mirror of
https://github.com/callstack/agent-device.git
synced 2026-09-14 20:06:34 +08:00
Michał Pierzchała
62001cf210
* refactor(record): derive session recording from the publication lifecycle `SessionState.recordSession` stored an answer the script-publication aggregate already contained. Every writer set both, but nothing made them agree, and #1533 was the consequence: a `--save-script` ingress re-armed the flag behind an ABORTED status, and a bare `close` published a recording the caller had been told was aborted. That fix routed every write through one rule, which made the two agree without making disagreement unrepresentable. The field remained a second source of truth, and its doc comments had to carry the invariant that a type could enforce. Remove the field and derive the answer. `isRecordingPublication` reads recording off the lifecycle: ordinary authoring records only while ARMED; a repair transaction records for its whole lifetime, terminal statuses included. That last clause is deliberately exact rather than merely safe — `armRepairStep` armed the old flag and neither `abortRepair` nor `commitRepair` ever cleared it, so narrowing it would silently stop evidence capture for a committed repair. Whether it should is a real question, and a behavior change, so it is left alone here. What this buys, beyond one less field: - `buildNextOpenSession` and `finalizeOrdinaryCloseScript` make no recording decision at all now, so no surface can arm recording without moving the lifecycle that authorizes it. - The writer's publication gate is answered entirely by the aggregate. Its separate ABORTED check is gone: a terminal authoring lifecycle is already not recording, so one question replaces two that could disagree. - The R7 ownership ratchet drops from 23 writer-owned fields / 29 owner claims to 22 / 26, and the layering manifest loses the entry whose comment documented the smell ("deliberately set on its own by paths that record without arming a publication"). Behavior-preserving: the derivation reproduces what the flag held at every transition. The test fixtures that armed `recordSession` with no publication state described a shape production stopped producing at #1478; they now carry the lifecycle that causes recording. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PFW9gJqz1wEHoowkdd1nFW * test(close-script): flush queued event-log writes before removing the tmp root CI failed the Coverage lane with ENOTEMPTY removing the test's tmp root, in `afterEach` rather than in an assertion. `SessionStore.recordAction` QUEUES its event-log append (`queueEventLogWrite`) instead of writing it, and every close path in this file records an action. Nothing awaited that write, so `fs.rmSync(root, {recursive: true})` could race it: the pending append recreates `<root>/sessions/<name>/` while rmSync is walking, and the final rmdir fails ENOTEMPTY. It needs CI's parallel load to lose the race — the file passes 12/12 in isolation locally. Await `flushSessionEventLogWrites()` before removing. The hazard is latent in any test that records actions and then removes its tmp root; this fixes the file that failed rather than sweeping the pattern, which deserves its own change. Not added to the #1419 contention-retry list: that list requires a concrete spawn/wait mechanism named per entry, and this file has none. The race was a real teardown bug, not lane contention. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PFW9gJqz1wEHoowkdd1nFW * docs: correct ADR 0016 on recording vs publication for repair Review caught a real overstatement. The amendment claimed evidence capture and publication authorization are "the same question asked of the same state". That holds for ordinary authoring — ARMED both records and publishes, ABORTED and PUBLISHED do neither — but not for repair: `isRecordingPublication` is true for every repair status including `committed` and `aborted`, while the writer additionally applies `isRepairArmedWriteBlocked`, refusing a committed transaction and one that is not yet committable. State it as it is: both decisions derive from the same aggregate, but they remain distinct predicates, and collapsing them would republish a committed repair or commit an incomplete prefix. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PFW9gJqz1wEHoowkdd1nFW --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>