Files
2026-07-10 02:19:48 +00:00

104 lines
5.0 KiB
YAML

name: coverage-analysis
description: Evaluates the dotnet-test/coverage-analysis skill
type: capability
config:
timeout: 6m
stimuli:
- name: Project-wide coverage analysis with existing Cobertura data
prompt: Run coverage analysis on this project. Coverage data is already in TestResults/coverage.cobertura.xml.
environment:
files:
- src: fixtures/shared/ContosoUniversity.sln
dest: ContosoUniversity.sln
- src: fixtures/shared/ContosoUniversity/ContosoUniversity.csproj
dest: ContosoUniversity/ContosoUniversity.csproj
- src: fixtures/shared/ContosoUniversity/StudentService.cs
dest: ContosoUniversity/StudentService.cs
- src: fixtures/shared/ContosoUniversity.UnitTests/ContosoUniversity.UnitTests.csproj
dest: ContosoUniversity.UnitTests/ContosoUniversity.UnitTests.csproj
- src: fixtures/shared/ContosoUniversity.UnitTests/StudentServiceTests.cs
dest: ContosoUniversity.UnitTests/StudentServiceTests.cs
- src: fixtures/partial-coverage/coverage.cobertura.xml
dest: TestResults/coverage.cobertura.xml
graders:
- type: output-matches
config:
pattern: CRAP|crap
- type: output-matches
config:
pattern: CalculateGpa|Calculate_?Gpa
- type: output-matches
config:
pattern: hotspot|risk|coverage
- type: prompt
rubric:
- Discovers the solution and identifies the test project
- Parses the existing Cobertura XML to extract per-method coverage data
- Calculates CRAP scores and produces a sorted risk hotspot table
- Identifies CalculateGpa as the highest-risk method (high complexity, low coverage)
- Provides actionable recommendations for the riskiest methods
- Generates or displays a coverage analysis report
- name: Run coverage from scratch without existing data
prompt: Analyze code coverage and risk hotspots for this project. I haven't run any coverage yet.
environment:
files:
- src: fixtures/shared/ContosoUniversity.sln
dest: ContosoUniversity.sln
- src: fixtures/shared/ContosoUniversity/ContosoUniversity.csproj
dest: ContosoUniversity/ContosoUniversity.csproj
- src: fixtures/shared/ContosoUniversity/StudentService.cs
dest: ContosoUniversity/StudentService.cs
- src: fixtures/shared/ContosoUniversity.UnitTests/ContosoUniversity.UnitTests.csproj
dest: ContosoUniversity.UnitTests/ContosoUniversity.UnitTests.csproj
- src: fixtures/shared/ContosoUniversity.UnitTests/StudentServiceTests.cs
dest: ContosoUniversity.UnitTests/StudentServiceTests.cs
graders:
- type: output-matches
config:
pattern: dotnet test
- type: output-matches
config:
pattern: coverage
- type: output-matches
config:
pattern: CRAP|crap|hotspot|risk
- type: prompt
rubric:
- Detects the coverage provider from the test project .csproj (coverlet.collector)
- Runs dotnet test with coverage collection to generate Cobertura XML
- Extracts per-method coverage from the generated data
- Computes CRAP scores and identifies risk hotspots
- Identifies CalculateGpa as untested or highest risk due to complexity with no coverage
- Provides prioritized recommendations for where to add tests
- name: Coverage plateau diagnosis
prompt: My coverage is stuck at 75% and I can't get it higher. What's blocking me? Coverage data is in
TestResults/coverage.cobertura.xml.
environment:
files:
- src: fixtures/shared/ContosoUniversity.sln
dest: ContosoUniversity.sln
- src: fixtures/shared/ContosoUniversity/ContosoUniversity.csproj
dest: ContosoUniversity/ContosoUniversity.csproj
- src: fixtures/shared/ContosoUniversity/StudentService.cs
dest: ContosoUniversity/StudentService.cs
- src: fixtures/shared/ContosoUniversity.UnitTests/ContosoUniversity.UnitTests.csproj
dest: ContosoUniversity.UnitTests/ContosoUniversity.UnitTests.csproj
- src: fixtures/shared/ContosoUniversity.UnitTests/StudentServiceTests.cs
dest: ContosoUniversity.UnitTests/StudentServiceTests.cs
- src: fixtures/plateau/coverage.cobertura.xml
dest: TestResults/coverage.cobertura.xml
graders:
- type: output-matches
config:
pattern: CalculateGpa|Calculate_?Gpa
- type: output-matches
config:
pattern: 0%|uncovered|untested|no coverage
- type: prompt
rubric:
- Identifies CalculateGpa as the method blocking coverage improvement (0% coverage, highest complexity)
- Explains that 3 of 4 methods are well-covered but CalculateGpa drags down the average
- Quantifies the impact — covering CalculateGpa would raise overall coverage significantly
- Uses CRAP scores to distinguish the risky gap (CalculateGpa) from trivial ones
- Provides specific test recommendations for the uncovered method