Previously, when a downgraded component was destroyed in a way that did
not trigger the `$destroy` event on the element (e.g. when a parent
element was removed from the DOM by Angular, not AngularJS), the
`ComponentRef` was not destroyed and unregistered.
This commit fixes it by listening for the `$destroy` event on both the
element and the scope.
Fixes#22392
PR Close#22400
* Add correct mapping from camel case to kebab case for CSS style
names
* Remove internal CSS methods in favor of native Domino APIs
Fixes#19235
PR Close#22263
The function provided by `ngUpgrade` as `parentBoundTranscludeFn` when
upgrading a component with transclusion, will break in AngularJS v1.5.8+
if no transclusion content is provided. The reason is that AngularJS
will try to destroy the transclusion scope (which would not be needed
any more). But since the transcluded content comes from Angular, not
AngularJS, there is no transclusion scope to destroy.
This commit fixes it by providing a dummy scope object with a no-op
`$destroy()` method.
Fixes#22175
PR Close#22167
Previously, having a `=` binding on an upgraded components would result
in setting the corresponding property to an EventEmitter function. This
should only happen for `&` bindings.
This commit rstrores the correct behavior.
Note:
The issue was only present in the dynamic version of `ngUpgrade`. The
static version worked as expected.
The error did not show up in tests, because in AngularJS v1.5.x a
function would be serialized to an empty string in interpolations, thus
making them indistinguishable from uninitialized properties (in the
view). The serialization behavior changed in AngularJS v1.6.x, making
the errors visible.
PR Close#22167
`packages/upgrade/static/src` is anymlink to `packages/upgrade/src`.
Still, using the correct paths (e.g. using
`@angular/upgrade/static/src/...` for `@angula/upgrade/static` specs
ensures that the module loader (e.g. SystemJS) can map the imports to
the same instances.
PR Close#22167
The AsyncPipe type signature was changed to allow
deferred creation of promises and observalbes that
is supported by the implementation by allowing
`Promise<T>|null|undefined` and by allowing
`Observable<T>|null|undefined`.
PR Close#22169
Both Firefox and Safari are vulnerable to XSS if we use an inert document
created via `document.implementation.createHTMLDocument()`.
Now we check for those vulnerabilities and then use a DOMParser or XHR
strategy if needed.
Further the platform-server has its own library for parsing HTML, so we
sniff for that (by checking whether DOMParser exists) and fall back to
the standard strategy.
Thanks to @cure53 for the heads up on this issue.
PR Close#17019
Previously, the emitEvent flag was only checked when emitting on the current control.
Thus, if the control was part of a hierarchy, events were emitted on the parent and the childrens.
This fixes the issue by properly passing the emitEvent flag to both parent and childrens.
Fixes#12366
PR Close#21018
Previously, an interceptor attempting to inject HttpClient directly
would receive a circular dependency error, as HttpClient was
constructed via a factory which injected the interceptor instances.
Users want to inject HttpClient into interceptors to make supporting
requests (ex: to retrieve an authentication token). Currently this is
only possible by injecting the Injector and using it to resolve
HttpClient at request time.
Either HttpClient or the user has to deal specially with the circular
dependency. This change moves that responsibility into HttpClient
itself. By utilizing a new class HttpInterceptingHandler which lazily
loads the set of interceptors at request time, it's possible to inject
HttpClient directly into interceptors as construction of HttpClient no
longer requires the interceptor chain to be constructed.
Fixes#18224.
PR Close#19809
George Kalpakas