mirror of
https://github.com/ComposioHQ/composio.git
synced 2026-09-22 11:46:35 +08:00
051c8c5357
## Summary
Telemetry error text is redacted before it leaves the process, but the
key/value rule only matches when the separator follows the key name
directly:
```
\b(authorization|api[-_]?key|...|pwd)\b(\s*[:=]+\s*)(["']?)([^\s"',}&]+)\3
```
In JSON — and in a Python `dict` repr — the key's own closing quote sits
between the name and the colon, so `{"api_key": "..."}` never matches
and the value is sent verbatim. That is the shape error messages usually
carry: an API error envelope, a rejected request body echoed back, or an
f-string interpolating a config dict. Both SDKs share the pattern and
both are affected.
The fix moves the optional quote into the separator group
(`(["']?\s*[:=]+\s*)`). The key name, separator, and quoting are all
preserved in the output; only the value is replaced.
Measured with `redact_sensitive_text` / `redactSensitiveText` directly,
before and after:
| input | before | after |
|---|---|---|
| `api_key=sk-1` | redacted | redacted |
| `api_key: "sk-1"` | redacted | redacted |
| `x-api-key: sk-live-hdr` | redacted | redacted |
| `{"api_key": "sk-live-abc"}` | **leaks** | `{"api_key": "[REDACTED]"}`
|
| `{"api_key":"sk-live-abc"}` | **leaks** | redacted |
| `{"api_key" : "sk-live-abc"}` | **leaks** | redacted |
| `{"refresh_token":"rt-abc.def-123"}` | **leaks** | redacted |
| `{"x-api-key":"sk-hdr","user":"bob"}` | **leaks** | redacted,
`"user":"bob"` kept |
| `{'client_secret': 'cs-live-abc'}` | **leaks** | redacted |
| `the password field is required` | untouched | untouched |
| `no separator here "api_key" and nothing else` | untouched | untouched
|
The end-to-end path in Python is `composio/core/models/base.py:60-61`,
which passes `str(e)` and `traceback.format_exc()` through the redactor
into the telemetry `error` field. A tool failure whose message
interpolates the rejected request body — `Error executing tool: request
body was rejected: {"toolkit": "GMAIL", "arguments": {"api_key": "...",
...}}` — leaked the customer's key today.
## Changes
- `python/composio/utils/redaction.py`,
`ts/packages/core/src/telemetry/redact.ts`: allow a quote between the
key name and the separator.
- Tests on both sides for JSON, minified JSON, spaced-colon JSON, dict
repr, the realistic serialized-payload shape, key/quote preservation,
and no-false-positive cases.
- Changeset for `@composio/core`.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix
## How Has This Been Tested?
Node 24.13.0 / pnpm 11.8.0 / Python 3.10.20 (uv), Windows.
- `uv run pytest tests/test_redaction.py` — 13 passed. With
`redaction.py` reverted and the new tests kept, 9 of them fail; the 4
that still pass are the pre-existing test plus the three
no-false-positive controls.
- `npx vitest run test/telemetry/redact.test.ts` in `ts/packages/core` —
10 passed. With `redact.ts` reverted, the 3 new cases fail.
- Full Python suite: 913 passed, same 4 failures as on `next` unchanged
(3 are `ModuleNotFoundError: composio_langchain` from providers not
installed in my env; 1 is `test_empty_name_safe_fails_at_write_time`,
which expects `IsADirectoryError` but Windows raises `PermissionError`
when opening a directory). Collection 944 → 956, exactly the 12 tests
added.
- Full `@composio/core` vitest: 798 passed / 2 failed, byte-identical to
the unchanged baseline (794 passed / same 2 failed — both Windows
path-and-symlink cases). 11 test files fail to load in both runs because
I installed with `--ignore-scripts`; the repo's `preinstall` hook
doesn't run in my shell.
- `ruff format --check` and `ruff check` clean on the two Python files;
`prettier --write` applied to the two TypeScript files.
## Checklist
- [x] I have read the Code of Conduct and this PR adheres to it
- [x] I ran linters/tests locally and they passed
- [ ] I updated documentation as needed — no user-facing behavior change
to document
- [x] I added tests or explain why not applicable
- [x] I added a changeset if this change affects published packages
## Additional context
This is defence-in-depth, so it stays deliberately narrow: same denylist
of key names, same value character class, no new rules. Bare-prefix
secrets (`sk-...`, `ghp_...`) and PEM blocks are still not matched by
either SDK — worth a separate look, but widening the pattern is a
different risk trade-off than closing a shape the rule already intends
to cover.