* fix(scroll): keep saturated scroll gestures out of the status bar; gate Android replays from android/emulator (#1781 A1) `pnpm gate replay-android` failed 4/8 whenever it ran after the full-tier Android E2E (replays-nightly run 32107665052, job 95620294899): 05-app-lifecycle, 06-swipe-gestures and both fixture replays diverged under "A system surface covers the app". The E2E was not the cause. Reproduced on a pixel_7 / API 36 AVD with the same cutout geometry CI's `avdmanager --device pixel_7` produces (status bar 136px, not the 63px of a plain 1080x2400 skin): - `03-scroll-discovery.ad` runs `scroll up 3`. The scroll planner clamps travel to the viewport minus a 5% band, so the touch-down landed at y=120 — inside the 136px status bar — and pulled the notification shade instead of scrolling. On API 36 the app window is edge-to-edge, so the reported viewport starts at y=0 and includes that bar. - The shade then covered every replay until `04`'s `back` closed it. Native readdir order on the runner (03, 05, 06, fixture/02, fixture/01, 04, 01, 02) put four files in that window; the last green run (2026-07-30) had 04 right after 03, so the pull was masked. Fix in the product, not the lane: DEFAULT_EDGE_PADDING_FRACTION 0.05 -> 0.1 in the TS scroll planner and its Swift port. Every real Pixel has a cutout (5.7% of a Pixel 7's height) and an iPhone's Dynamic Island status bar is 6.9%, so any saturated `scroll up` opened the shade / Notification Center for real agents too. Parity vectors updated in both suites plus a Pixel 7 regression vector (1080x2400, amount 3 -> touch-down y=240 > 136). Second contamination the same order exposed once the shade was gone: `fixture/02-selector-routes-covered-diagnosis.ad` is a #1715 reproduction recipe that FAILS BY DESIGN at step 9 (covered-target refusal) and leaves the device in landscape, yet the gate enumerated `test/integration/replays/android` recursively. iOS keeps gate replays in `replays/ios/simulator` and fixture recipes in `replays/ios/fixture`; Android now mirrors that: the six Settings replays move to `replays/android/emulator`, `test:replay:android` points there, and `fixture/` stays E2E-owned (`full:fixture-replays` already runs 01 by path). android.yml and the workflow-evidence fixture follow the path; the replay-compat manifest keeps the historical paths it pins at released tags. Verified live (Pixel 7 geometry, API 36, --retries 0): control run at main head in CI order reproduces exactly CI's 4/8; with the fix, `pnpm gate replay-android` 6/6 in both native and CI order, and `03` leaves Settings on screen (scroll up 3 now touches down at y=240). * test(scroll): drive the TS and Swift scroll-plan parity vectors from one table (#1820 review) The two suites hand-mirrored the same vectors and #1820 had to edit both by hand — the drift class the repo already closes for the tap-point rule via contracts/fixtures/tap-point-policy.json. The scroll vectors (plus both planner constants, pinned behaviourally on a 1000px axis) now live in contracts/fixtures/scroll-gesture.json; scroll-gesture.test.ts and RunnerTests+ScrollGesture.swift iterate it. Verified: vitest 10/10; the four XCTests run on an iOS 26.2 simulator with the unit flag on (Executed 4 tests, 0 failures). Also: test/ci/android-workflow-evidence.json says what it guards. Follow-up for content-safe viewport bounds + discovery order: #1821.
agent-device iOS Runner
This folder contains the lightweight XCUITest runner used to provide element-level automation for Apple-family targets.
Intent
- Provide a minimal XCTest target that exposes UI automation over a small HTTP server.
- Allow local builds via
xcodebuildand caching for faster subsequent runs. - Support simulator prebuilds where compatible.
Status
Current internal runner for iOS, tvOS, and macOS desktop automation.
Protocol and maintenance references:
- Protocol overview:
RUNNER_PROTOCOL.md - TypeScript client:
../../src/platforms/apple/core/runner/runner-client.ts - Swift wire models:
AgentDeviceRunner/AgentDeviceRunnerUITests/RunnerTests+Models.swift
UITest Runner File Map
AgentDeviceRunnerUITests/RunnerTests is split into focused files to reduce context size for contributors and LLM agents.
RunnerTests.swift: shared state/constants,setUp(), andtestCommand()entry flow.RunnerTests+Models.swift: wire protocol models (Command,Response, snapshot payload models).RunnerTests+Environment.swift: environment and CLI argument helpers (RunnerEnv).RunnerTests+Transport.swift: TCP request handling and HTTP parsing/encoding.RunnerTests+CommandExecution.swift: command dispatch (execute*) and command switch.RunnerTests+Lifecycle.swift: activation/retry/stabilization and recording lifecycle helpers.RunnerTests+Interaction.swift: tap/drag/swipe/type/home/rotate/app-switcher helpers.RunnerTests+Navigation.swift: back/navigation-control helpers.RunnerTests+Snapshot.swift: fast/raw snapshot builders and include/filter helpers.RunnerTests+SystemModal.swift: SpringBoard/system modal detection and modal snapshot shaping.RunnerTests+ScreenRecorder.swift: nestedScreenRecorderimplementation.
Snapshot Strategy
iOS snapshots have two explicit public capture modes:
- full/raw snapshots use recursive XCTest snapshots for rich hierarchy and diagnostics;
- interactive snapshots filter the same visible tree down to agent-facing refs.
Some iOS apps expose accessibility trees that lower-level AX services can inspect but XCTest cannot
serialize reliably. In those cases interactive snapshots may return a sparse root quickly, while
full snapshots preserve the XCTest error. A penalized simulator can recover through private AX;
physical devices use a short XCTest probe because no non-XCTest semantic backend is available
there. See
../../docs/adr/0004-ios-snapshot-backend-strategy.md
for the backend boundary and future simulator AX-service direction.
Protocol Notes
- The daemon posts JSON commands to
POST /commandon the runner's local HTTP listener. - The runner responds with a JSON envelope shaped as
{ ok, data?, error? }. - The protocol is internal to
agent-device; when adding or renaming commands, update both wire models and the protocol tests/docs in the same change.