3 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Michael Ramos	c353413b55	fix(hook): enable the annotate client lease on OpenCode's last-message bridge ... #1143 wired abandoned-gate dismissal into three of the four startAnnotateServer call sites. The OpenCode annotate-last bridge takes gate from stdin JSON rather than CLI flags and was missed, so /plannotator-last --gate under OpenCode still hung on waitForDecision forever once every review tab was abandoned: exactly the hang that commit set out to close. The bridge's inputs map onto the same predicate the other three use: gate from the stdin payload, json unconditionally true because emitOpenCodeAnnotateOutcome is the branch's only output path and always writes a structured record the bridge parses back, hook false because no flags are parsed here. The new test scans every startAnnotateServer call site in index.ts rather than pinning this one line, so the next site added cannot repeat the omission. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H5KQWqXqjrPxyxUNso1QHS	2026-07-30 03:03:13 -07:00
Raúl	c750427ab8	feat(annotate): dismiss abandoned gate sessions (#1143) ... A direct local `plannotator annotate --gate --json` waits for one authoritative decision. If every review surface disappears without approving, sending feedback, or exiting, the caller blocks forever: the server has no notion of whether a client ever connected, whether another tab is still open, or whether a disconnect is a reload. Page lifecycle events cannot answer that. `pagehide` and `beforeunload` also fire on reload and navigation, so dismissing from them ends reviews the user expects to resume. Use connection presence instead, which is exactly what the transport can observe. Local direct structured gates advertise a client lease in /api/plan and serve /api/annotate/client-lease as SSE. One open stream is one connected review surface. The server heartbeats every 5s and, only after at least one client has connected, starts a 30s reconnect grace when the last one disconnects. A reconnect inside the grace continues the same review; expiry resolves the gate through the same path as explicit Close, so it produces an ordinary `dismissed` decision and inherits the strict-result contract unchanged. Approve, feedback, explicit exit, and server stop all cancel a pending expiry. Presence lives in two runtime-independent pieces so Bun and Pi cannot drift. createAnnotateClientLeaseTracker owns first-client, active-count, reconnect, cancellation, and one-shot expiry. createAnnotateClientLease- StreamSession owns one connected client: acquire the slot, write the ready comment, heartbeat, release exactly once. Each server passes only its own write primitive (a ReadableStream controller for Bun, res.write for Pi). A write that fails closes the session, because a stream that can no longer be written to is a client that is no longer present; holding the slot there would make the gate un-dismissable for the rest of the run, which is reachable only through a half-open connection and so is covered by unit tests rather than an integration test. Scope is deliberately narrow. The capability stays off for remote and shared sessions, where tunnel disconnects would read as abandonment, and off for hook transport, legacy plaintext, archive, plan, review, and folder-picker sessions. A session that never receives its first client never auto-dismisses, so browser-launch failures still need a caller-side timeout. Decision settlement is explicit for the same reason: a connected surface and the lease can both try to settle the session, and the awaited promise ignoring the second resolve was not enough. The loser still deleted the reviewer's draft and answered ok, so a tab reported success for a decision the caller never received. createAnnotateDecisionSettler makes the winner explicit; a loser changes nothing and answers 409. Expiry deliberately keeps the saved draft, unlike explicit Close, so an abandoned review stays recoverable. Stopping the server closes live lease streams instead of only releasing their slots, so a long-lived host process does not retain a heartbeat timer and an open response for every finished session.	2026-07-29 23:02:49 -07:00
Raúl	9a450a69e7	feat(annotate): preserve notes on structured approval (#1092) ... * feat(annotate): add strict atomic result output * feat(annotate): exit 2 for strict-gate usage and publication errors Adopt the grep convention for the strict annotate gate's exit codes: 0 = approved, 1 = negative human outcome (annotated/dismissed under --require-approval), 2 = the gate itself was misconfigured or could not start/deliver a decision. Previously all usage/startup/validation failures shared exit 1 with "reviewer did not approve", so callers could not tell a denied review from a broken gate. - parseStrictAnnotateOptions failures (bad flag combos, strict flags outside annotate --gate --json) now exit 2 - --result-file preflight failures (missing parent, pre-existing or dangling-symlink destination) now exit 2 - post-decision publication failures (destination raced into existence, hard links unavailable, stdout write failure) now exit 2: they deliver no decision record at all, so the code's own fail-closed handling presents them as environment errors, never as a reviewer outcome -- and never approval, since only 0 means approved - decision outcomes keep 0/1 exactly as before; signal deaths keep 128+n - document the contract in AGENTS.md and the annotate-gates guide Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YXkgsNucxDwAL4GdR4XYRk * feat(annotate): preserve notes on structured approval * test(pi): use exact annotate outcome import * fix(annotate): exit 2 for strict-gate startup failures The six startup-failure sites in the annotate path (missing path, unreachable URL, empty folder, ambiguous name, missing/unsupported file, oversized file) run after flag parsing and exited 1. Under --require-approval / --result-file, 1 is the "reviewer requested changes" signal, so a typo'd path made automation misclassify a configuration error as a legitimate rejection. Route those sites through exitAnnotateStartupFailure(), which picks its code from the already-parsed strict options via the new pure helper annotateStartupFailureExitCode(). Non-strict invocations still exit 1 with byte-identical stderr; strict invocations exit STRICT_GATE_ERROR_EXIT_CODE (2). Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H5KQWqXqjrPxyxUNso1QHS * fix(annotate): emit the strict decision on stdout before publishing it writeResultFile ran before the decision JSON reached stdout. On a filesystem without hard links (exFAT, FAT32, most SMB/NFS, some container bind mounts) publication fails deterministically, the catch exited 2 with nothing written anywhere — and the reviewer's autosaved draft had already been deleted by the feedback flow, so their completed decision was lost. Emit the stdout record first, then publish the result file. Exit semantics are unchanged: a publication failure still exits 2, but the decision has reached stdout by then. Only a stdout write failure now leaves no record at all. Correct the docs and comments that claimed exit 2 delivers no decision record: it means the result *file* was not published. Also document the two publication caveats: the 0600 mode is a no-op on Windows, and the atomic link/rename is not followed by a parent-directory fsync, so publication is atomic but not crash-durable. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H5KQWqXqjrPxyxUNso1QHS * fix(annotate): parse linked docs with the render-side frontmatter rule on export buildCompleteAnnotateFeedback re-parsed each linked document with parseMarkdownToBlocks(entry.markdown) — no options, so frontmatter stripping defaulted on. The render side parses with { frontmatter: shouldStripFrontmatter(path) }. For plain-text linked docs (.yaml/.json/.toml/…) a leading `---` is real content, not frontmatter: a multi-document YAML opens with it. Stripping it on the export side shifted every block id, so ordinary Send Feedback and deny emitted wrong `(line N)` labels — or dropped them entirely when the annotation's block no longer existed. Pass the same shouldStripFrontmatter(filepath) option at the export call site so both sides agree. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H5KQWqXqjrPxyxUNso1QHS * fix(annotate): carry the message scope through approve-with-notes /api/feedback forwards selectedMessageId and feedbackScope; /api/approve dropped them. Pi resolves the anchor message from those fields, so notes delivered on the approve path anchored to the last message instead of the one the reviewer picked in a multi-message annotate-last session — while Send Feedback in the same session anchored correctly. Forward both fields on the approve path in the Bun and Pi servers, and have the client build the approval body with the same scope resolution Send Feedback uses (extracted as getFeedbackMessageScope so the two can no longer drift). Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H5KQWqXqjrPxyxUNso1QHS * docs(annotate): tell agents an approval may carry notes The skill and slash-command files still described `"decision": "approved"` as "acknowledge and stop", with no mention of the feedback field the gate can now attach — so an agent reading them would silently drop the reviewer's approval notes. Update the Claude core/claude skills, the Copilot commands, the Gemini annotate command, and the annotate command reference so the approved branch names the optional feedback field and says what to do with it: carry it into subsequent work, do not treat it as a change request. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H5KQWqXqjrPxyxUNso1QHS * docs(annotate): document the real approvedWithNotes default The default annotate.approvedWithNotes template is `{{contextBlock}}{{feedback}}`, not `{{context}}` on its own line, and {{contextBlock}} was missing from the variable table entirely. Show the actual default, add {{contextBlock}} to the variable table, and explain why the default prefers it: it collapses to nothing for message annotations instead of leaving a stray blank line. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H5KQWqXqjrPxyxUNso1QHS --------- Co-authored-by: Michael Ramos <mdramos8@gmail.com>	2026-07-26 21:09:28 -07:00