Three names for one value were live in CopilotKit's own documentation, and following the wrong one with a CLI-provisioned project yields an undefined key: - `INTELLIGENCE_API_KEY` — what `copilotkit project select` writes, used by all 34 integration examples and the docs site. - `COPILOTKIT_INTELLIGENCE_API_KEY` — the seven Channels package READMEs and the packaged skills. Nothing ever read it. - `COPILOTKIT_API_KEY` — the Slack and Teams examples, and the TSDoc on `CopilotKitIntelligence` itself, which is what an IDE shows on hover. `INTELLIGENCE_API_KEY` wins, because it is the name the CLI provisions and changing it would break every scaffolded project in the wild. `COPILOTKIT_INTELLIGENCE_API_KEY` is retired outright — no code read it. `COPILOTKIT_API_KEY` stays readable as a deprecated alias in the two examples that consume it, so an existing `.env` keeps working, and is documented as deprecated everywhere it appears. The skills reference also documented `organizationId`, sourced from a fourth and fifth env name, as a `CopilotKitIntelligence` option. It is not one: `CopilotKitIntelligenceConfig` has no such field, so the copy-pasteable sample it appeared in would not compile. Removed from the samples, and the prose that told readers to fetch a value for it corrected. The Intelligence wiring itself was published only inside `node_modules/@copilotkit/runtime/skills/`, and the only docs pages showing `CopilotKitIntelligence` were the two Channels frontends — so a developer on the plain web path had no page to reach it from. Adds `/premium/connect-your-runtime`, which covers the wiring, how to confirm the credential is actually consumed, and the self-hosted two-URL rule. `scripts/validate-intelligence-env-names.ts` keeps this from drifting back. It runs unfiltered in CI on purpose: the two workflows that would otherwise cover it filter paths, and static/quality ignores `examples/**` — exactly where the deprecated alias lives.
7.6 KiB
Intelligence Setup Guide
This guide shows how to set up CopilotKit Intelligence: durable thread storage plus a websocket transport for realtime events.
Intelligence is designed to feel like a small runtime configuration change, not a separate product integration. You provide an Intelligence platform client to the runtime, and the rest of the stack switches from plain SSE mode into Intelligence mode automatically.
What Changes in Intelligence Mode
graph TB
subgraph Frontend
App["React / Angular / Vanilla"]
Core["CopilotKitCore"]
Proxy["ProxiedCopilotRuntimeAgent"]
IA["IntelligenceAgent<br/><i>chosen after /info</i>"]
end
subgraph Your Server
RT["CopilotRuntime"]
CPK-I["CopilotKitIntelligence"]
Runner["IntelligenceAgentRunner"]
end
subgraph Intelligence
API["Thread API<br/><i>durable storage</i>"]
WS["Realtime WebSocket"]
end
App --> Core
Core --> Proxy
Proxy -->|info handshake| RT
RT --> CPK-I
CPK-I --> API
RT --> Runner
Runner --> WS
Proxy --> IA
IA -->|REST bootstrap| RT
IA -->|WebSocket events| WS
SSE Mode vs Intelligence Mode
| Mode | Thread storage | Realtime transport | /info reports |
|---|---|---|---|
| SSE | Ephemeral unless your runner persists state | SSE | mode: "sse" |
| Intelligence | Durable thread APIs | WebSocket | mode: "intelligence" + intelligence.wsUrl |
The important design rule is:
- The runtime decides the mode.
- The client waits for
/infobefore choosing the concrete remote agent implementation. - The developer only opts in by providing
intelligence.
Minimal Runtime Setup
1. Install runtime packages
npm install @copilotkit/runtime
2. Create the Intelligence platform client
import { CopilotKitIntelligence } from "@copilotkit/runtime";
const intelligence = new CopilotKitIntelligence({
apiKey: process.env.INTELLIGENCE_API_KEY!,
organizationId: process.env.COPILOTKIT_INTELLIGENCE_ORGANIZATION_ID!,
});
apiUrl and wsUrl default to the managed platform
(https://api.intelligence.copilotkit.ai and
wss://realtime.intelligence.copilotkit.ai). To target a non-production or
self-hosted deployment, override both — they are separate hosts, so neither
derives from the other, and setting one alone leaves the other plane on the
managed platform. Pass bare bases: the client appends /api/... and the socket
layer appends /runner or /client itself.
const intelligence = new CopilotKitIntelligence({
apiKey: process.env.INTELLIGENCE_API_KEY!,
organizationId: process.env.COPILOTKIT_INTELLIGENCE_ORGANIZATION_ID!,
apiUrl: "https://api.your-intelligence-host",
wsUrl: "wss://realtime.your-intelligence-host",
});
3. Pass it to CopilotRuntime
import express from "express";
import { CopilotRuntime } from "@copilotkit/runtime";
import { createCopilotEndpointExpress } from "@copilotkit/runtime/express";
const app = express();
const runtime = new CopilotRuntime({
agents: {
default: myAgent,
},
intelligence,
});
app.use(
"/api/copilotkit",
createCopilotEndpointExpress({
runtime,
basePath: "/",
}),
);
That is the mode switch. You do not separately configure Intelligence handlers in the endpoint layer. The runtime selects them.
What CopilotRuntime Does For You
When intelligence is present, CopilotRuntime:
- switches its mode from
"sse"to"intelligence" - uses the Intelligence handler path for
run,connect, andthreads - auto-configures the Intelligence runner from
intelligence.wsUrl - reports Intelligence metadata from
/info
Example /info response:
{
"version": "1.x.x",
"mode": "intelligence",
"agents": {
"default": {
"name": "default",
"description": "My agent",
"className": "BuiltInAgent"
}
},
"audioFileTranscriptionEnabled": false,
"a2uiEnabled": false,
"intelligence": {
"wsUrl": "wss://your-intelligence-host/socket"
}
}
The frontend uses that response to decide whether to keep using the HTTP/SSE path or switch to the Intelligence websocket path.
Frontend Behavior
You do not configure a special provider flag for Intelligence.
This stays the same:
import { CopilotKitProvider, CopilotChat } from "@copilotkit/react-core/v2";
export function App() {
return (
<CopilotKitProvider runtimeUrl="/api/copilotkit">
<CopilotChat />
</CopilotKitProvider>
);
}
What changes under the hood:
- The provider connects to the runtime as usual.
CopilotKitCorefetches/info.ProxiedCopilotRuntimeAgentwaits until the runtime reports its mode.- If the mode is:
"sse": normal HTTP/SSE behavior continues."intelligence": the proxy usesIntelligenceAgentand the runtime-provided websocket URL.
This is why the runtime owns the mode decision instead of the frontend guessing from config.
Durable Threads
Intelligence mode adds thread APIs on the runtime:
| Route | Method | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
/threads |
GET | List durable threads |
/threads/subscribe |
POST | Get credentials for realtime updates |
/threads/:threadId |
PATCH | Update thread metadata |
/threads/:threadId/archive |
POST | Archive a thread |
/threads/:threadId |
DELETE | Delete a thread |
These routes are Intelligence-only.
In SSE mode they should reject with an explicit error, because SSE runtimes do not have the durable thread backend required to satisfy them.
How Agent Runs Work in Intelligence Mode
sequenceDiagram
participant Client as Frontend
participant Runtime as CopilotRuntime
participant CPK-I as CopilotKitIntelligence
participant WS as Intelligence WebSocket
Client->>Runtime: GET /info
Runtime-->>Client: { mode: "intelligence", wsUrl: ... }
Client->>Runtime: POST /agent/default/run
Runtime->>CPK-I: ensure thread exists + acquire lock
CPK-I-->>Runtime: join token / join code
Runtime-->>Client: bootstrap response
Client->>WS: join thread channel
WS-->>Client: AG-UI events in realtime
The runtime is still the contract boundary the frontend talks to. Intelligence is not exposed as a separate frontend integration surface.
Local Agents vs Runtime-Discovered Agents
Local or self-managed agents still matter in Intelligence mode.
The intended precedence is:
- local/self-managed agents
- runtime-discovered remote agents
That lets application code override a runtime-reported agent with a local implementation for development, testing, or custom routing behavior.
Recommended Mental Model
Think of Intelligence as a runtime capability, not a second transport API developers need to learn.
CopilotKitIntelligenceconfigures the runtime's Intelligence backend.CopilotRuntimeexposes that capability through the same frontend-facing contract./infotells the client which concrete remote-agent implementation to use.- Frontend app code stays mostly unchanged.
If the setup feels bigger than “add the CPK-I to the runtime,” the abstraction is probably leaking.