The `canceledNavigationResolution: 'computed'` option does not correctly
assign page IDs or restore them when redirects result in navigating to
the current URL. This change ensures that the page IDs are still
incremented and restored correctly in this scenario.
PR Close#49793
`RouterOutlet` components can initialize _during_ change detection (for
example, if they exist in an embedded view). When this happens, data
from the router should be bound immediately to the routed components
rather than not being available until the next round of change
detection. This is mostly just a problem for testing because change
detection is triggered manually. It would be surprising to have to
detect changes _twice_ on the fixture in order to get data bound to the
routed component.
PR Close#49741
This reverts commit 2279f4d4620eba083a9832ed096890b69a25ec42.
Reverting that commit based off PR feedback that this change should only affect the parsing of sergments and node encoding of the url
PR Close#47332
fix router segment name parsing to allow segements to container an unscaped = character. Currently if you have a url like /some-site/folder=/some-file then then middle segment "folder=" will stop parsing at the = sign and register that part of the path as just "folder"
Fixes#21381
PR Close#47332
`RouterTestingModule` is not needed as of v16. Instead, TestBed
automatically provides `MockPlatformLocation` in order to help test
navigations in the application. The location mocks in the
RouterTestingModule aren't necessary anymore.
There doesn't appear to be any real documentation around
`RouterTestingModule` other than the API docs.
PR Close#49427
The previous fix for squashing empty children didn't quite work when the
existing route had segments. The result would be that the segments from
the existing route were dropped from the final URL.
PR Close#49691
The navigation transition clears the current navigation in the finalize
operator of the current navigation Observer. This commit both completes
the `bootstrapDone` observable and updates the transition to only take 1
emit from the completed navigation. Either of these changes on their own
would fix the issue. The latter is a preventative measure in case a
mistake like the former is made again.
fixes#49567
PR Close#49572
The easiest way to access route data is now to use direct bindings to
component inputs rather than going through `ActivatedRoute`.
The tour of heroes guide still uses `ActivatedRoute` for now. I was
hesitant to remove all of the content in one swoop and the tour of
heroes is quite a bit more involved.
PR Close#49633
Adds ability for `RouterOutlet` to bind `Router` information to the routed
component's inputs. This commit also exposes some helpers for
implementers of custom outlets to do their own input binding if desired.
Resolves#18967
PR Close#49633
When navigating in the Router, the current approach does the redirects
and the creation of the `RouterStateSnapshot` in two separate steps
(applyRedirects and recognize). These two steps duplicate the route
matching logic, resulting in user code on routes being executing twice
(custom `UrlMatcher` and `canMatch` guards). This also duplicates the
complex matching logic in two places, which increases the bundle size
and maintenance burden.
This commit combines the `applyRedirects` and `recognize` steps into a
single matching algorithm.
fixes#26081
PR Close#49163
When navigating in the Router, the current approach does the redirects
and the creation of the `RouterStateSnapshot` in two separate steps
(applyRedirects and recognize). These two steps duplicate the route
matching logic, resulting in user code on routes being executing twice
(custom `UrlMatcher` and `canMatch` guards). This also duplicates the
complex matching logic in two places, which increases the bundle size
and maintenance burden.
This commit combines the `applyRedirects` and `recognize` steps into a
single matching algorithm.
fixes#26081
PR Close#49163
The preloading strategy did not handle a `loadComponent` on a route with
a static `children`. It only preloaded children if they were also
`loadChildren` or both were not lazy loaded.
fixes#49558
PR Close#49571
This zone code was added with the incorrect assumption that it would
avoid scheduling a new change detection by creating the timeout outside
of the Angular zone. However, it has recently been (re)discovered that
calling `zone.run` when you are outside the angular zone results in a
synchronous change detection. With that, this bit of code doesn't
actually accomplish what it set out to do so it can be removed.
minimal repro: https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-hbzbqs?file=src%2Fmain.ts
PR Close#49238
Add a more specific error message when defining a lazy-loaded route using
`loadComponent` and passing it a NgModule instead of a standalone component,
when the user should actually be using `loadChildren`.
PR Close#49164
41e2a68e30 added a `type` property on all router events, and added all type of events to the `Event` union type, but forgot to remove `RouterEvent`.
This removes the benefit of the `type` field, because it is not possible to write:
```
this.router.events.pipe(filter((event: Event): event is NavigationEnd => event.type === EventType.NavigationEnd)).subscribe(/*...*/);
```
as `RouterEvent` does not have a `type` field (hence TS complains).
This commit fixes the issue by removing `RouterEvent` from the union type.
BREAKING CHANGE: The `RouterEvent` type is no longer present in the `Event` union type representing all router event types. If you have code using something like `filter((e: Event): e is RouterEvent => e instanceof RouterEvent)`, you'll need to update it to `filter((e: Event|RouterEvent): e is RouterEvent => e instanceof RouterEvent)`.
PR Close#46061
The Router scroller only listens for NavigationEnd events. However, the
default behavior of the Router is to ignore navigations to the same URL.
This breaks the anchor scrolling when clicking on an anchor whose
fragment is already in the URL.
fixes#29099
BREAKING CHANGE: The `Scroll` event's `routerEvent` property may also be
a `NavigationSkipped` event. Previously, it was only a `NavigationEnd`
event.
PR Close#48025
The details of this commit are pretty thoroughly described in the tests
and code comments. In short, it is sometimes ambiguous where to apply commands in
a `SegmentGroup` tree that is created from an `ActivatedRoute` when
dealing with empty paths. This adjusts the strategy to tolerate more
ambiguity while still allowing developers to be explicit.
This is a fix-forward for b/265215141
PR Close#48734
`withNavigationErrorHandler` is a close replacement for the
`RouterModule.forRoot.errorHandler` / `Router.errorHandler`.
It provides a quick, short way for users to define a function to handle
`NavigationError` events.
PR Close#48551
The ESM js files need to be referenced, and the router tests rely
on `async/await` with change detection- so a special rule is required
that downlevels `async/await` to generators (similar to the Angular CLI)
PR Close#48521
Since we generate a `.mjs` file as entry-point for jasmine tests,
a couple of issues prevented the transitive dependencies from
bootstrap targets to be brought in (causing resolution errors):
1. The `_files` (previously `_esm2015`) targets are no longer needed,
and they also miss all the information on runfiles.
2. The aspect for computing linker mappings does not respect the
`bootstrap` attribute from the `spec_entrypoint` so we manually
add the extract ESM output targets (this rule works with the aspect
and forwards linker mappings).
PR Close#48521
For every `ts_library` target we expose a shorthand that grants
access to the JS files because `DefaultInfo` of a ts library
only exposes the `.d.ts` files.
We rename this away from `es2015` since in practice it's a much
higher target these days. Additionally we no longer use the devmode
output but rather use the prodmode output which has the explicit
`.mjs` output- compatible with ESM.
PR Close#48521
The events observable is part of the lifecycle of a navigation. This should
be contained in the NavigationTransitions class rather than the Router.
This Subject is re-exported by the router as an observable to maintain
the public API
PR Close#48202
The events observable is part of the lifecycle of a navigation. This should
be contained in the NavigationTransitions class rather than the Router.
This Subject is re-exported by the router as an observable to maintain
the public API
PR Close#48202
The router providers a configurable `onSameUrlNavigation` value that
allows developers to configure whether navigations to the same URL as
the current one should be processed or ignored. However, this only acts
as a default value and there isn't an API for easily overriding this for
a single navigation. Instead, developers are forced to update the value
of the property on the router instance and remember to reset it.
This feature fills a small gap in the Router APIs that enables
developers to accomplish the task of force reloading a bit easier.
Lengthy discussion about this here: #21115
PR Close#48050
This commit extracts the Router's navigation "transitions" to a separate
file. The goal here is twofold:
- Separate the Router's logic into more manageable chunks. Rather than
having to always edit a 1000+ line file, this separates different
pieces into smaller, more focused files
- More importantly, this sets the groundwork for separating the Router
state from the individual navigation transition. That is, it would be
good for the rxjs pipeline to _not_ modify the Router state but only
keep track of its own intermediate stages and emit outwards during
important events. The Router can subscribe to those events and make
updates to its state. This would theoretically allow us to swap those
implementations independently. That is, the Router's state management
can be changed without changing the transition handling and
vice-versa.
PR Close#48092
The `initNavigated` flag is not necessary. The way `enabledBlocking`
works is by blocking any navigations from finishing until the
application has bootstrapped. The bootstrap is unblocked as soon as we
hit the `afterPreactivation` step. After that point,
`afterPreactivation` is always unblocked because the `bootstrapDone`
Subject is completed/stopped. There is no need for an additional
variable to track this information.
PR Close#48064
The Router currently silently ignores navigations for two reasons:
1. By default, same URL navigations are ignored. When this situation is
encountered, the navigation is ignored without any events
2. A `UrlHandlingStrategy` may ignore some URLs. For situations when the
strategy returns `false` for `shouldProcessUrl`, the Router silently
ignores the URL and updates its internal state without running
matching, guards, or resolver logic.
This commit adds new `NavigationSkipped` events for the above two situations.
PR Close#48024
This commit makes several updates to the bootstrap tests of the Router.
The change that made the real difference was providing
`MockPlatformLocation`. Other changes include:
* using `async/await` instead of `done`
* not providing APP_BASE_HREF (recent router refactors made this unnecessary)
* using some functional guards to simplify some tests
PR Close#48176
If `history.pushState()` or `history.replaceState()` were called manually without including the `navigationId` field the state was being incorrectly discarded - that logic was for maintaining the original behavior of `NavigationStart.restoredState`.
Improves on #28176, fully fixes#28108, see also #28954
PR Close#48033
The public API for enabling this option has already been removed. This change
updates the internal Router code to not include any logic to support it.
PR Close#47933
Due to being only 1 letter away from `provideRouter`, it is quite
possible that developers may accidentally use `provideRoutes` rather
than `provideRouter` in the `boostrapApplication` function. This change
will warn developers when `provideRoutes` is used without the `Router`.
PR Close#47896
This function is too similar in name to the new `provideRouter` and can
lead to misconfiguring the router. The function itself is just a small
wrapper around `{provide: ROUTES, multi: true, useValue: routes}`. It is
rarely necessary to provide routes in this way. The harm `provideRoutes`
will cause due to being only 1 letter away from `provideRouter` vastly
outweighs the benefit of a slightly shorter provider.
PR Close#47896
Matthieu Riegler