Files
Dani 054c0e56e9 fix(commands): Remove deprecated 'model: sonnet' field from 142 command files
Removed the deprecated 'model: sonnet' field from command frontmatter to fix
compatibility issues with Claude Code. Commands will now inherit the model from
the active conversation instead of using a hardcoded deprecated model identifier.

Changes:
- Removed 'model: sonnet' from 142 command files across all categories
- Commands now use default model inheritance behavior
- Preserved 'model: claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929' in gemini-review.md (valid model)
- 67 commands without model field remain unchanged

This resolves the "model: sonnet not found" error reported in GitHub issues
and aligns with Claude Code's recommended practice of letting commands inherit
the conversation model.

Affected categories:
- Database/Supabase commands (8 files)
- Documentation commands (8 files)
- Deployment commands (11 files)
- Setup commands (14 files)
- Performance commands (8 files)
- Team commands (14 files)
- Security commands (6 files)
- NextJS/Vercel commands (10 files)
- Sync commands (14 files)
- And more across other categories

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-10-21 10:08:58 -04:00

2.2 KiB

allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash argument-hint: [analysis-type] | --bias-detection | --scenario-testing | --process-optimization | --outcome-tracking description: Analyze team decision quality with bias detection, scenario testing, and process improvement recommendations

Decision Quality Analyzer

Analyze and improve team decision-making quality with comprehensive bias detection: $ARGUMENTS

Current Decision Context

  • Team size: !git log --format='%ae' --since='1 month ago' | sort -u | wc -l active contributors
  • Recent decisions: Major decisions from recent commits and discussions
  • Decision frequency: Pattern analysis of decision-making cadence
  • Process maturity: Current decision frameworks and methodologies in use

Task

Execute comprehensive decision quality analysis with bias mitigation and process optimization:

Analysis Type: Use $ARGUMENTS for bias detection, scenario testing, process optimization, or outcome tracking analysis

Decision Quality Framework:

  1. Process Quality Assessment - Evaluate information gathering, stakeholder involvement, alternative generation, analysis rigor
  2. Bias Detection Analysis - Identify confirmation bias, anchoring bias, groupthink, authority bias, planning fallacy patterns
  3. Outcome Evaluation - Assess goal achievement, unintended consequences, stakeholder satisfaction, sustainability measures
  4. Scenario Testing - Historical decision analysis, hypothetical scenario testing, stress test scenarios, learning extraction
  5. Timing Analysis - Decision speed evaluation, information timing optimization, implementation coordination, review scheduling
  6. Learning Integration - Knowledge capture, institutional learning, process improvement, capability building

Advanced Features: Multi-dimensional quality metrics, systematic bias mitigation strategies, decision simulation testing, predictive outcome modeling.

Process Optimization: Stakeholder engagement frameworks, analytical tool integration, communication enhancement, cultural development strategies.

Output: Comprehensive decision quality assessment with specific bias mitigation strategies, process improvements, and implementation roadmap.