The 6 beautiful-chat demos (spring-ai, strands, langroid, agno,
claude-sdk-typescript, claude-sdk-python) ship three identical
suggestion chips: "Plan a 3-day Tokyo trip", "Explain RAG like I'm
12", and "Draft a launch email". Against the deployed aimock-backed
showcase, all three were broken:
- Tokyo trip: hijacked by the broad `userMessage: "hi"` fixture,
because the substring "hi" appears inside "arc**hi**tecture" in
the prompt. Returned a generic "Hi there! I'm your showcase
assistant..." greeting with nothing about Tokyo.
- RAG explain: no fixture matched, aimock returned an error.
- Launch email: same — no fixture, error.
Add three on-topic fixtures with the full suggestion sentence as
`userMessage` (effectively-exact substring match). Place them
before the broad "hi" fixture in the file so first-match-wins
routes each suggestion to the right response.
Add a `beautiful-chat.spec.ts` regression suite to all 6
integrations: send each suggestion, assert the right keywords
appear in the assistant reply ("Day 1/2/3" for Tokyo,
"open-book/RAG" for RAG, "Subject:/co-pilot" for email), AND
assert the hijacked greeting is absent. If the broad "hi" fixture
re-broadens or the new fixtures are reordered/removed, these
tests fail loudly.
Alem Tuzlak