3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alex Verkhovsky ad86519c6b build: replace the npm lint stack with pre-commit (#2832)
* build: replace the npm lint stack with pre-commit

markdownlint-cli2, prettier and eslint for YAML/JSON, husky and
lint-staged are gone. pre-commit runs ruff, rumdl (the same five
markdown rules), yamllint, yamlfix, the JSON checks, both validators
and pytest, at commit time and over the whole tree from
tools/quality.py, which is now what `npm run quality` calls. ESLint and
prettier stay only for the docs-site scripts and tests. quality.yaml
collapses to a Python job and a docs-site job.

yamlfix keeps one blank line and no document-start marker: its defaults
strip blank lines inside block scalars and add `---`, which the sprint
status scripts do not write back. The JSON hook keeps key order and
non-ASCII text.

* style: apply yamlfix and JSON formatting to the tree

Mechanical output of the new hooks; every file parses to the same data.

* docs: state what the commit hook covers
2026-09-05 13:25:19 -06:00
Alex Verkhovsky cb73c05cf6 fix: use pull_request_target for CodeRabbit review trigger (#1583)
The workflow was failing with 403 "Resource not accessible by integration"
on fork PRs because pull_request events get read-only GITHUB_TOKEN
permissions for cross-repository PRs. Switching to pull_request_target
runs the workflow in the base repo context, granting write permissions
needed to post the @coderabbitai review comment.

This is safe because the workflow only posts a comment and does not
check out or execute any code from the PR branch.

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-07 10:27:57 -06:00
Alex Verkhovsky d027811954 ci: trigger CodeRabbit review on PR un-draft (#1558)
CodeRabbit doesn't reliably handle the ready_for_review webhook
event, so draft PRs that are marked ready never get auto-reviewed.
This workflow posts @coderabbitai review when a PR transitions
from draft to ready, working around the limitation.
2026-02-06 07:31:58 -06:00