Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Amaury Levé b9db51de9d Add TUnit-focused eval scenarios for dotnet-test-frameworks (#699)
* Add TUnit-focused eval scenarios for dotnet-test-frameworks

Adds 5 new evaluation scenarios and tightens 2 existing scenarios to
exercise the expanded TUnit coverage in dotnet-test-frameworks/SKILL.md
(see #677).

New scenarios:
- Convert cross-framework assertions to TUnit syntax (await / IsEqualTo /
  IsTrue / IsNull / IsAssignableTo / Contains / Throws<T>)
- Diagnose silently-passing TUnit test with missing await (debugging
  mystery framed without naming the pitfall)
- Refactor TUnit try/catch to native exception assertion (Throws<T>()
  / ThrowsExactly<T>() / WithMessage)
- TUnit lifecycle hooks at test / class / assembly / session scope
- TUnit skip mechanisms — attribute, assembly-wide [assembly: Skip],
  and dynamic Skip.Test(...)

Updated scenarios:
- Identify TUnit framework: rubric now distinguishes [ClassDataSource]
  as a fixture/data source rather than a class marker (TUnit classes
  are convention-based, like xUnit)
- Identify integration tests: adds a TUnit Project D using live
  SqlConnection and requires recommending [Category("Integration")] for
  TUnit

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Mirror TUnit eval scenarios into Vally spec

Apply the same updated and new scenarios as in eval.yaml to the parallel

eval.vally.yaml so both pipelines exercise the new TUnit-focused checks.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Amaury Levé <amauryleve@github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-28 12:30:50 +00:00
Aditya Mandaleeka 9433a31e67 Initial port of evals to Vally (#615) 2026-05-06 10:11:45 -07:00
Amaury Levé 1b105d1940 Fix dotnet-test-frameworks skill activation for evaluations (#580)
* Fix dotnet-test-frameworks skill activation for evaluations

The skill had user-invocable: false and a description saying 'DO NOT USE
directly', which prevented the model from activating it during evaluation.
All 6 eval scenarios default to expect_activation: true, causing
SkillNotActivated failures on CI.

- Remove user-invocable: false from both dotnet-test and experimental copies
- Rewrite description with activation keywords matching eval prompts
  (assertion mapping, framework identification, skip annotations, exception
  assertions, lifecycle conversion, integration test markers)
- Preserve note that other analysis skills also load this as reference data

* Restore user-invocable: false, fix cross-refs, add expect_activation: false

Address review comment: remove exp-* skill references from dotnet-test-
frameworks description since those skills reference exp-dotnet-test-
frameworks instead.

Optimize eval results: this reference data skill's content is knowledge
the model already has (baseline scores 5.0/5 on most scenarios). Direct
activation adds token/time overhead without quality improvement:
- Restore user-invocable: false (correct for reference data skill)
- Shorten description to not trigger activation
- Add expect_activation: false to all 6 scenarios

The skill's value is realized when loaded by consumer skills (e.g.
test-anti-patterns), not via direct user queries.
2026-04-23 16:24:48 +02:00
Amaury Levé 96489b425e eval(dotnet-test): add evaluations for dotnet-test-frameworks skill (#563) 2026-04-20 19:39:40 +00:00