This commit adds decorators to the extracted API docs. It makes some
very hard-coded assumptions about the pattern used to declare decorators
that's extremely specific to what the framework does today.
PR Close#52389
Issue #50320 shows that in some cases, updating a signal that's a dependency
of a template during change detection of that template can have several
adverse effects. This can happen, for example, if the signal is set during
the lifecycle hook of a directive within the same template that reads the
signal.
This can cause a few things to happen:
* Straightforwardly, it can cause `ExpressionChanged` errors.
* Surprisingly, it can cause an assertion within the `ReactiveLViewConsumer`
to fail.
* Very surprisingly, it can cause change detection for an `OnPush` component
to stop working.
The root cause of these later behaviors is subtle, and is ultimately a
desync between the reactive graph and the view tree's notion of "dirty" for
a given view. This will be fixed with further work planned for change
detection to handle such updates directly. Until then, this commit improves
the DX through two changes:
1. The mechanism of "committing" `ReactiveLViewConsumer`s to a view is
changed to use the `consumerOnSignalRead` hook from the reactive graph.
This prevents the situation which required the assertion in the first
place.
2. A `console.warn` warning is added when a view is marked dirty via a
signal while it's still executing.
The warning informs users that they're pushing data against the direction of
change detection, risking `ExpressionChanged` or other issues. It's a
warning and not an error because the check is overly broad and captures
situations where the application would not actually break as a result, such
as if a `computed` marked the template dirty but still returned the same
value.
PR Close#52427
The `RouterTestingHarness` should throw an error if the call to `navigateByUrl`
expects a component to be activated but the navigation failed.
fixes#52344
PR Close#52357
Previously, because the platform injector does not have a provider container, this API would fail. Now, we account for this case specifically by returning the found providers immediately, without trying to calculate their importpaths.
Also previously, in the case where a boostrapped standalone component did not import any feature modules, the environment injector connected to that bootstrapped component would be the root injector configured by `bootstrapApplication`. This injector is configured through a `providers` array instead of an `imports` array, and also does not have a provider container. Similarly to the platform case, we account this for this by returning the found providers immediately if there is no provider container for our standalone component.
PR Close#52365
Previously this case was missed by the default framework injector profiler. Now in ngDevMode this event emits correctly when a service is configured with `providedIn`. This includes the case where injection tokens are configured with a `providedIn`.
This commit also includes unit tests for this new case in the injector profiler.
PR Close#52365
This updates the code to handle switches more elegantly in line with how the other blocks are handled. This allows nesting to be handled just like other blocks.
PR Close#52358
`globalThis` global property contains the global `this` value, which is usually akin to the global object. This is needed for better compatibility with CloudFlare workers were global nor window are defined as globals.
PR Close#52367
This commit runs change detection in a loop while there are still dirty
views to be refreshed in the tree. At the moment, this only applies to
transplanted views but will also apply to views with changed signals.
fixes angular#49801
PR Close#51854
When migrating an ng-template later on in a file, the migrationResult was not being reset to zero and causing offsets to be double applied due to ng-template nodes being included in the migration loop.
PR Close#52355
Previously, we would emit *two* pipe creation instructions for each pipe in a switch case. This is because we were visiting both the transformed and raw versions of the pipe bindings.
Now, we clear the raw case expressions array after generating the transformed test expression.
Also, we introduce some new goldens, because our pipe creation order is harmlessly different.
PR Close#52289
We roughly attempt to match TemplateDefinitionBuilder's pipe creation order, by placing pipe creation instructions after their target elements. However, we cannot fully emulate the "inside-out" ordering TemplateDefinitionBuilder uses when multiple pipes apply to one element, because TemplateDefinitionBuilder creates the pipes as expressions are visited, from the leaves up. Our order is perfectly adequate though.
We also add a non-compatibility-mode ordering, which just appends them to the end of the create block. This is better because it allows for more chaining opportunities.
PR Close#52289
Singleton property interpolation instructions consume only one variable, but are still emitted as an interpolation instruction (they cannot be collapsed because `propertyInterpolate` implicitly stringifies its argument.)
PR Close#52289
We were incorrectly emiting a extracted constant pool index for the final argument of the projection instruction. It actually takes an array literal.
(N.B.: This means we re-create the array every time! We should probably modify the runtime to use a const index for this.)
Additionally, we alter the projection op to not extend the element op base type.
PR Close#52289
The correct order of attributes and properties is:
1. Interpolated properties
2. Interpolated attributes
3. Non-interpolated properties
4. Non-interpolated attributes
This includes an additional nuance: singleton attribute interpolations, such as `[attr.foo]="{{bar}}"`, will be "collaped" into a simple `attribute` instruction. However, this is *not* the case for singleton property interpolations! The ordering phase must take this nuance into account to match the TemplateDefinitionBuilder order.
After the project lands, it might be nice to also collapse singleton property interpolations.
PR Close#52289
Previously, we ran the ordering phase near the end of the compilation. However, this meant that phases like slot assignment and variable offset assignment would happen first, and then the nice, monotonically-increasing orders would be scrambled by the reordering.
It's much more intelligible to order first, and then perform these assignments. However, to make this happen, some modifications to the ordering phase are required. In particular, we can no longer rely on `advance` instructions to break up orderable groups.
PR Close#52289
Many instructions consume variable slots, which are used to persist data between update runs. For top-level instructions, the offset into the variable data array is implicitly advanced, because those instructions always run.
However, instructions in non-top-level expressions cannot be assumed to run every time, because they might be conditionally executed. Therefore, they cannot implicitly advance the offset into the variable data, and must be given an explicitly assigned variable offset.
TemplateDefinitionBuilder assigned offsets top-to-bottom for all instructions *except* pure functions. Pure functions would be assigned offsets lazily, on a second pass.
Template Pipeline can now imitate this behavior, when in compatibility mode: pure functions are assigned offsets on a second pass.
This also makes the "variadic var offsets" phase unnecessary -- the new approach is more general and correct.
PR Close#52289
Previously, inside an event listener, template pipeline would always save the context from restoring a view, e.g.
```
const restored_ctx = r0.ɵɵrestoreView(s);
```
This is usually correct! However, consider the case of a listener in the template's root view. The appropriate context will already be available via closure capture, and we can just use it (as `ctx`).
Now, the context resolution phase understands that we don't need to use the restored view's saved context if we would have access to it by closure.
Note: we also create a new golden, because the const array is in a harmlessly different order.
PR Close#52289
Previously, the template pipeline did not handle "empty" reads gracefully: it would emit syntactically invalid reads of empty properties. Now we read `$implicit`.
This allows us to enable a test that relies on `$implicit`. However, we also have to create another golden, because our variable inlining is more aggressive.
PR Close#52289
We currently allow elements to be collapsed around pipe creation instructions. TemplateDefinitionBuilder disallows this, but only sometimes. Collapsing in this case is actually less generated code, and it's OK to allow it.
PR Close#52289
Jeremy Elbourn