Files
YuliiaKovalova da5e63e878 [dotnet-msbuild] Fix AP-13/AP-14 false positives and add source-vs-packed layout guidance (#687)
* [dotnet-msbuild] Fix AP-13/AP-14 false positives and add source-vs-packed layout guidance

The msbuild-quality-review run on microsoft/testfx surfaced two confidently-stated
false positives that the maintainer rightly pushed back on:

1. The reviewer claimed unguarded `<Import>` forwarders in MSTest's NuGet
   `build/<tfm>/` folders point at non-existent paths under `buildTransitive/<tfm>/`.
   In reality those folders are produced at pack time by the `.nuspec` `<file
   target="...">` mappings, so the forwarders resolve correctly in every restored
   package.

2. The reviewer flagged backslashes in `<Import Project="...\...\...">` as a
   cross-platform 🔴 error. MSBuild's evaluator normalizes `\` to `/` on
   Unix-like systems via `FileUtilities.MaybeAdjustFilePath` /
   `ConvertToUnixSlashes` before resolving the path, so existing backslash-style
   imports work everywhere — confirmed by years of shipping MSTest to Linux/macOS
   users.

This change updates the rubric so the same false positives don't recur across
every consumer of the dotnet-msbuild plugin:

* `msbuild-antipatterns/SKILL.md` AP-13 — adds an explicit "NuGet package
  forwarders" exception and tells reviewers to consult `.nuspec` /
  `<PackagePath>` before flagging.
* `msbuild-antipatterns/SKILL.md` AP-14 — rewritten to distinguish where
  backslashes are a real bug (raw `<Exec>` shell strings, CDATA, non-MSBuild
  consumers — keep 🔴) from where they're only style (`<Import>` and other
  evaluator-routed paths — 🔵 with a cite to the MSBuild source).
* `extension-points/SKILL.md` — adds a "Source Tree vs Packed Layout" section
  documenting the three packaging mechanisms (.nuspec `<file>` mappings, csproj
  `<PackagePath>` metadata, SDK pack conventions) that legitimately reshape the
  layout, with the cross-check procedure reviewers must run before flagging
  "missing-file" imports.
* `agents/msbuild-code-review.agent.md` — Discovery now records the projected
  packed layout; Category 4 references the new AP-13/AP-14 nuances; new
  "Veracity gate" step downgrades or drops 🔴 findings that would imply
  currently-shipping CI is broken.

No fixtures change: the `tests/dotnet-msbuild/msbuild-antipatterns/eval.yaml`
rubric does not enumerate AP-13/AP-14 by id, and the F#-specific scenarios are
unaffected. Markdownlint passes on all edited files.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Address PR review feedback

- extension-points: rewrite .nuspec example so the source file is genuinely shared (single buildTransitive/common/MyAdapter.props fan-out instead of three already-per-TFM sources); clarify <file target=> folder-vs-rename semantics.
- extension-points: replace semicolon-list PackagePath example with the unambiguous multi-<None> form, and note in prose that semicolon syntax is also supported. Avoids reader confusion noted in review.
- msbuild-antipatterns AP-13 cross-check: align search scope with extension-points (project directory AND any parent directory) so reviewers don't miss shared mono-repo nuspecs.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* AP-13: drop ../ link to extension-points to satisfy skill-validator

Skill-validator rejects file references that traverse out of the skill directory (parent-directory traversal). Replace the markdown link with a plain-text reference to the dotnet-msbuild/extension-points skill — the prose is still discoverable to humans and to the agent that loads the plugin, but no longer trips the validator.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Address second round of PR review feedback

- AP-13: replace <tfm> placeholders inside XML attribute strings with concrete TFM examples (net8.0) so the snippets are valid copy-pasteable XML.
- AP-13 & extension-points: bound the .nuspec search to project directory + IMMEDIATE parent only (no unbounded walking); wording now identical in both docs.
- AP-14: add explicit text severity next to severity emoji (🔴 Error / 🔵 Style) for accessibility — screen readers and plain-text copies now convey severity without relying on color/emoji rendering.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-25 16:08:01 +00:00
..