Prior to this change, binding to radio value was sensitive to the order in which `value` & `formField` where binding in the template.
The compiler change makes that order non-important.
fixes#66402
(cherry picked from commit 65fa5b5439)
This completes the rename started in #66136. `[field]` is too generic of
a selector for the forms system to own, and likely to cause naming
collisions with existing components. Therefore it is being renamed to
`[formField]`
(cherry picked from commit 5671f2cc07)
This will replace the `[field]` directive, since `[field]` is a very
generic name for signal forms to commandeer
refactor(forms): hook up `formField` directive in compiler
Hooks up the `formField` direcive to get the same treatment as the
`field` directive in the compiler.
apply updated formatting
(cherry picked from commit 2d85ae5811)
The framework will now bind all field state properties to their
corresponding native properties (if any) on interop form controls (those
using `ControlValueAccessor`), excluding those handled explicitly by
`ControlValueAccessor` such as `disabled`.
(cherry picked from commit 82a2de201f)
The framework will now bind the field state properties to all matching
directive inputs on form controls using Reactive Forms'
`ControlValueAccessor`.
(cherry picked from commit 15bddbdcda)
The framework will now bind the field state properties to all matching
directive inputs on custom form controls.
(cherry picked from commit 0c8f15d546)
Since the `Field` directive manages binding `FieldState` properties to
the underlying form control automatically, the type checker prohibits
explicit bindings to the same properties to avoid conflicts. This proved
problematic in cases where developers wanted to bind these properties to
the inputs of other directives on form controls. Now the framework will
bind the field state properties to all matching directive inputs on
native controls.
Fix#65617
(cherry picked from commit c149f47ef6)
* Allow custom controls to make `pending` a required input
* Refactor test for `pending` input to be consistent with other control
properties
* Test that `pending` inputs are reset when the field binding changes
(cherry picked from commit 1a4c3eb1d0)
There's no longer a need to test that inputs are set before
initialization on custom controls now that required inputs are
supported.
(cherry picked from commit 9ad603fa11)
* Refactor test for `disabledReasons` input to be consistent with other control
properties
* Test that `disabledReasons` inputs are reset when the field binding changes
(cherry picked from commit 4f73a350a5)
* Allow custom controls to make `dirty` a required input
* Refactor test for `dirty` input to be consistent with other control
properties
* Test that `dirty` inputs are reset when the field binding changes
(cherry picked from commit 89c37f1f7f)
* Refactor test for `invalid` input to be consistent with other control
properties
* Test that `invalid` inputs are reset when the field binding changes
(cherry picked from commit b563b5cfc2)
* Allow custom controls to make `hidden` a required input
* Refactor test for `hidden` input to be consistent with other control
properties
* Test that `hidden` inputs are reset when the field binding changes
(cherry picked from commit 82edf18427)
* Recognize directives with non signal-based models as valid custom controls
* Relax type checker to allow non signal-based models
The `FormValueControl` and `FormCheckboxControl` interfaces still
require a `model()`-input, however, a custom control need not implement
either interface to be bound by the `Field` directive.
All of the following examples can be used to define a custom control:
```ts
// Preferred: model()
class MyFormControl implements FormValueControl<string> {
readonly value: model.required<string>();
}
// Supported: input() + output()
class MyFormControl {
readonly value: input.required<string>();
readonly valueChange: output<string>();
}
// Supported: @Input() + @Output()
class MyFormControl {
@Input({required: true}) value!: string;
@Output() valueChange: new EventEmitter<string>();
}
```
The latter two may still choose to implement `FormUiControl` for other
properties, but again it is not required.
Fix#65478
(cherry picked from commit cb09fb8308)
Updates signal forms to pass the full `Field` directive to the class
configuration functions, rather than just the state. This allows
developers to take the element as well as the state into consideration
when deciding classes to apply.
Closes#65762
BREAKING CHANGE: The shape of `SignalFormsConfig.classes` has changed
Previously each function in the `classes` map took a `FieldState`. Now
it takes a `Field` directive.
For example if you previously had:
```
provideSignalFormsConfig({
classes: {
'my-valid': (state) => state.valid()
}
})
```
You would need to update to:
```
provideSignalFormsConfig({
classes: {
'my-valid': ({state}) => state().valid()
}
})
```
(cherry picked from commit 348f149e8b)
FormUiControl states that hidden, pending and dirty will be bind in custom controls, but this is currently not the case.
Fixes#65575
(cherry picked from commit 9fe9566581)
Extends the `FormUiControl` interface to allow `InputSignalWithTransform` in addition to `InputSignal` for its properties.
Fixes#65756
(cherry picked from commit 7d1e502345)
This is necessary to exclude a race condition where the MutationObserver initialized by the instruction fired before the inputs are binded.
fixes#65678
(cherry picked from commit f35b2ef47c)
Adds a DI configuration option for signal forms that allows the
developer to specify CSS classes that should be automatically added
by the `Field` directive based on the field's status.
(cherry picked from commit c70e246c23)
The type checker will no longer prohibit binding the Signal Forms `[field]`
directive to an input with a dynamic `[attr.type]` or `[type]` binding.
(cherry picked from commit 3a1eb07c46)
Support binding `[field]` to directives that implement
`FormValueControl` or `FormCheckboxControl`.
The `[field]` binds to whichever directive (or component) matches first in the
event there are multiple implementations. We are considering whether to make
this an error state, which could be reported during type checking.
Closes#63910, Closes#64992
(cherry picked from commit f97a1d4856)
An early piece of feedback received regarding custom controls hosted on
native inputs was that they required a lot of boilerplate to bind
`FieldState` properties. Each property required an input to accept the
property, and a host binding to forward it to the native control.
(cherry picked from commit c727df5d38)
* Apply any debounce rules to updates from interop controls (if configured).
* Add tests to ensure debouncing works for all control types (native, custom,
and interop).
(cherry picked from commit b1037ec2f0)
Test that a component with a bound `[field]` input is not treated as a
control, and that `fieldBinding` does not include the corresponding
`Field` instance.
(cherry picked from commit acb78eeb7a)
Fixes some type checking errors in the signal forms tests that accumulated while there wasn't any type checking.
(cherry picked from commit 10915f2f5f)
When we set the `value` on a `<select>` element we're really just
setting the selected `<option>`. It treats the selected option as the
source of truth, rather than the actual value. This means that if
options are added or removed or their value changes, the `<select>` may
wind up with a different `value` than what's in our model.
This PR resolves this issue by adding a `MutationObserver` to the select
that is used to resync its value to the model whenever the options may
have changed.
(cherry picked from commit 194b41199b)
For each field state property, check if it has changed since the last
time it was checked before writing it the corresponding form control
property.
The `pattern` and `required` properties of the field state now return a
default value rather than `undefined` if not defined by metadata.
(cherry picked from commit 41be02da2f)
The directive implemnetation might set CVA values during the template evaluation. Since the template is a reactive context we need to untrack when setting the CVA values to prevent writing to signals in a reactive context.
fixes#64614
PR Close#64618
Prior to this change, `FieldState` defined a signal for each built-in
property. This unfortunately meant that the `Field` directive had no way
of knowing which property had actually been defined in the schema, and
would thus attempt to propagate them all to the bound form control. This
meant that the default values of these signals would override the
default or template defined values of these control properties.
Now these properties are `undefined` by default, and only initialized if
defined in the schema. Thus the `Field` directive will not attempt to
bind any properties that aren't explicitly managed by the schema.
PR Close#64446
Note that unlike the other built-in properties, `pattern` is not
propagated to native controls so the lack of symmetry with other
property tests is intentional.
PR Close#64446
Add support for interoperability between signal forms and reactive forms that
commit effccffde0 had removed.
A signal forms field can once again be bound to any element or component with a
`ControlValueAccessor`.
PR Close#64471
When a directive injects a `ViewContainerRef`, the runtime inserts a container that was throwing off the logic that recognizes native controls.
These changes switch to check if the node is a native control through the `TNode`. This also makes it a bit less prone to breaking during SSR.
Fixes#64362.
PR Close#64368
Caches information about the kind of form control that a `TNode`
represents in `TNodeFlags`. This avoids redundant computations on
subsequent template create and update passes.
Renames the `INVALID_CONTROL_HOST` error code to
`INVALID_FIELD_DIRECTIVE_HOST` for clarity and adds a test for it.
PR Close#64351
Renames the control directive and the input that users set to bind a
field to a UI control.
Previously users would do:
```
<input [control]="someField">
```
Now users will do:
```
<input [filed]="someField">
```
PR Close#64300
Matthieu Riegler