
|
|
expect(result.success).toBe(false);
|
|
if (!result.success) {
|
|
expect(result.error.issues[0].message).toBe('Requirement must contain SHALL or MUST keyword');
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should reject requirement without scenarios', () => {
|
|
const requirement = {
|
|
text: 'The system SHALL provide user authentication',
|
|
scenarios: [],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const result = RequirementSchema.safeParse(requirement);
|
|
expect(result.success).toBe(false);
|
|
if (!result.success) {
|
|
expect(result.error.issues[0].message).toBe('Requirement must have at least one scenario');
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('SpecSchema', () => {
|
|
it('should validate a valid spec', () => {
|
|
const spec = {
|
|
name: 'user-auth',
|
|
overview: 'This spec defines user authentication requirements',
|
|
requirements: [
|
|
{
|
|
text: 'The system SHALL provide user authentication',
|
|
scenarios: [
|
|
{
|
|
rawText: 'Given a user with valid credentials\nWhen they submit the login form\nThen they are authenticated',
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const result = SpecSchema.safeParse(spec);
|
|
expect(result.success).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should reject spec without requirements', () => {
|
|
const spec = {
|
|
name: 'user-auth',
|
|
overview: 'This spec defines user authentication requirements',
|
|
requirements: [],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const result = SpecSchema.safeParse(spec);
|
|
expect(result.success).toBe(false);
|
|
if (!result.success) {
|
|
expect(result.error.issues[0].message).toBe('Spec must have at least one requirement');
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('ChangeSchema', () => {
|
|
it('should validate a valid change', () => {
|
|
const change = {
|
|
name: 'add-user-auth',
|
|
why: 'We need user authentication to secure the application and protect user data',
|
|
whatChanges: 'Add authentication module with login and logout capabilities',
|
|
deltas: [
|
|
{
|
|
spec: 'user-auth',
|
|
operation: 'ADDED',
|
|
description: 'Add new user authentication spec',
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const result = ChangeSchema.safeParse(change);
|
|
expect(result.success).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should reject change with short why section', () => {
|
|
const change = {
|
|
name: 'add-user-auth',
|
|
why: 'Need auth',
|
|
whatChanges: 'Add authentication',
|
|
deltas: [
|
|
{
|
|
spec: 'user-auth',
|
|
operation: 'ADDED',
|
|
description: 'Add auth',
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const result = ChangeSchema.safeParse(change);
|
|
expect(result.success).toBe(false);
|
|
if (!result.success) {
|
|
expect(result.error.issues[0].message).toBe('Why section must be at least 50 characters');
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should warn about too many deltas', () => {
|
|
const deltas = Array.from({ length: 11 }, (_, i) => ({
|
|
spec: `spec-${i}`,
|
|
operation: 'ADDED' as const,
|
|
description: `Add spec ${i}`,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const change = {
|
|
name: 'massive-change',
|
|
why: 'This is a massive change that affects many parts of the system',
|
|
whatChanges: 'Update everything',
|
|
deltas,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const result = ChangeSchema.safeParse(change);
|
|
expect(result.success).toBe(false);
|
|
if (!result.success) {
|
|
expect(result.error.issues[0].message).toBe('Consider splitting changes with more than 10 deltas');
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('Validator', () => {
|
|
const testDir = path.join(process.cwd(), 'test-validation-tmp');
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(async () => {
|
|
await fs.mkdir(testDir, { recursive: true });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
afterEach(async () => {
|
|
await fs.rm(testDir, { recursive: true, force: true });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('validateSpec', () => {
|
|
it('should validate a valid spec file', async () => {
|
|
const specContent = `# User Authentication Spec
|
|
|
|
## Purpose
|
|
This specification defines the requirements for user authentication in the system.
|
|
|
|
## Requirements
|
|
|
|
### The system SHALL provide secure user authentication
|
|
The system SHALL provide secure user authentication mechanisms.
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario: Successful login
|
|
Given a user with valid credentials
|
|
When they submit the login form
|
|
Then they are authenticated and redirected to the dashboard
|
|
|
|
### The system SHALL handle invalid login attempts
|
|
The system SHALL gracefully handle incorrect credentials.
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario: Invalid credentials
|
|
Given a user with invalid credentials
|
|
When they submit the login form
|
|
Then they see an error message`;
|
|
|
|
const specPath = path.join(testDir, 'spec.md');
|
|
await fs.writeFile(specPath, specContent);
|
|
|
|
const validator = new Validator();
|
|
const report = await validator.validateSpec(specPath);
|
|
|
|
expect(report.valid).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(report.summary.errors).toBe(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should detect missing overview section', async () => {
|
|
const specContent = `# User Authentication Spec
|
|
|
|
## Requirements
|
|
|
|
### The system SHALL provide secure user authentication
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario: Login
|
|
Given a user
|
|
When they login
|
|
Then authenticated`;
|
|
|
|
const specPath = path.join(testDir, 'spec.md');
|
|
await fs.writeFile(specPath, specContent);
|
|
|
|
const validator = new Validator();
|
|
const report = await validator.validateSpec(specPath);
|
|
|
|
expect(report.valid).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(report.summary.errors).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
expect(report.issues.some(i => i.message.includes('Purpose'))).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('validateChange', () => {
|
|
it('should validate a valid change file', async () => {
|
|
const changeContent = `# Add User Authentication
|
|
|
|
## Why
|
|
We need to implement user authentication to secure the application and protect user data from unauthorized access.
|
|
|
|
## What Changes
|
|
- **user-auth:** Add new user authentication specification
|
|
- **api-endpoints:** Modify to include auth endpoints`;
|
|
|
|
const changePath = path.join(testDir, 'change.md');
|
|
await fs.writeFile(changePath, changeContent);
|
|
|
|
const validator = new Validator();
|
|
const report = await validator.validateChange(changePath);
|
|
|
|
expect(report.valid).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(report.summary.errors).toBe(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should detect missing why section', async () => {
|
|
const changeContent = `# Add User Authentication
|
|
|
|
## What Changes
|
|
- **user-auth:** Add new user authentication specification`;
|
|
|
|
const changePath = path.join(testDir, 'change.md');
|
|
await fs.writeFile(changePath, changeContent);
|
|
|
|
const validator = new Validator();
|
|
const report = await validator.validateChange(changePath);
|
|
|
|
expect(report.valid).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(report.summary.errors).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
expect(report.issues.some(i => i.message.includes('Why'))).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('strict mode', () => {
|
|
it('should fail on warnings in strict mode', async () => {
|
|
const specContent = `# Test Spec
|
|
|
|
## Purpose
|
|
Brief overview
|
|
|
|
## Requirements
|
|
|
|
### The system SHALL do something
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario: Test
|
|
Given test
|
|
When action
|
|
Then result`;
|
|
|
|
const specPath = path.join(testDir, 'spec.md');
|
|
await fs.writeFile(specPath, specContent);
|
|
|
|
const validator = new Validator(true); // strict mode
|
|
const report = await validator.validateSpec(specPath);
|
|
|
|
expect(report.valid).toBe(false); // Should fail due to brief overview warning
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should pass warnings in non-strict mode', async () => {
|
|
const specContent = `# Test Spec
|
|
|
|
## Purpose
|
|
Brief overview
|
|
|
|
## Requirements
|
|
|
|
### The system SHALL do something
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario: Test
|
|
Given test
|
|
When action
|
|
Then result`;
|
|
|
|
const specPath = path.join(testDir, 'spec.md');
|
|
await fs.writeFile(specPath, specContent);
|
|
|
|
const validator = new Validator(false); // non-strict mode
|
|
const report = await validator.validateSpec(specPath);
|
|
|
|
expect(report.valid).toBe(true); // Should pass despite warnings
|
|
expect(report.summary.warnings).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('validateChangeDeltaSpecs with metadata', () => {
|
|
it('should validate requirement with metadata before SHALL/MUST text', async () => {
|
|
const changeDir = path.join(testDir, 'test-change');
|
|
const specsDir = path.join(changeDir, 'specs', 'test-spec');
|
|
await fs.mkdir(specsDir, { recursive: true });
|
|
|
|
const deltaSpec = `# Test Spec
|
|
|
|
## ADDED Requirements
|
|
|
|
### Requirement: Circuit Breaker State Management SHALL be implemented
|
|
**ID**: REQ-CB-001
|
|
**Priority**: P1 (High)
|
|
|
|
The system MUST implement a circuit breaker with three states.
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario: Normal operation
|
|
**Given** the circuit breaker is in CLOSED state
|
|
**When** a request is made
|
|
**Then** the request is executed normally`;
|
|
|
|
const specPath = path.join(specsDir, 'spec.md');
|
|
await fs.writeFile(specPath, deltaSpec);
|
|
|
|
const validator = new Validator(true);
|
|
const report = await validator.validateChangeDeltaSpecs(changeDir);
|
|
|
|
expect(report.valid).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(report.summary.errors).toBe(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should validate requirement with SHALL in text but not in header', async () => {
|
|
const changeDir = path.join(testDir, 'test-change-2');
|
|
const specsDir = path.join(changeDir, 'specs', 'test-spec');
|
|
await fs.mkdir(specsDir, { recursive: true });
|
|
|
|
const deltaSpec = `# Test Spec
|
|
|
|
## ADDED Requirements
|
|
|
|
### Requirement: Error Handling
|
|
**ID**: REQ-ERR-001
|
|
**Priority**: P2
|
|
|
|
The system SHALL handle all errors gracefully.
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario: Error occurs
|
|
**Given** an error condition
|
|
**When** an error occurs
|
|
**Then** the error is logged and user is notified`;
|
|
|
|
const specPath = path.join(specsDir, 'spec.md');
|
|
await fs.writeFile(specPath, deltaSpec);
|
|
|
|
const validator = new Validator(true);
|
|
const report = await validator.validateChangeDeltaSpecs(changeDir);
|
|
|
|
expect(report.valid).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(report.summary.errors).toBe(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should fail when requirement text lacks SHALL/MUST', async () => {
|
|
const changeDir = path.join(testDir, 'test-change-3');
|
|
const specsDir = path.join(changeDir, 'specs', 'test-spec');
|
|
await fs.mkdir(specsDir, { recursive: true });
|
|
|
|
const deltaSpec = `# Test Spec
|
|
|
|
## ADDED Requirements
|
|
|
|
### Requirement: Logging Feature
|
|
**ID**: REQ-LOG-001
|
|
|
|
The system will log all events.
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario: Event occurs
|
|
**Given** an event
|
|
**When** it occurs
|
|
**Then** it is logged`;
|
|
|
|
const specPath = path.join(specsDir, 'spec.md');
|
|
await fs.writeFile(specPath, deltaSpec);
|
|
|
|
const validator = new Validator(true);
|
|
const report = await validator.validateChangeDeltaSpecs(changeDir);
|
|
|
|
expect(report.valid).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(report.summary.errors).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
expect(report.issues.some(i => i.message.includes('must contain SHALL or MUST'))).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should handle requirements without metadata fields', async () => {
|
|
const changeDir = path.join(testDir, 'test-change-4');
|
|
const specsDir = path.join(changeDir, 'specs', 'test-spec');
|
|
await fs.mkdir(specsDir, { recursive: true });
|
|
|
|
const deltaSpec = `# Test Spec
|
|
|
|
## ADDED Requirements
|
|
|
|
### Requirement: Simple Feature
|
|
The system SHALL implement this feature.
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario: Basic usage
|
|
**Given** a condition
|
|
**When** an action occurs
|
|
**Then** a result happens`;
|
|
|
|
const specPath = path.join(specsDir, 'spec.md');
|
|
await fs.writeFile(specPath, deltaSpec);
|
|
|
|
const validator = new Validator(true);
|
|
const report = await validator.validateChangeDeltaSpecs(changeDir);
|
|
|
|
expect(report.valid).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(report.summary.errors).toBe(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should treat delta headers case-insensitively', async () => {
|
|
const changeDir = path.join(testDir, 'test-change-mixed-case');
|
|
const specsDir = path.join(changeDir, 'specs', 'test-spec');
|
|
await fs.mkdir(specsDir, { recursive: true });
|
|
|
|
const deltaSpec = `# Test Spec
|
|
|
|
## Added Requirements
|
|
|
|
### Requirement: Mixed Case Handling
|
|
The system MUST support mixed case delta headers.
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario: Case insensitive parsing
|
|
**Given** a delta file with mixed case headers
|
|
**When** validation runs
|
|
**Then** the delta is detected`;
|
|
|
|
const specPath = path.join(specsDir, 'spec.md');
|
|
await fs.writeFile(specPath, deltaSpec);
|
|
|
|
const validator = new Validator(true);
|
|
const report = await validator.validateChangeDeltaSpecs(changeDir);
|
|
|
|
expect(report.valid).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(report.summary.errors).toBe(0);
|
|
expect(report.summary.warnings).toBe(0);
|
|
expect(report.summary.info).toBe(0);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|