mirror of
https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing.git
synced 2026-09-19 01:32:11 +08:00
e61e8280f0
Co-authored-by: shahriariqbal <shahriariqbal@users.noreply.github.com>
123 lines
4.3 KiB
YAML
123 lines
4.3 KiB
YAML
name: Pattern proposal
|
|
description: Propose a new AI-writing pattern for the catalog or the detector
|
|
title: "Pattern proposal: "
|
|
labels: ["enhancement"]
|
|
body:
|
|
- type: markdown
|
|
attributes:
|
|
value: |
|
|
Thanks for proposing a pattern. Two questions decide what happens to it:
|
|
whether a regex can find it, and who gets flagged by mistake if it ships.
|
|
This form asks both up front so the proposal can be evaluated on its
|
|
evidence rather than on a round of follow-up questions.
|
|
|
|
`CONTRIBUTING.md` has the full picture of where a rule lands once it is
|
|
accepted. You do not need to have read it to file this.
|
|
|
|
Please do not paste anything you would mind seeing in a public repo.
|
|
|
|
- type: input
|
|
id: name
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Pattern name
|
|
description: A short handle for the thing itself, not a description of it.
|
|
placeholder: Synonym cycling
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: should-fire
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Text that should be flagged
|
|
description: The shortest example that shows the pattern. A sentence or two is usually enough.
|
|
placeholder: Paste the exact text here.
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: must-not-fire
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Nearby text that must stay clean
|
|
description: Writing that looks close to the example above but is ordinary human prose. This is the harder half of the proposal, and a rule without one tends to fire on everything.
|
|
placeholder: Paste the exact text here.
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: why
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Why this is a tell
|
|
description: What makes the first example machine-shaped and the second one not?
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: false-positives
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Who gets flagged by mistake
|
|
description: Legitimate uses you know of, registers where the rule would misfire, carve-outs it would need. Write "none I could find" if you looked and came up empty; that is an answer.
|
|
placeholder: Fiction uses this deliberately in dialogue.
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
|
|
- type: dropdown
|
|
id: detectability
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Can a regex find it?
|
|
description: Regex-detectable rules go to the engine with a fixture. Judgment-only rules stay in the catalog for the model to apply. Unsure is a fine answer and gets sorted during triage.
|
|
options:
|
|
- Regex-detectable (a phrase, a character, or a structural shape)
|
|
- Judgment-only (needs reading for meaning)
|
|
- Unsure
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
|
|
- type: dropdown
|
|
id: fixture
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: May we use these examples as public test fixtures?
|
|
description: The issue is public. Choose whether the examples may also be copied into files that run in CI.
|
|
options:
|
|
- "Yes, use them as public fixtures"
|
|
- "No, do not copy them into committed fixtures"
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
|
|
- type: dropdown
|
|
id: register
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Register
|
|
description: Where you have seen the pattern. Rules that hold in a blog post often misfire in a changelog, so this scopes the proposal.
|
|
options:
|
|
- Blog or essay
|
|
- Technical documentation or README
|
|
- Technical blog or architecture writeup
|
|
- Academic or research writing
|
|
- Social post (LinkedIn, X)
|
|
- Email or DM
|
|
- Issue, PR, or code comment
|
|
- Changelog or release notes
|
|
- Fiction or creative
|
|
- Across several registers
|
|
- Other
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: false
|
|
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: sources
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Sources
|
|
description: Link anything that backs a factual claim about how models or people write. Skip this if the proposal rests on your own examples rather than on a claim about frequency.
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: false
|
|
|
|
- type: markdown
|
|
attributes:
|
|
value: |
|
|
**What happens next.** Triage decides which of the two homes the rule
|
|
gets, or records why it stays out. A rule that cannot survive its
|
|
must-not-fire example does not ship, and the reasoning gets written
|
|
down either way.
|
|
|
|
First-time contributors are welcome to ask for a review in the issue.
|