bearer_for ended with a blanket `rescue StandardError => nil` plus `return nil if status >= 400`. Now that bearer_for ALWAYS performs the /token exchange (even when a token is present), that swallow masked real failures: a non-2xx /token response, a malformed JSON body, or a transport error all collapsed to nil, after which manifest_exists issued the manifest HEAD anonymously (no Authorization). That silently violated manifest_exists's documented raise-on-transport/5xx contract and conflated "no token supplied" with "supplied token failed to exchange". bearer_for now: - raises GHCR::Error on a >=400 /token response WHEN a token was supplied (token absent still returns nil — the legitimate anonymous-public fallback); - raises GHCR::Error on JSON::ParserError for an unparseable 200 body; - no longer swallows StandardError, so transport exceptions (Errno::ECONNREFUSED, Net::ReadTimeout, ...) propagate. Call-site enumeration (bearer_for is called only by manifest_exists and resolve_digest): - manifest_exists: documents "Raises GHCR::Error on 5xx or transport failure", so a raised exchange error is consistent with — and strengthens — its own contract. Assumption holds. - resolve_digest: already raises GHCR::Error on its own manifest HEAD >=400 and does not rescue bearer_for, so a raised exchange error propagates exactly as its other failures do. Assumption holds. Neither caller is broken by bearer_for raising; both already propagate GHCR::Error to their callers. Tests: add 3 red-green cases in test_ghcr_bearer.rb (token-present 401 raises; token-present malformed body raises; token-present exchange failure issues NO anonymous manifest HEAD). The existing manifest_exists/digest fakes were only green because the old swallow masked the fake's "no fake response" error — they never modeled the mandatory /token exchange; added a successful /token fake to each so they exercise the real path. Renumbered the snapshot-ivar-lint allowlist (+13 lines) to track the bin/railway line drift.
bin/railway
Single-file Ruby tooling for showcase Railway operations.
Why
The Showcase platform lives on Railway across two environments (staging and
production). Day-to-day operations — promoting staging to production, pinning
services to immutable image digests, rolling a bad deploy back, auditing drift
between envs — used to require ad-hoc shell + GraphQL recipes. bin/railway
makes those operations first-class CLI subcommands with consistent flags,
exit codes, and production protection.
Install
None. Requires system Ruby 3.x (stdlib only — no Bundler, no Gemfile).
showcase/bin/railway --help
Auth
The tool reads a Railway API token from (in order):
RAILWAY_TOKENenvironment variable~/.railway/config.json(thetokenfield, oruser.token)
It never invokes railway login, railway logout, or op. If neither source
yields a token, it exits with code 2 and a clear error.
For GHCR digest resolution (resolve-digest, pin), set GHCR_TOKEN if you
need to read private packages; public packages work anonymously via the GHCR
/token endpoint.
Subcommands
| Subcommand | Purpose |
|---|---|
snapshot |
Capture an env's services + config into a YAML snapshot. |
restore |
Restore an env to a snapshot (force-redeploy each service). |
rollback |
Roll a single service back one deploy (or to a specific deployment id with --to). |
rollback-commit |
Restore an env to the snapshot committed at a given git SHA. |
promote |
Promote staging digests to production with prechecks. |
pin |
Pin a service to a specific image digest. |
env-diff |
Diff two envs; exits 1 on drift. |
resolve-digest |
Resolve an image tag (e.g. :latest) to its sha256: digest. |
lint-prod |
CI gate (advisory): warn if any prod service is not digest-pinned. --exit-zero for advisory mode, --format json for machine-readable output. |
Run any subcommand with --help for full flag list.
Production protection
Every subcommand that mutates state requires both:
--yesflag, and- typed confirmation of the literal string
productionon stdin
…before any production mutation runs. --non-interactive skips the prompt
but still requires --yes. There is no way to mutate production without an
explicit acknowledgement.
Exit codes
| Code | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 0 | Clean / success |
| 1 | Drift detected, findings reported, or promote refused for policy reasons |
| 2 | Error (auth, network, GraphQL schema, refused confirmation, etc.) |
Worked example: promote staging → production
# 1. Audit drift first (read-only).
showcase/bin/railway env-diff staging production
# DRIFT: 3 finding(s)
# service showcase-shell: digest sha256:abc != sha256:def
# ...
# 2. Lint prod to confirm baseline is pinned.
showcase/bin/railway lint-prod
# OK: all production services digest-pinned.
# 3. Capture a "before" snapshot in case we need to roll back.
showcase/bin/railway snapshot --env production --output before-promote.yaml
# 4. Run the promote with prechecks. Production confirmation prompt fires here.
showcase/bin/railway promote --yes
# Type 'production' to confirm promote: production
# promoted showcase-shell -> ghcr.io/copilotkit/showcase-shell@sha256:def...
# ...
# If anything goes sideways:
showcase/bin/railway restore --env production --snapshot before-promote.yaml --yes
CI integration
.github/workflows/showcase_lint_prod.yml runs bin/railway lint-prod on
every PR that touches showcase/**.
Currently advisory — the workflow passes --exit-zero, so findings print
to the job log but do not fail the PR. This lets us soak the check against
real production state before turning it into a hard gate. Once we've built
confidence the findings are clean, remove --exit-zero from the workflow to
flip the check to enforcing (exit 1 on drift).
Long-term contract: every production service must be pinned to an immutable
ghcr.io/...@sha256:... digest, and the lint job will fail any PR that
drifts away from that.
Visibility surfaces
Two human-facing surfaces render the audit result every run:
- Workflow step summary — the workflow writes a structured markdown
block to
$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARYso the audit shows at the top of every run page (every event:pull_request,push,workflow_dispatch). - Sticky PR comment — on
pull_requestevents, the workflow posts (or updates) a single comment per PR. The comment is keyed by the HTML marker<!-- lint-prod-sticky-comment -->so re-runs update the same comment instead of creating duplicates.
Both surfaces show the same content: a one-line status, a table of the
unpinned services (only — pinned services are not enumerated), and a
Pacific-time run timestamp with the finding count.
Machine-readable output
lint-prod --format json emits:
{
"services": [
{ "name": "...", "source": "...", "status": "pinned|mutable-tag" }
],
"findings": 3,
"timestamp": "2026-05-27T18:00:00Z"
}
The CI workflow uses this shape to render the step summary and PR comment.
The findings count is also written to $GITHUB_OUTPUT so downstream jobs
(e.g. a future Slack alert step) can compare against prior runs.
Tests
ruby showcase/bin/spec/all_tests.rb
Tests are minitest (stdlib). They cover:
- argv parsing per subcommand
- snapshot YAML round-trip
- GHCR digest-resolution decision tree (mocked HTTP)
- production-protection prompt behavior
No Railway / GHCR network calls are made during tests.